Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G72 MP12 vs Qualcomm Adreno 643 vs ARM Mali-G78 MP24

ARM Mali-G72 MP12

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G72 MP12

Die ARM Mali-G72 MP12 ist eine integrierte High-End-Grafikeinheit für ARM-SoCs, die erstmals im Oktober 2017 im Smartphone- und Tablet-Chip Hisilicon Kirin 970 verbaut wurde. Unsere Benchmarks im Huawai Mate 10 Pro platzieren die GPU zwischen Adreno 530 und Adreno 540 und zählt damit zu einer der schnellsten Grafikeinheit für Android-Smartphones.

Die Mali-G72 basiert auf die 2. Generation der Bifrost Architektur welche Verbesserung bei der Machine Learning Effizienz und einen größeren Tile Buffer für 16x Anti-Aliasing mitbringt.

An Grafik-APIs unterstützt die G72 OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 und Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 643

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 643

Die Qualcomm Adreno 643 ist eine integrierte Grafikeinheit (iGPU), die im Qualcomm QCM6490 und QCS6490 zum Einsatz kommt. Das SoC ist nicht nur für den Einsatz in Android-basierten Smartphones und Tablets vorgesehen, sondern auch für IoT-Produkte mit Linux, Ubuntu oder Windows 11 IoT Enterprise. Im QCM6490 und QCS6490 taktet der Adreno 643 laut Qualcomm mit 812 MHz.

ARM Mali-G78 MP24

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G78 MP24

Die ARM Mali-G78MP24 ist eine integrierte High-End-Grafikeinheit für ARM-SoCs, die erstmals Ende 2020 im Smartphone- und Tablet-Chip HiSilicon Kirin 9000 verbaut wurde (z.B. Huawei Mate 40). Die G78MP24 integriert alle 24 Kerne/Cluster und nutzt die 2. Generation der Valhall-Architektur. Im Vergleich zur G77 bietet die G78 zwei neue Features: Asynchronous Top Level und Fragment Dependency Tracking.

Die GPU zählt damit zu den schnellsten Grafikkarten für Android-Smartphones in 2020 und daher sollten alle aktuellen Spiele flüssig dargestellt werden.

An Grafik-APIs unterstützt die G78 OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 und OpenCL 2.0.

show full text
ARM Mali-G72 MP12Qualcomm Adreno 643ARM Mali-G78 MP24
Mali-G Serie
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitekturBifrostValhall
Pipelines12 - unified24 - unified
Kerntakt850 MHz812 MHz
Shared Memoryneinjanein
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Vulkan 1.xOpenGL ES 3.2
Herstellungsprozess16 nm6 nm5 nm
Erscheinungsdatum18.10.2017 12.08.2021 26.05.2020
Herstellerseitedeveloper.arm.comwww.arm.com
CodenameValhall
CPU in Mali-G72 MP12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9708 x 2400 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 643GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm QCM64908 x 1960 MHz812 MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G78 MP24GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 90008 x 2050 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22429     avg: 32596     median: 33740 (3%)     max: 36231 Points
123332 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2021     avg: 3208.4     median: 3360.5 (20%)     max: 3710 Points
11895 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2062     avg: 3385.9     median: 3545 (12%)     max: 4040 Points
17612 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3135 Points (2%)
6923 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
887 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
8.2 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 8.4     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 8.7 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 10     avg: 20.6     median: 23 (2%)     max: 24 fps
49 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 20.4     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
40 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 33.9     median: 38.5 (3%)     max: 39 fps
69 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 23     avg: 54.6     median: 59 (3%)     max: 66 fps
90 fps (5%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP12
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 45     avg: 108     median: 118 (3%)     max: 125 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 643
159 fps (4%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
192996 Points (24%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
51.8 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
2937 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
3054 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
5.9 Watt (2%)
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 643:
58  fps
med.
Adreno 643:
40  fps
ultra
Adreno 643:
38  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G78 MP24:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32  fps
188%
Adreno 643:
60  fps
med.
Adreno 643:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
32 32 33 40 ~ 34 fps
118%
Adreno 643:
40  fps
118%
Mali-G78 MP24:
40  fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
31 55 ~ 43 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 54 58 58 ~ 50 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 59 ~ 37 fps
162%
Adreno 643:
60  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
30  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Mali-G72 MP12:
51  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G72 MP12 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 643 → 156%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 156%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G78 MP24 → 118%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 118%

Qualcomm Adreno 643lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact584038
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1

2


1
1

1







ARM Mali-G78 MP24lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile40
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps






1
1









ARM Mali-G72 MP12lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile3234
World of Tanks Blitz60
Arena of Valor4350
Shadow Fight 360
Dead Trigger 237
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Real Racing 351
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4
1




5
1

1







Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.28
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3070> for benchmark 201, setting:1057 +0s ... 0.059s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6499> for benchmark 201, setting:1057 +0s ... 0.059s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 9643> for benchmark 201, setting:1057 +0s ... 0.06s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3109> for benchmark 201, setting:1058 +0s ... 0.06s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7131> for benchmark 201, setting:1058 +0s ... 0.06s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 12146> for benchmark 201, setting:1058 +0s ... 0.061s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3487> for benchmark 201, setting:897 +0s ... 0.061s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 11256> for benchmark 201, setting:897 +0s ... 0.062s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3734> for benchmark 201, setting:915 +0s ... 0.062s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 16670> for benchmark 201, setting:915 +0s ... 0.063s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2999> for benchmark 201, setting:898 +0s ... 0.063s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 9138> for benchmark 201, setting:898 +0s ... 0.063s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3040> for benchmark 201, setting:917 +0s ... 0.064s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 11573> for benchmark 201, setting:917 +0s ... 0.064s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 25922> for benchmark 267, setting:765 +0s ... 0.076s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 39033> for benchmark 267, setting:764 +0s ... 0.076s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8180> for benchmark 200, setting:597 +0s ... 0.079s

#17 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3761> for benchmark 200, setting:598 +0s ... 0.079s

log 13. 05:16:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8138 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11804 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10564 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731471412s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8138 +0.031s ... 0.037s

#10 got single benchmarks 8138 +0.009s ... 0.046s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11804 +0s ... 0.046s

#12 got single benchmarks 11804 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10564 +0s ... 0.05s

#14 got single benchmarks 10564 +0.003s ... 0.053s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.055s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.057s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.057s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.058s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.058s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.058s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.059s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.059s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.06s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.06s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.06s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.061s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.061s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.062s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.062s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.063s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.063s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.063s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.064s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.064s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.065s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.067s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.069s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.069s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.07s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.07s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#46 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.073s

#47 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.073s

#48 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.074s

#49 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.074s

#50 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.075s

#51 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.075s

#52 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.076s

#53 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.076s

#54 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.076s

#55 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.077s

#56 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#57 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#58 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.079s

#59 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.079s

#60 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.08s

#61 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.08s

#62 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.08s

#63 Got 36 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.085s

#64 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.085s

#65 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.085s

#66 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.089s

#67 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.089s

#68 return log +0s ... 0.089s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)