Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G78 MP20 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP8

ARM Mali-G78 MP20

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP20

Die ARM Mali-G78MP20 ist eine integrierte High-End-Grafikeinheit für ARM-SoCs, die erstmals Ende 2021 im Smartphone-Chip Google Tensor verbaut wurde (z.B. MatePad Pro 12.6). Die G78MP20 integriert 20 der 24 Kerne/Cluster und nutzt die 2. Generation der Valhall-Architektur. Im Vergleich zur G77 bietet die G78 zwei neue Features: Asynchronous Top Level und Fragment Dependency Tracking.

Die GPU zählt damit zu den schnellsten Grafikkarten für Android-Smartphones und Tablets in 2021 und daher sollten alle aktuellen Spiele flüssig dargestellt werden.

An Grafik-APIs unterstützt die G78 OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 und OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G71 MP8

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP8

Die ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ist eine integrierte High-End-Grafikeinheit für ARM-SoCs, die erstmals im November 2016 im Smartphone- und Tablet-Chip HiSilicon Kirin 960 verbaut wurde. Nach ersten Benchmarks übertrifft die GPU knapp die Adreno 530 im Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 und zählt damit Ende 2016 zu den schnellsten Grafikeinheiten für (Android-)Geräte.

ARM Mali-G78 MP20ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Mali-G Serie
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhallMimir
ArchitekturValhallBifrost
Pipelines24 - unified8 - unified
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
Herstellungsprozess5 nm16 nm
Erscheinungsdatum26.05.2020 03.06.2016
Herstellerseitewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
Kerntakt900 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Mali-G78 MP20GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Google Tensor8 x 1800 MHz? MHz848 MHz
CPU in Mali-G71 MP8GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9608 x 2400 MHz? MHz900 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 960s8 x 2100 MHz? MHz900 MHz
min. - max.? MHz848 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 32243     avg: 35201     median: 35210 (4%)     max: 38979 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7344     avg: 8841     median: 9526 (41%)     max: 9654 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11005     avg: 13516     median: 13988 (31%)     max: 15556 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6606     avg: 7184     median: 7205 (36%)     max: 7742 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8605     avg: 9432     median: 8957 (27%)     max: 10733 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 7057     avg: 7127     median: 7064 (4%)     max: 7261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1626     avg: 1816     median: 1823 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
14 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 23     avg: 27     median: 28 (5%)     max: 30 fps
min: 4.7     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 49     avg: 58.7     median: 58 (4%)     max: 69 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 40     avg: 46.7     median: 48 (5%)     max: 52 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 75     median: 65 (1%)     max: 100 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 89     avg: 110     median: 90 (5%)     max: 151 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G78 MP20
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 125     avg: 173.7     median: 144 (1%)     max: 252 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 270503     avg: 282634     median: 282630 (35%)     max: 294770 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 31104     avg: 34536     median: 34536 (78%)     max: 37968 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 42176     avg: 42979     median: 42979 (96%)     max: 43782 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
88.8 fps (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10073     avg: 10164     median: 10164 (3%)     max: 10255 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1909     avg: 1915     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 1921 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.65     avg: 9.8     median: 10.3 (4%)     max: 10.4 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G78 MP20 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 29% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP20:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP20:
30 40 ~ 35 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 ~ 44 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 60 ~ 49 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 60 ~ 59 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP20:
85  fps
56%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 45 56 60 ~ 48 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G78 MP20:
90  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP20 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 56%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 56%

ARM Mali-G78 MP20lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile35
Dead Trigger 285
Temple Run 290
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1
3









ARM Mali-G71 MP8lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Arena of Valor5959
Shadow Fight 34449
Battle Bay5959
Dead Trigger 248
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4





4


1







Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 15:40:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11098 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7648 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732200053s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11098 +0.015s ... 0.033s

#9 got single benchmarks 11098 +0.005s ... 0.038s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7648 +0s ... 0.038s

#11 got single benchmarks 7648 +0.007s ... 0.045s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.055s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.058s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.061s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.063s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.073s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.073s

#19 Got 31 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.076s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.076s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.077s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.08s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.08s

#24 return log +0.002s ... 0.082s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)