Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8735 vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison  MT8735

Der Mediatek MT8735 ist ein 2015 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Mittelklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er wird in 28 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,3 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine ARM Mali-T720MP2 zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem inkl. CDMA2000 und 5GHz Dual-Band 802.11bgn WiFi. 

Die Leistung liegt im Bereich der älteren MT6735 (jedoch mit bis zu 1.5 GHz getaktet) SoCs im Einstiegsbereich.

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7900

Der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 ist ein High-End-Desktop-Prozessor der Raphael Serie mit 12-Kernen und Hyperthreading (SMT), womit dieser in Summe bis zu 24 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeiten kann. Mit der Vorstellung Anfang 2023 ist der Ryzen 9 7900 der schnellste 12-Kern-Prozessor mit 65 Watt TDP. 

Der Ryzen 9 7900 taktet mit 3,7 GHz Basistakt und erreicht im Turbo bis zu 5,4 GHz auf einem Kern. Dies ist auch der Unterschied zum höher getaktetem Ryzen 9 7900X.

Der interne Aufbau des Prozessors hat sich auf den ersten Blick nicht grundlegend verändert. Der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 basiert weiterhin auf dem Chiplet-Design bestehend aus zwei CCD-Clustern, welche jeweils einen CCX mit 8-Kernen beinhalten. Mit 5 nm wurde allerdings der Fertigungsprozess verkleinert, wodurch die höheren Taktraten zu gewährleisten sind. Weiterhin gibt es den IO-Die, der unter anderem den Speichercontroller sowie die iGPU beinhaltet. Dieser wird nunmehr in 6 nm Strukturbreite gefertigt.

In Spielen kann der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 dank der deutlich verbesserten IPC überzeugen. 

ModelMediatek MT8735AMD Ryzen 9 7900
CodenameCortex-A53Raphael (Zen4)
Series MediatekAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
Serie: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 « 3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock1300 MHz3700 - 5400 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 412 / 24
Technology28 nm5 nm
Features4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/BaidouMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
iGPUARM Mali-T720AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) ( - 2200 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache768 KB
L2 Cache12 MB
L3 Cache64 MB
TDP65 Watt
Transistors9.9 Million
Voltage0.650 - 1.475V V
Die Size262 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900
46.1 pt (77%)
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
46.1
max:
60.1 30%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
24776 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
1966 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 R9 7900 +
762 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 R9 7900 +
9703 Points (24%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R9 7900 +
4020 Points (25%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R9 7900 +
315 Points (88%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R9 7900 +
45.3 Points (59%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R9 7900 +
3.7 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 R9 7900 +
8339 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 R9 7900 +
60934 Points (44%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
46.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 R9 7900 +
10154 Points (16%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 R9 7900 +
112881 MIPS (65%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 R9 7900 +
7936 MIPS (94%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 R9 7900 +
207 fps (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 R9 7900 +
355.5 fps (82%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 R9 7900 +
31.2 fps (55%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 R9 7900 +
2 GB/s (59%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 R9 7900 +
3.1 GB/s (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 R9 7900 +
21.5 GB/s (56%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
199 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
125 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R9 7900 +
19451 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
329 s (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 R9 7900 +
26325 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (9%)     max: 11114 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 R9 7900 +
14817 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (10%)     max: 864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (10%)     max: 931 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
2203 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
17880 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
2096 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
17581 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (6%)     max: 647 Points
8861 Points (88%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833 Points
65241 Points (65%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
597 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
1651 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199 (15%)     max: 13705 ms
452 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 R9 7900 +
302 Points (85%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 R9 7900 +
366 Points (67%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 R9 7900 +
2322 Points (89%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
203 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
196.9 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
106.9 Watt (71%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R9 7900 +
20.4 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900 → 2684% n=3

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 25. 04:41:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15014 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732506067s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:17:24 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15014 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 15014 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.041s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.041s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.042s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.042s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.042s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.045s

#18 return log +0.016s ... 0.061s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)