Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz vs Intel Core i5-11400T

MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz

► remove from comparison

Der MediaTek MT8163 V/B ist ein ARM basierender SoC für (Android) Tablets. Er bietet vier ARM Cortex-A53 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 1.3 GHz, eine ARM Mali-T720 MP2 Grafikkarte mit 520 MHz (Benchmarks) und einen DDR3x32 1600Mbps Speicherkontroller. An drahtlosen Schnittstellen bietet der SoC Bluetooth 4.0, Dual Band 802.11 b/g/n WLAN, FM und GPS.

Im Vergleich zum schnelleren MediaTek MT8163 V/A taktet die CPU niedriger (1,3 versus 1,5 GHz) und auch die GPU (520 versus 600 MHz).

Die vier 64 Bit Cortex-A53 Kerne positionieren den SoC im Einstiegs-Mittelklasse Bereich in 2015.

Intel Core i5-11400T

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11400T

Der Intel Core i5-11400T ist ein sparsamer Sechs-Kern-Prozessor auf Basis der Rocket-Lake-Architektur, die im März 2021 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit einem Basistakt von 1,3 GHz und erreicht unter Last einen All-Core-Boost von 3,7 GHz. Auf Hyperthreading muss man auch bei den sparsamen T-CPUs nicht verzichten, womit der i5-11400T in Summe bis zu 12 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeiten kann. Gefertigt wird der Intel Core i5-11400T, im 14-nm-Prozess.

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-10400T bietet der Core i5-11400T eine deutlich bessere IPC. Das zeigt sich deutlich in den Single-Core-Benchmarks. Aber auch die Multi-Core-Performance profitiert von der besseren IPC im Vergleich zu Comet-Lake. Ein Leistungsplus von bis zu 20 Prozent kann erwartet werden.

Grafikeinheit

Wie auch der Intel Core i7-10400T bietet auch der Intel Core i7-11400T eine integrierte Grafikeinheit die auf den Namen Intel UHD Graphics 730 hört. Im Core i5-11400T arbeitet sie mit 350 - 1200 MHz und bietet alle 24 EUs.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP fällt mit 35 Watt relativ gering aus. Dies ist der PL1-Wert. Für den Turbo bietet der Intel Core i5-11400T mit dem PL2 eine höhere TDP von bis zu 84 Watt. Für genau 28 Sekunden (Tau) dürfen die vollen 84 Watt verwendet werden, wenn es die Bedingungen zulassen.

ModelMediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHzIntel Core i5-11400T
SeriesMediatek Intel Rocket Lake
CodenameCortex-A53Rocket Lake
Serie: Rocket Lake Rocket Lake
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113T compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113L compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A53
Intel Core i9-11900K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-11700 compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11600K compare3.9 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400F compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-11400T « 1.3 - 3.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1300 MHz1300 - 3700 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 46 / 12
Technology28 nm14 nm
FeaturesDDR3x32 memory controller 1600Mbps, T720 MP2@520MHz, internal Display up to 1366x768, HMID up to 1080p, H.265 1080p video decode, 13MP image signal processor, WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n, embedded GPS module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM TrustZoneDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, 8 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 (520 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) (350 - 1200 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
L1 Cache480 KB
L2 Cache3 MB
L3 Cache12 MB
TDP35 Watt
Die Size276 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA1200
$182 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-11400T
26.3 pt (44%)
Intel Core i5-11400T
26.3
max:
60.1 129%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3891 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
972 Points (41%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
378 Points (42%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1500 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
642 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
153 Points (43%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7.3 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6122 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
20362 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
25835 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8290 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
261.3 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4409 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
19699 MIPS (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4157 MIPS (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
40 fps (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
154.5 fps (36%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
5.2 fps (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.6 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.2 GB/s (11%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
704 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
7263 Points (15%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
10.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
543 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25621 Points (20%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
7319 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
50228 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
50210 Points (41%)
53123 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6654 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
10064 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3510 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1130 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3495 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 639     median: 640 (6%)     max: 648 Points
4855 Points (48%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1683     avg: 1754     median: 1767 (2%)     max: 1797 Points
17082 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
601 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1583 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1888     avg: 1930     median: 1930 (3%)     max: 1972 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 617     avg: 638     median: 638 (10%)     max: 659 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11818     avg: 13133     median: 13321.5 (16%)     max: 14321 ms
887 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2821     avg: 2929     median: 2853.5 (2%)     max: 3320 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23 (4%)     max: 25 Points
208 Points (38%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2907     avg: 3177     median: 3219.5 (21%)     max: 3361 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1125 Points (43%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.3 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
57.8 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.9 Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
11.1 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11400T → 930% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 16. 14:21:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8108 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14535 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731763308s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8108 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#8 got single benchmarks 8108 +0.008s ... 0.04s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14535 +0.008s ... 0.047s

#10 got single benchmarks 14535 +0.004s ... 0.051s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.082s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.085s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)