Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT6739WW vs Unisoc T7200

Mediatek MT6739WW

► remove from comparison MT6739WW

Der Mediatek MT6739WW ist ein 2017 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Einstiegsklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,5 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine PowerVR GE8100 mit maximal 570 MHz Taktrate zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL), WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n sowie ein Videodecoder mit Ultra-HD- und H.265-Unterstützung. Der Unterschied zum normalen Mediatek MT6739 ist nicht bekannt, die Leistung ist vergleichbar.

Unisoc T7200

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7200

Der Unisoc T7200 (ehemals Unisoc T606) ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,6 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit ebenfalls bis zu 1,6 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kerne und 650 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

show full text
ModelMediatek MT6739WWUnisoc T7200
Series MediatekUNISOC
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 « 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1500 MHz1600 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm12 nm
Features4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPUARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUPowerVR GE8100 ( - 570 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP1 (650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com
L3 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
10230 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
655 Points (8%)
min: 2484     avg: 2625     median: 2648.5 (31%)     max: 2697 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
669 Points (8%)
min: 2489     avg: 2604     median: 2626 (30%)     max: 2673 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 368     avg: 375.4     median: 377 (10%)     max: 380 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 1285     avg: 1364     median: 1364 (5%)     max: 1482 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 273     avg: 305.9     median: 309 (12%)     max: 313 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 708     avg: 1206     median: 1245 (2%)     max: 1324 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
589 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1718 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
614 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1681 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1525 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
549 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
653 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1791 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2544 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1355 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1788 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16008 ms (19%)
min: 2903.5     avg: 3045     median: 3017.2 (4%)     max: 3186.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
3213 Points (3%)
min: 2228     avg: 11332     median: 12296 (10%)     max: 13455 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 51     avg: 52.6     median: 52 (15%)     max: 56 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
27 Points (5%)
min: 70     avg: 77.8     median: 77.5 (14%)     max: 86 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
3565 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
14593 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
3084 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
22448 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
43690 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
155928 Points (15%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 202973     avg: 221439     median: 217160 (13%)     max: 238808 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 59826     avg: 64551     median: 61167.5 (17%)     max: 82626 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
49040 Points (6%)
1218 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2260 Points (12%)
4923 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
1839 Points (4%)
10422 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
0 Points (0%)
7100 Points (46%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4408 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 20.9     avg: 50.9     median: 57.6 (42%)     max: 69.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 154.5     avg: 351.3     median: 197.5 (6%)     max: 703 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 16.4     avg: 25.5     median: 25.3 (31%)     max: 42.1 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 192.4     avg: 574     median: 675 (19%)     max: 824 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 8373     avg: 16495     median: 17396 (28%)     max: 25251 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 6637     avg: 7338     median: 7259 (30%)     max: 8303 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 339     avg: 349.4     median: 348 (13%)     max: 362 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2.68     avg: 4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 0.991     avg: 1.6     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 3.12 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6739WW → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7200 → 348% n=8

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 14. 17:43:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11387 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14018 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731602600s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11387 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#8 got single benchmarks 11387 +0.005s ... 0.035s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14018 +0.001s ... 0.036s

#10 got single benchmarks 14018 +0.024s ... 0.06s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 0.078s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.083s

#14 return log +0.002s ... 0.086s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)