Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8735 vs Mediatek Helio P65

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison MT8735

Der Mediatek MT8735 ist ein 2015 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Mittelklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er wird in 28 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,3 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine ARM Mali-T720MP2 zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem inkl. CDMA2000 und 5GHz Dual-Band 802.11bgn WiFi. 

Die Leistung liegt im Bereich der älteren MT6735 (jedoch mit bis zu 1.5 GHz getaktet) SoCs im Einstiegsbereich.

Mediatek Helio P65

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio P65

Der MediaTek Helio P65 ist ein Mitte 2019 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Mittelklasse, der sowohl in Smartphones als auch Tablets (hauptsächlich Android) eingesetzt werden kann. Er wird in 12 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über acht CPU-Kerne in zwei Cluster. Zwei große ARM Cortex-A75 Performance-Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz und vier ARM Cortex-A55 Stromspar-Kerne. Weiters integriert der Prozessor ein Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE Modem (4G) und eine ARM Mali-G52MP2 mit bis zu 820 MHz. Auch eine AI Processing Unit ist laut Mediatek verbaut.

Der SoC wird im 12nm (12FFC) Prozess bei TSMC produziert und sollte dadurch eine gute Energieeffizienz aufweisen.

show full text
ModelMediatek MT8735Mediatek Helio P65
Series MediatekMediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P90 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio P65 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G88 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G85 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G80 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio G70 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1300 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm12 nm
Features4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/Baidou2x ARM Cortex-A75, 6x ARM Cortex-A55
iGPUARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (820 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P65
0.4 pt (34%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -63%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -34%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -31%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -29%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -29%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 -25%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 -24%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 -16%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 -7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 -1%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 4%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 4%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 5%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 5%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 6%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 7%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 7%
UNISOC T618
0.475 7%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 193%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (9%)     max: 11114 Points
min: 13952     avg: 15592     median: 15591.5 (13%)     max: 17231 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (10%)     max: 864 Points
min: 2364     avg: 2396     median: 2395.5 (28%)     max: 2427 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (10%)     max: 931 Points
min: 2318     avg: 2392     median: 2392 (27%)     max: 2466 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 351     avg: 354     median: 354 (14%)     max: 357 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1222     avg: 1240     median: 1239.5 (2%)     max: 1257 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
357 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1211 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (6%)     max: 647 Points
1711 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833 Points
5097 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
597 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
1651 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5076 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1726 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2564 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4383 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10035 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4526 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6229 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199 (15%)     max: 13705 ms
min: 3779     avg: 4074     median: 4074 (5%)     max: 4369 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
min: 10422     avg: 10461     median: 10460.5 (9%)     max: 10499 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 51     avg: 51.5     median: 51.5 (9%)     max: 52 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
32430 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
32472 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
32053 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
60518 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
157473 Points (15%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
6412 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
min: 6291     avg: 6517     median: 6516.5 (43%)     max: 6742 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points
7594 Points (38%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3553 Points (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
8280 Points (18%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P65 → 267% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 14. 05:43:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12257 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731559413s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.007s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12257 +0.003s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 12257 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.013s ... 0.034s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.034s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.034s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.04s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)