Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G71 MP2 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L

ARM Mali-G71 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP2

Die ARM Mali-G71 MP2 ist eine integrierte Einstiegsgrafikkarte in ARM-SoCs. Sie wird z.B. in den Mediatek Helio P23 SoCs verbaut mit 700 bzw 770 MHz taktfrequenz. Die MP2 Variante der G71 verbaut 2 der 32 möglichen Grafikkerne und unterstützt OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 11 FL11_1, RenderScript.

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642L

Die Qualcomm Adreno 642L ist eine im Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G eingesetzte, ARM-SoC integrierte Grafikeinheit für Smartphones und Tablets. Der Chip ist ab Anfang 2021 erhältlich und wird hauptsächlich in Android-basierten Geräten der oberen Mittelklasse eingesetzt.

Laut Qualcomm bietet die Adreno 642L GPU eine um 40% höhere Performance als die alte Adreno 620 im Snapdragon 768G (vs 50% im Adreno 642). Dies wird auch durch den schnellen Speicherkontroller mit LPDDR5-Unterstützung ermöglicht.

Für Gaming unterstützt der Chip Variable Rate Shading und Qualcomm Game Quick Touch.

Die Grafikkarte unterstützt OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.1. 

show full text
ARM Mali-G71 MP2Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Adreno 600 Serie
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
CodenameMimir
ArchitekturBifrost
Pipelines2 - unified
Kerntakt770 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryneinja
APIOpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2
Herstellungsprozess16 nm6 nm
Erscheinungsdatum03.06.2016 07.05.2021
Herstellerseitewww.arm.com
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Mali-G71 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 78858 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 79048 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T8 x 2300 MHz770 MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? - 770 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 770 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 642L
0.4 pt (1%)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
0.06593 -82%
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
0.09955 -73%
Qualcomm Adreno 540
0.227 -38%
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3681
...
Qualcomm Adreno 642L
0.3681 0%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 8946%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 1152     avg: 11630     median: 11251.5 (1%)     max: 15567 Points
min: 46148     avg: 74921     median: 88482 (9%)     max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
13392 Points (2%)
30747 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
4790 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
5577 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
782 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
832 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
37738 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 629     avg: 779     median: 742 (3%)     max: 1097 Points
min: 6398     avg: 6666     median: 6638 (29%)     max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 564     avg: 680     median: 642 (1%)     max: 971 Points
min: 7199     avg: 7627     median: 7536 (17%)     max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 431     avg: 528     median: 507 (3%)     max: 737 Points
min: 5032     avg: 5413     median: 5393.5 (27%)     max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 371     avg: 443.3     median: 419 (1%)     max: 629 Points
min: 5103     avg: 5654     median: 5612 (17%)     max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 70     avg: 669     median: 725 (6%)     max: 1001 Points
min: 6320     avg: 6409     median: 6358 (56%)     max: 6798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 55     avg: 579     median: 623 (4%)     max: 879 Points
min: 7138     avg: 7328     median: 7238 (43%)     max: 8182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 68     avg: 480.3     median: 486 (2%)     max: 741 Points
min: 4967     avg: 5076     median: 5031.5 (25%)     max: 5385 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 53     avg: 404.4     median: 402 (1%)     max: 634 Points
min: 5134     avg: 5267     median: 5205 (17%)     max: 5807 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 2321     avg: 2517     median: 2493.5 (1%)     max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 681     avg: 696     median: 687.5 (1%)     max: 768 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1038 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
968 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
7.2 fps (0%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.4     avg: 1.6     median: 1.5 (0%)     max: 2.4 fps
min: 13     avg: 13.6     median: 13.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 3.8     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (0%)     max: 5 fps
min: 34     avg: 36.4     median: 36 (3%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 2.6     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (0%)     max: 6 fps
min: 33     avg: 33.7     median: 33 (4%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 4.3     avg: 7     median: 6.6 (0%)     max: 9.9 fps
min: 56     avg: 57.7     median: 57 (1%)     max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 7     avg: 11     median: 11 (1%)     max: 16 fps
min: 77     avg: 79.1     median: 78 (5%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP2
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 14     avg: 22.1     median: 22 (0%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 81     avg: 131.6     median: 133 (1%)     max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 135972     avg: 157798     median: 157454 (20%)     max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 45.96     avg: 49.6     median: 46.9 (0%)     max: 54.4 fps
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
42 Samples/s (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
53 Samples/s (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
944 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2471     avg: 4582     median: 4550 (2%)     max: 6755 Points
min: 23666     avg: 31803     median: 30994 (11%)     max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1205     avg: 1444     median: 1451.5 (2%)     max: 1668 Points
min: 26134     avg: 36660     median: 40236 (67%)     max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4.3     median: 4 (2%)     max: 9.27 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 1006% n=18

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
Adreno 642L:
61  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 642L:
60 60 60 60 89 99 103 119 120 121 ~ 89 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
30  fps
193%
Adreno 642L:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
26 29 30 ~ 28 fps
143%
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
21 29 29 30 ~ 27 fps
141%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
30 58 60 60 ~ 52 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
60  fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
60  fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
47  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
Adreno 642L:
33.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 642L:
25  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 642L:
14.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 642L:
13  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
46 48 54 60 ~ 52 fps
115%
Adreno 642L:
60  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
23 30 ~ 27 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
28 29 29 30 ~ 29 fps
103%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
23 24 25 28 29 29 ~ 26 fps
115%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G71 MP2:
59  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 642L:
90  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP2 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 135%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 148%

Qualcomm Adreno 642Llowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal5956
League of Legends: Wild Rift61
Armajet89
PUBG Mobile584038
Dota 2 Reborn33.72514.813
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4

1
1

1
2
3
1
1
1






ARM Mali-G71 MP2lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile302827
Arena of Valor6052
Shadow Fight 36060
Battle Bay47
Dead Trigger 252
Asphalt 8: Airborne3027
Asphalt 9: Legends2926
Temple Run 259
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
2
2
1


3
3
1

1







Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 20. 15:37:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8348 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726839451s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8348 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 8348 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.002s ... 0.008s

#11 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.028s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.028s

#15 Got 89 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 0.044s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.044s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.045s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.049s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.049s

#20 return log +0.027s ... 0.077s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)