Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

Die ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 ist die schwächste dezidierte Grafikkarte von ATI der X1000 Serie. Für aktuelle Spiele nur sehr eingeschränkt zu empfehlen.

Windows Vista Aero Glass läuft auf dem Grafikchip.

ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

Die ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 ist eine höhergetaktete (bei gleichem Verbrauch dank strained silicon Produktionsverfahren) Version die X1300 Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Durch den höheren Takt, hat die X1350 sogar die ältere X1400 überholt (470 versus 445 MHz). Für DirectX 9 Spiele ist sie nur sehr eingeschränkt zu benutzen (geringe Auflösung, wenig Details, ruckeln).

Wie auch alle anderen Karten der X1000 Serie unterstützt die X1350 die AVIVO Video Technologie zur Hardware-unterstützten Dekodierung von MPEG-2, MPEG-4, DivX, WMV9 und VC-1 Video Formaten.

Windows Vista Aero Glass sollte auf diesem Grafikchip flüssig laufen.

show full text
ATI Mobility Radeon X1300ATI Mobility Radeon X1350
Mobility Radeon X1000 Serie
Mobility Radeon X1900 compare 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT compare 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 compare 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1900 compare 36/8 cores @ 0.4 GHz256 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800XT compare 16/8 cores @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 650 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1800 compare 12/6 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1700 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1600 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 470 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1450 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 450 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1350 4/2 cores @ 0.47 GHz128 Bit @ 350 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1400 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
Mobility Radeon X1300 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 250 MHz
CodenameM52M52
Pipelines4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Kerntakt350 MHz470 MHz
Speichertakt250 MHz350 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypDDR1/DDR2/GDDR3DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3
Max. Speichergröße256 MB256 MB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Herstellungsprozess90 nm90 nm
FeaturesAvivo Video und Display Engine. PCI Express x16-Bus; 90-nmAvivo Video und Display Engine. PCI Express x16-Bus; 90-nm
Erscheinungsdatum19.01.2006 18.09.2006
Herstellerseitewww.ati.comati.amd.com
Transistors105 Million

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
9000 Points (9%)
12234 Points (13%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3200     avg: 3288     median: 3287.5 (2%)     max: 3375 Points
4271 Points (2%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 1000     avg: 1333     median: 1332.5 (1%)     max: 1665 Points
2132 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
3DMark 06
560 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Mobility Radeon X1350
1088 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
3DMark 06
725 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon X1350 → 155% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 15. 03:16:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 40 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 43 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731636996s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.026s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.026s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 40 +0.019s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 40 +0.003s ... 0.048s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 43 +0s ... 0.048s

#11 got single benchmarks 43 +0.003s ... 0.051s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.055s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.055s

#15 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.055s

#16 return log +0.002s ... 0.057s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)