Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G78 MP22 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP2

ARM Mali-G78 MP22

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP22

Die ARM Mali-G78MP22 ist eine integrierte High-End-Grafikeinheit für ARM-SoCs, die erstmals Mitte 2021 im Smartphone- und Tablet-Chip HiSilicon Kirin 9000E verbaut wurde (z.B. MatePad Pro 12.6). Die G78MP22 integriert 22 der 24 Kerne/Cluster und nutzt die 2. Generation der Valhall-Architektur. Im Vergleich zur G77 bietet die G78 zwei neue Features: Asynchronous Top Level und Fragment Dependency Tracking.

Die GPU zählt damit zu den schnellsten Grafikkarten für Android-Smartphones und Tablets in 2020 und daher sollten alle aktuellen Spiele flüssig dargestellt werden.

An Grafik-APIs unterstützt die G78 OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 und OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G71 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP2

Die ARM Mali-G71 MP2 ist eine integrierte Einstiegsgrafikkarte in ARM-SoCs. Sie wird z.B. in den Mediatek Helio P23 SoCs verbaut mit 700 bzw 770 MHz taktfrequenz. Die MP2 Variante der G71 verbaut 2 der 32 möglichen Grafikkerne und unterstützt OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 11 FL11_1, RenderScript.

ARM Mali-G78 MP22ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Mali-G Serie
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhallMimir
ArchitekturValhallBifrost
Pipelines24 - unified2 - unified
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
Herstellungsprozess5 nm16 nm
Erscheinungsdatum26.05.2020 03.06.2016
Herstellerseitewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
Kerntakt770 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Mali-G71 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 78858 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 79048 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T8 x 2300 MHz770 MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 770 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
13392 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
11598 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
16653 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
9630 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
12079 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
6399 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
1805 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
31 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
76 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
64 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
112 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
154 fps (9%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP22
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
232 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
74.4 fps (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2471     avg: 4582     median: 4550 (2%)     max: 6755 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1205     avg: 1444     median: 1451.5 (2%)     max: 1668 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
11.8 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 6% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP2:
30  fps
med.
Mali-G71 MP2:
26 29 30 ~ 28 fps
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
30  fps
90%
Mali-G71 MP2:
21 29 29 30 ~ 27 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP2:
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Mali-G71 MP2:
30 58 60 60 ~ 52 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP2:
60  fps
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
60  fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
47  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
46 48 54 60 ~ 52 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G71 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
23 30 ~ 27 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G71 MP2:
28 29 29 30 ~ 29 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
23 24 25 28 29 29 ~ 26 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Mali-G71 MP2:
59  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP22:
61  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP22 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 90%

ARM Mali-G78 MP22lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet61
PUBG Mobile30
Subway Surfers61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1
2









ARM Mali-G71 MP2lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile302827
Arena of Valor6052
Shadow Fight 36060
Battle Bay47
Dead Trigger 252
Asphalt 8: Airborne3027
Asphalt 9: Legends2926
Temple Run 259
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2
2
1


3
3
1

1







Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 23. 10:53:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10957 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8348 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732355617s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:17:45 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10957 +0.014s ... 0.033s

#9 got single benchmarks 10957 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8348 +0s ... 0.037s

#11 got single benchmarks 8348 +0.021s ... 0.058s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.063s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.064s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.065s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.065s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.073s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.073s

#19 Got 40 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.078s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.078s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.079s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.082s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.082s

#24 return log +0.002s ... 0.084s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)