Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Celeron N5095A vs Intel Core i3-N300

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

Der Intel Processor N100 ist eine Notebook-CPU der Einstiegsklasse der Alder Lake-N Serie. Er wurde im Januar 2023 vorgestellt und bietet 4 der 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur) mit 1 GHz bis zu 3,4 GHz. Die E-Kerne unterstützen kein HyperThreading und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6300HQ).

Performance

Die Performance des N100 ist durch die Halbierung der Kerne deutlich schwächer als beim i3-N305 und etewas unterhalb des N200 (durch die geringere Taktraten). Die Einzelkernperformance ist aber aufgrund der fehlenden P-Kerne in Alder Lake-N eingeschränkt.

Grafikeinheit

Alder Lake-N integriert eine Xe basierende Grafikeinheit mit bis zu 32 EUs (Execution Units). Davon sind im N100 nur 24 aktiviert und takten von 450 - 750 MHz relativ gering. Durch die geringe Kernanzahl, Taktung und die Einschränkung auf Single-Channel-RAM, ist die Spieleleistung aber deutlich eingeschränkt.

Features

Der kleine Alder-Lake-N-Chip integriert teilweise Wi-Fi 6E und Bluetooth 5.2 (im PCH). Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt Single-Channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 und LPDDR5-4800. Die Media Engine Quick Sync kann nun auch AV1 dekodieren (wie bei Alder Lake). Für die externe Anbindung von Peripherie unterstützt der PCH PCIe Gen3 x9.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der N100 ist nur mit 6 Watt (PL1) TDP spezifiziert und eignet sich daher auch für lüfterlose Systeme. Gefertigt wird der Prozessor im verbesserten Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

Intel Core i3-N300

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N300

Der Intel Core i3-N300 ist eine Notebook-CPU der Einstiegsklasse der Alder Lake-N Serie. Er wurde im Januar 2023 vorgestellt und bietet 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur) mit bis zu 3,8 GHz (3 GHz Multi-Core-Turbo). Die E-Kerne unterstützen kein HyperThreading und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6300HQ). Der i3 bietet keinerlei vPro Management Features.

Performance

Die Performance des i3 ist stark abhängig von der Kühlung und den TDP Settings. Wenn alle 8 Kerne ausgelastet werden, sollte er eine gute Multi-Thread-Performance bieten, jedoch wird der TDP von 7 Watt, bei längerer Last die Leistung deutlich einschränken. Die Einzelkernperformance ist aber aufgrund der fehlenden P-Kerne in Alder Lake-N nicht sehr hoch.

Grafikeinheit

Alder Lake-N integriert eine Xe basierende Grafikeinheit mit bis zu 32 EUs (Execution Units). Diese sind alle im i3-N305 aktiviert und takten bis 1,25 GHz. Durch die geringe Kernanzahl und die Einschränkung auf Single-Channel-RAM, ist die Spieleleistung aber deutlich eingeschränkt.

Features

Der kleine Alder-Lake-N-Chip integriert teilweise Wi-Fi 6E und Bluetooth 5.2 (im PCH). Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt Single-Channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 und LPDDR5-4800. Die Media Engine Quick Sync kann nun auch AV1 dekodieren (wie bei Alder Lake). Für die externe Anbindung von Peripherie unterstützt der PCH PCIe Gen3 x9.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der i3-N300 ist mit 7 Watt (PL1) TDP spezifiziert. Gefertigt wird der Prozessor im verbesserten Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).

ModelIntel Processor N100Intel Celeron N5095AIntel Core i3-N300
CodenameAlder Lake-NJasper LakeAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Jasper LakeIntel Alder Lake-N
Serie: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 « - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3400 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz <=3800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB4 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP6 Watt15 Watt7 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1264BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$128 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L2 Cache1.5 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
24.4 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N300
19 pt (32%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (34%)     max: 61 Points
34 Points (19%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
165 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1577     avg: 2449     median: 2559.5 (2%)     max: 2983 Points
2546 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 747     avg: 885     median: 910.5 (39%)     max: 942 Points
513 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 285     avg: 338     median: 347 (38%)     max: 358 Points
195 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 590     avg: 934     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1139 Points
968 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N100 +
min: 246     avg: 384.6     median: 401.5 (3%)     max: 479 Points
104%
1 i3-N300 +
416 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N100 +
min: 118.8     avg: 143.8     median: 147.9 (42%)     max: 155 Points
85 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3.84     avg: 4.6     median: 4.2 (5%)     max: 5.99 Points
126%
1 i3-N300 +
5.3 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4604     avg: 4896     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
2884 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9608     avg: 12281     median: 11207 (8%)     max: 15336 Points
107%
1 i3-N300 +
12014 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 14514     avg: 18829     median: 16948 (11%)     max: 24225 Points
109%
1 i3-N300 +
18450 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N100 +
min: 7171     avg: 7699     median: 7750 (9%)     max: 8227 Points
4497 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 569     median: 588.3 (7%)     max: 645.884 s
111%
1 i3-N300 +
531 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 16.2 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
17.5 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2187     avg: 2343     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2501 Points
1915 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N100 +
min: 7532     avg: 11072     median: 11663.5 (7%)     max: 13291 MIPS
103%
1 i3-N300 +
11976 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3046     avg: 3629     median: 3653.5 (43%)     max: 3958 MIPS
2403 MIPS (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N100 +
min: 20.85     avg: 27.1     median: 24.1 (8%)     max: 34.7 fps
120%
1 i3-N300 +
28.9 fps (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N100 +
min: 101.8     avg: 134.8     median: 121.2 (28%)     max: 173 fps
106.6 fps (25%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1.72     avg: 2.8     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.49 fps
109%
1 i3-N300 +
3.2 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N100 +
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.263 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N100 +
min: 0.529     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
2.6 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2545     median: 2067 (26%)     max: 3964 Seconds
2147 Seconds (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1017     avg: 1322     median: 1198.5 (8%)     max: 1956 Seconds
109%
1 i3-N300 +
1095 Seconds (8%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 1.06 sec
1.3 sec (29%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5232     median: 4838 (10%)     max: 6441 Points
4261 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
33.2 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 40.302     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.679 s
69.1 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 816.966     avg: 836     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 863.891 s
1381 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 12661     median: 11998 (9%)     max: 15625 Points
127%
1 i3-N300 +
15263 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3723     avg: 5317     median: 5940 (15%)     max: 6486 Points
4983 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34828     avg: 42619     median: 41217 (33%)     max: 51063 Points
28114 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 34083     avg: 42751     median: 41809 (34%)     max: 51420 Points
28073 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 50867     avg: 52331     median: 52418.5 (43%)     max: 53373 Points
28903 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3133     avg: 3959     median: 4061.5 (10%)     max: 4693 Points
100%
1 i3-N300 +
4049 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4589     avg: 5806     median: 6371 (11%)     max: 6602 Points
5528 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1407     avg: 1999     median: 2054 (9%)     max: 2519 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1195     median: 1221.5 (31%)     max: 1245 Points
762 Points (19%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2283     avg: 2937     median: 3157 (12%)     max: 3282 Points
2803 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 915     avg: 981     median: 986 (39%)     max: 1018 Points
626 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1911     avg: 2598     median: 2829 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
2674 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 968     avg: 990     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
616 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2278     avg: 2624     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
2642 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 4278     avg: 4440     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4549 Points
2913 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N100 +
min: 10361     avg: 11002     median: 11197 (11%)     max: 11264 Points
9894 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1049     median: 1024.5 (1%)     max: 1122 ms
1638 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N100 +
50984 Points (43%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N100 +
min: 128.3     avg: 133.5     median: 134.3 (38%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 N100 +
min: 156.3     avg: 170.5     median: 170.9 (31%)     max: 187.4 Points
104.3 Points (19%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N100 +
min: 706     avg: 779     median: 786 (30%)     max: 839 Points
529 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 21.2     median: 21.7 (4%)     max: 29.1 Watt
24.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 20.9     median: 24 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
108%
1 i3-N300 +
22.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.84     avg: 7.3     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 10.3 Watt
14.7 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3.92     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 6.77 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N100 +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N300 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 22. 11:27:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14928 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734863222s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.012s ... 0.024s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0s ... 0.024s

#11 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.024s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14928 +0.003s ... 0.027s

#13 got single benchmarks 14928 +0.004s ... 0.032s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.05s ... 0.082s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.082s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)