Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek MT8317T vs MediaTek MT8377

MediaTek MT8317T

► remove from comparison  MT8317T

Der Mediatek MT8317T ist ein günstiger SoC für Android Smartphones und Tablets. Er basiert wahrscheinlich auf den Mediatek MT6577 (wird als dieser erkannt), jedoch ist die Taktrate mit 1.2 GHz etwas höher. Die CPU Kerne basieren auf die Cortex-A9 Architektur. Weiters ist eine PowerVR SGX531 Grafikkarte verbaut.

MediaTek MT8377

► remove from comparison  MT8377

Der Mediatek MT8377 ist ein günstiger SoC für Android Smartphones und Tablets.  Er bietet zwei Cortex-A9 Rechenkerne mit 1 - 1.2 GHz Taktfrequenz und eine PowerVR SGX531 Grafikkarte. Weiters findet man ein 3G/HSPA Modem, Bluetooth 4.0, WLAN und 1080p Video-Decoder im SoC.

ModelMediaTek MT8317TMediaTek MT8377
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Series Mediatek Mediatek
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT83771.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8317T « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6577 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6575 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8377 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8317T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6577 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6575 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1200 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
iGPUPowerVR SGX531PowerVR SGX531
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
Technology40 nm
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT8317T +
3555 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 274     avg: 301     median: 301 (2%)     max: 328 Points
377 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 620     avg: 723     median: 723 (7%)     max: 826 Points
785 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1218     avg: 1257     median: 1256.5 (2%)     max: 1295 Points
1446 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 726     avg: 729     median: 728.5 (1%)     max: 731 Points
837 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 833     avg: 869     median: 869 (2%)     max: 905 Points
993 Points (3%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 37.33     avg: 52.8     median: 52.8 (2%)     max: 68.2 MFLOPS
67.7 MFLOPS (2%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.8     avg: 38.5     median: 38.5 (4%)     max: 39.28 MFLOPS
42.6 MFLOPS (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8317T +
1347 ms (15%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1000     avg: 1198     median: 1197.5 (11%)     max: 1395 ms
1891 ms (18%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 3060     avg: 3152     median: 3152 (7%)     max: 3244 points
3024 points (7%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 3201     avg: 3212     median: 3212 (21%)     max: 3223 Points
2993 Points (19%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8317T +
199 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8317T +
4404 Iter./s (14%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8317T +
4319 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8317T → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8377 → 107% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 03. 19:05:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3715 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4139 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733249130s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:18:52 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3715 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 3715 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 4139 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 4139 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.021s

#13 return log +0.016s ... 0.037s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)