Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Processor N95

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

Der Intel Processor N200 ist eine Notebook-CPU der Einstiegsklasse der Alder Lake-N Serie. Er wurde im Januar 2023 vorgestellt und bietet 4 der 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur) mit 1 GHz bis zu 3,7 GHz (3,2 GHz Multi-Core-Turbo). Die E-Kerne unterstützen kein HyperThreading und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6300HQ). Der i3 bietet keinerlei vPro Management Features.

Performance

Die Performance des N200 ist durch die Halbierung der Kerne deutlich schwächer als beim i3-N305. Die Einzelkernperformance ist aber aufgrund der fehlenden P-Kerne in Alder Lake-N eingeschränkt. Theoretisch sollte sich die Performance etwas unterhalb eines alten Core i5-8250U befinden (4 Kerne mit Hyperthreading, max 3,4 GHz, 15W).

Grafikeinheit

Alder Lake-N integriert eine Xe basierende Grafikeinheit mit bis zu 32 EUs (Execution Units). Diese sind alle im N200 aktiviert und takten von 450 - 750 MHz relativ gering. Durch die geringe Kernanzahl, Taktung und die Einschränkung auf Single-Channel-RAM, ist die Spieleleistung aber deutlich eingeschränkt.

Features

Der kleine Alder-Lake-N-Chip integriert teilweise Wi-Fi 6E und Bluetooth 5.2 (im PCH). Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt Single-Channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 und LPDDR5-4800. Die Media Engine Quick Sync kann nun auch AV1 dekodieren (wie bei Alder Lake). Für die externe Anbindung von Peripherie unterstützt der PCH PCIe Gen3 x9.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der N200 ist nur mit 6 Watt (PL1) TDP spezifiziert und eignet sich daher auch für lüfterlose Systeme. Gefertigt wird der Prozessor im verbesserten Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Processor N95

► remove from comparison Intel N95

Der Intel Processor N95 (fälschlich auch Celeron N95) ist eine Notebook-CPU der Einstiegsklasse der Alder Lake-N Serie. Er wurde im Januar 2023 vorgestellt und bietet 4 der 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur) mit bis zu 3,4 GHz. Die E-Kerne unterstützen kein HyperThreading und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6300HQ). Ähnlich zum Processor N100, jedoch mit höherem TDP und dadurch bei längerer Last wahrscheinlich leicht schneller.

Performance

Die Performance des N95 ist durch die Halbierung der Kerne deutlich schwächer als beim i3-N305 und etwas unterhalb des N200 (durch die geringere Taktraten). Die Einzelkernperformance ist aber aufgrund der fehlenden P-Kerne in Alder Lake-N eingeschränkt.

Grafikeinheit

Alder Lake-N integriert eine Xe basierende Grafikeinheit mit bis zu 32 EUs (Execution Units). Davon sind im N95 nur 16 aktiviert und takten mit 1200 MHz relativ gering. Durch die geringe Kernanzahl, Taktung und die Einschränkung auf Single-Channel-RAM, ist die Spieleleistung aber deutlich eingeschränkt.

Features

Der kleine Alder-Lake-N-Chip integriert teilweise Wi-Fi 6E und Bluetooth 5.2 (im PCH). Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt Single-Channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 und LPDDR5-4800. Die Media Engine Quick Sync kann nun auch AV1 dekodieren (wie bei Alder Lake). Für die externe Anbindung von Peripherie unterstützt der PCH PCIe Gen3 x9.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der N95 ist mit 12Watt (PL1) TDP spezifiziert und eignet sich daher für dünne und leichte Systeme. Gefertigt wird der Prozessor im verbesserten Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).

ModelIntel Processor N200Intel Celeron N5095AIntel Processor N95
CodenameAlder Lake-NJasper LakeAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Jasper LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Serie: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 « - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3700 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz <=3400 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP6 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache1.5 MB
SocketBGA1338BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.7 pt (34%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N95
24.8 pt (41%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (25%)
133%
1 N95 +
60 Points (34%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
200%
1 N95 +
min: 181     avg: 182.3     median: 182 (3%)     max: 184 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
197%
1 N95 +
min: 2528     avg: 2711     median: 2769 (3%)     max: 2786 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
132%
1 N95 +
min: 618     avg: 820     median: 914 (39%)     max: 935 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N200 +
265 Points (29%)
132%
1 N95 +
min: 229     avg: 306.8     median: 350 (39%)     max: 357 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N200 +
542 Points (1%)
190%
1 N95 +
min: 976     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (3%)     max: 1067 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
219 Points (1%)
203%
1 N95 +
min: 408     avg: 437     median: 445 (3%)     max: 452 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
113 Points (32%)
134%
1 N95 +
min: 98     avg: 136.2     median: 151 (42%)     max: 155 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
203%
1 N95 +
min: 5.18     avg: 5.5     median: 5.6 (7%)     max: 5.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
1.4 Points (32%)
135%
1 N95 +
min: 1.3     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (43%)     max: 1.86 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
121%
1 N95 +
min: 3562     avg: 4529     median: 4783 (29%)     max: 5141 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
184%
1 N95 +
min: 12582     avg: 13741     median: 13854 (10%)     max: 14545 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (7%)
200%
1 N95 +
min: 20429     avg: 21521     median: 22075 (14%)     max: 22275 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
127%
1 N95 +
min: 5904     avg: 7259     median: 7574 (9%)     max: 8177 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N200 +
875 s (10%)
163%
1 N95 +
min: 519.662     avg: 541     median: 537.3 (6%)     max: 568.939 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N200 +
26 s (5%)
152%
1 N95 +
min: 16.449     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18.213 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
110%
1 N95 +
min: 2181     avg: 2303     median: 2319.5 (4%)     max: 2391 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
170%
1 N95 +
min: 11654     avg: 12003     median: 12177 (7%)     max: 12224 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
3230 MIPS (38%)
118%
1 N95 +
min: 2972     avg: 3521     median: 3803 (45%)     max: 3866 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N200 +
16.3 fps (5%)
199%
1 N95 +
min: 29.65     avg: 31.7     median: 32.4 (11%)     max: 32.45 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N200 +
80 fps (18%)
203%
1 N95 +
min: 145.25     avg: 158.2     median: 162.2 (37%)     max: 163.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
209%
1 N95 +
min: 3.03     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (6%)     max: 3.29 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
84%
1 N95 +
min: 0.236     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.244 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
85%
1 N95 +
min: 0.492     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.501 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
84%
1 N95 +
min: 2.4     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (7%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
197%
1 N95 +
min: 2161     avg: 2202     median: 2186.5 (28%)     max: 2275 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
193%
1 N95 +
min: 1103     avg: 1120     median: 1113 (8%)     max: 1152 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
137%
1 N95 +
min: 0.83     avg: 0.9     median: 0.8 (18%)     max: 1.135 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
153%
1 N95 +
min: 5612     avg: 5863     median: 5952 (13%)     max: 6017 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
97%
1 N95 +
min: 7.058     avg: 18.8     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 24.428 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
106%
1 N95 +
min: 17.513     avg: 39.7     median: 40.5 (2%)     max: 50.772 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N200 +
1011 s (4%)
123%
1 N95 +
min: 532.8     avg: 845     median: 824.7 (4%)     max: 1025.92 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (7%)
154%
1 N95 +
min: 13896     avg: 14556     median: 14595 (11%)     max: 14929 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
205%
1 N95 +
min: 5084     avg: 5571     median: 5661 (14%)     max: 5806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
168%
1 N95 +
min: 36089     avg: 44673     median: 46477 (38%)     max: 47272 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
162%
1 N95 +
min: 36329     avg: 44756     median: 46489 (38%)     max: 47322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
141%
1 N95 +
min: 47145     avg: 48606     median: 49062 (41%)     max: 49955 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
148%
1 N95 +
min: 4105     avg: 4214     median: 4217 (11%)     max: 4345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
144%
1 N95 +
min: 5701     avg: 5923     median: 5952 (11%)     max: 6062 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
188%
1 N95 +
min: 2081     avg: 2301     median: 2346 (10%)     max: 2386 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (24%)
128%
1 N95 +
min: 934     avg: 1132     median: 1227 (31%)     max: 1234 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (6%)
178%
1 N95 +
min: 2800     avg: 2958     median: 2961 (11%)     max: 3114 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
928 Points (36%)
108%
1 N95 +
min: 761     avg: 917     median: 999 (39%)     max: 1013 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
167%
1 N95 +
min: 2391     avg: 2577     median: 2566 (5%)     max: 2793 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
891 Points (4%)
111%
1 N95 +
min: 749     avg: 910     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1005 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
167%
1 N95 +
min: 2382     avg: 2537     median: 2531 (8%)     max: 2737 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
98%
1 N95 +
min: 3411     avg: 4100     median: 4450 (44%)     max: 4553 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
9989 Points (10%)
102%
1 N95 +
min: 9662     avg: 10169     median: 10228 (10%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
138%
1 N95 +
min: 1026     avg: 1186     median: 1056 (1%)     max: 1577 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N95 +
min: 93.2     avg: 121.3     median: 126.8 (36%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
104%
1 N95 +
min: 121.3     avg: 163.5     median: 178.3 (33%)     max: 183.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (24%)
124%
1 N95 +
min: 555     avg: 716     median: 764 (29%)     max: 820 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
58%
1 N95 +
min: 20.3     avg: 25.3     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 31.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
65%
1 N95 +
min: 18.9     avg: 21.4     median: 20.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
83%
1 N95 +
min: 6.24     avg: 8.4     median: 7.3 (5%)     max: 12.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)
131%
1 N95 +
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N95 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 22. 21:33:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14981 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734899619s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0s ... 0.016s

#11 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.016s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14981 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#13 got single benchmarks 14981 +0.008s ... 0.028s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.078s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.078s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)