Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8735 vs Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison MT8735

Der Mediatek MT8735 ist ein 2015 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Mittelklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er wird in 28 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,3 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine ARM Mali-T720MP2 zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem inkl. CDMA2000 und 5GHz Dual-Band 802.11bgn WiFi. 

Die Leistung liegt im Bereich der älteren MT6735 (jedoch mit bis zu 1.5 GHz getaktet) SoCs im Einstiegsbereich.

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

show full text
ModelMediatek MT8735Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series Mediatek Mediatek
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87351.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1300 MHz2300 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm16 nm
Features4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/BaidouPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X
iGPUARM Mali-T720PowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -51%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -40%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -36%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -31%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -12%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -8%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 0%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 32%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 32%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 37%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 38%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 39%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 40%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 288%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (9%)     max: 11114 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (10%)     max: 864 Points
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (10%)     max: 931 Points
806 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (6%)     max: 647 Points
842 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833 Points
3870 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
597 Points (8%)
813 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1651 Points (4%)
3775 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199 (15%)     max: 13705 ms
12972 ms (15%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
35 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
4895 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (21%)     max: 5221 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 152% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 20:59:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732219143s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.006s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.029s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.031s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.031s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.031s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.032s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.032s

#21 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.036s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.039s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)