Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G72 MP3 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP8

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Die ARM Mali-G72 MP3 ist eine integrierte Mittelklasse-Grafikeinheit für ARM-SoCs, die erstmals Anfangs 2018 im Smartphone- und Tablet-Chip Mediatek Helio P60 verbaut wurde.

Die Mali-G72 basiert auf die 2. Generation der Bifrost Architektur welche Verbesserung bei der Machine Learning Effizienz und einen größeren Tile Buffer für 16x Anti-Aliasing mitbringt.

An Grafik-APIs unterstützt die G72 OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 und Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G71 MP8

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP8

Die ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ist eine integrierte High-End-Grafikeinheit für ARM-SoCs, die erstmals im November 2016 im Smartphone- und Tablet-Chip HiSilicon Kirin 960 verbaut wurde. Nach ersten Benchmarks übertrifft die GPU knapp die Adreno 530 im Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 und zählt damit Ende 2016 zu den schnellsten Grafikeinheiten für (Android-)Geräte.

show full text
ARM Mali-G72 MP3ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Mali-G Serie
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitekturBifrostBifrost
Pipelines3 - unified8 - unified
Kerntakt850 MHz900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
Herstellungsprozess16 nm16 nm
Erscheinungsdatum18.10.2017 03.06.2016
Herstellerseitedeveloper.arm.comwww.arm.com
CodenameMimir
CPU in Mali-G72 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 96118 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 96108 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 96098 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 5 more
min. - max.? - 900 MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G71 MP8GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9608 x 2400 MHz? MHz900 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 960s8 x 2100 MHz? MHz900 MHz
min. - max.? - 900 MHz900 - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 15971     avg: 21202     median: 20999.5 (2%)     max: 25625 Points
min: 32243     avg: 35201     median: 35210 (4%)     max: 38979 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1309     avg: 1756     median: 1761.5 (8%)     max: 2074 Points
min: 1900     avg: 2396     median: 2399 (10%)     max: 2894 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1159     avg: 1635     median: 1605.5 (4%)     max: 2021 Points
min: 1848     avg: 2494     median: 2463.5 (5%)     max: 3241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 853     avg: 1293     median: 1272 (6%)     max: 1659 Points
min: 1600     avg: 1994     median: 2011 (10%)     max: 2368 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 721     avg: 1146     median: 1104 (3%)     max: 1533 Points
min: 1511     avg: 1957     median: 1967.5 (6%)     max: 2380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1008     avg: 1646     median: 1641 (15%)     max: 2110 Points
min: 1840     avg: 2308     median: 2376.5 (21%)     max: 2649 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 861     avg: 1526     median: 1503 (9%)     max: 2092 Points
min: 1719     avg: 2399     median: 2458.5 (15%)     max: 2990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 733     avg: 1255     median: 1264 (6%)     max: 1601 Points
min: 1642     avg: 2011     median: 1875.5 (9%)     max: 2666 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 628     avg: 1112     median: 1104 (4%)     max: 1478 Points
min: 1504     avg: 1993     median: 1772.5 (6%)     max: 2798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 635     avg: 668     median: 652.5 (0%)     max: 713 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 183     avg: 186.4     median: 185 (0%)     max: 192 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.1     avg: 3.1     median: 2.9 (1%)     max: 4.9 fps
min: 4.7     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 6.1     avg: 8.4     median: 8.3 (1%)     max: 10 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 5.8     avg: 8.2     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 11 fps
min: 15     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (2%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.9     avg: 13.1     median: 13 (0%)     max: 18 fps
min: 18     avg: 23.3     median: 23 (0%)     max: 28 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 21     median: 20 (1%)     max: 31 fps
min: 19     avg: 33.3     median: 32 (2%)     max: 44 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP3
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 28     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (0%)     max: 48 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP8
min: 43     avg: 71.9     median: 73.5 (1%)     max: 96 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 25971     avg: 36762     median: 36761.5 (5%)     max: 47552 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 31104     avg: 34536     median: 34536 (78%)     max: 37968 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 42176     avg: 42979     median: 42979 (96%)     max: 43782 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.9 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 5364     avg: 8946     median: 7445.5 (3%)     max: 22800 Points
min: 10073     avg: 10164     median: 10164 (3%)     max: 10255 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1538     avg: 4645     median: 2242.5 (4%)     max: 21615 Points
min: 1909     avg: 1915     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 1921 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.48     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP3 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 159% n=17

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
43 53 57 ~ 51 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
25 30 30 37 48 56.5 ~ 38 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
25 26 30 30 ~ 28 fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
24 25 28 29 30 30 30 30 32 33 ~ 29 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
60  fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
41  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
30.5 56 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
109%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
49 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
102%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
50 56 56 60 60 ~ 56 fps
79%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 ~ 44 fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
51 56 56 59 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
84%
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 60 ~ 49 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 60 ~ 59 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 45 56 60 ~ 48 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
19 28 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 28 fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP3:
17 17 21 25 27 27 28 28 28 28 29 29 30 30 ~ 26 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP3 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 94%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 94%

ARM Mali-G72 MP3lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet51
PUBG Mobile382829
World of Tanks Blitz6041
Arena of Valor5458
Shadow Fight 35658
Asphalt 9: Legends2826
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
3
1
1


2
3


1







ARM Mali-G71 MP8lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Arena of Valor5959
Shadow Fight 34449
Battle Bay5959
Dead Trigger 248
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4





4


1







Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 01:44:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8804 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7648 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731458675s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:17:12 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8804 +0.019s ... 0.046s

#9 got single benchmarks 8804 +0.039s ... 0.085s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7648 +0s ... 0.085s

#11 got single benchmarks 7648 +0.003s ... 0.088s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.088s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.105s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.106s

#15 Got 99 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.121s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.121s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.122s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.125s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.125s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.127s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)