Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT6739 vs UNISOC T610

Mediatek MT6739

► remove from comparison MT6739

Der Mediatek MT6739 ist ein 2017 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Einstiegsklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,5 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine PowerVR GE8100 mit maximal 570 MHz Taktrate zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL), WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n sowie ein Videodecoder mit Ultra-HD- und H.265-Unterstützung.

UNISOC T610

► remove from comparison UNISOC T610

Der Unisoc T610 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und 614 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

show full text
ModelMediatek MT6739UNISOC T610
Series MediatekUNISOC
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1500 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm12 nm
Features4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPUARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUPowerVR GE8100 ( - 570 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (614 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com
L3 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T610
0.5 pt (36%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -65%
...
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 -28%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 -28%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 -20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 -5%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 -5%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 -1%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 0%
UNISOC T610
0.4653
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 1%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 2%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 2%
UNISOC T618
0.475 2%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 3%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 3%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 3%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 179%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 7103     avg: 9367     median: 9264 (8%)     max: 10981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 573     avg: 614     median: 612.5 (7%)     max: 677 Points
465%
T610 +
min: 2784     avg: 2944     median: 2848 (34%)     max: 3200 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 530     avg: 615     median: 617.5 (7%)     max: 698 Points
484%
T610 +
min: 2791     avg: 2986     median: 2986 (34%)     max: 3181 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T610 +
min: 345     avg: 357.3     median: 348.5 (14%)     max: 387 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T610 +
min: 1034     avg: 1264     median: 1298.5 (2%)     max: 1425 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 571     avg: 632     median: 653 (7%)     max: 675 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 1418     avg: 1733     median: 1779 (2%)     max: 1896 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 13599     avg: 16427     median: 16545.5 (19%)     max: 18154 ms
538%
T610 +
3075 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2093     avg: 2945     median: 3126 (3%)     max: 3386 Points
382%
T610 +
11952 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T610 +
53 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 23     avg: 25     median: 25 (5%)     max: 27 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 25012     avg: 33655     median: 34225 (12%)     max: 38060 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 3811     avg: 4588     median: 4560 (14%)     max: 5263 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 12204     avg: 14766     median: 14716 (18%)     max: 16571 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 0     avg: 3951     median: 3086 (1%)     max: 18182 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 2443     avg: 18691     median: 21640 (13%)     max: 22562 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 26874     avg: 41995     median: 43387 (8%)     max: 46951 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 T610 +
39058 Points (33%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 T610 +
39644 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 T610 +
27469 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 T610 +
65175 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T610 +
min: 171346     avg: 173534     median: 173534 (17%)     max: 175722 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T610 +
min: 162968     avg: 181377     median: 181377 (11%)     max: 199786 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T610 +
min: 62063     avg: 63978     median: 63977.5 (18%)     max: 65892 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T610 +
1942 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
0 min (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2288 Points (12%)
234%
T610 +
5364 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 3109     avg: 3743     median: 3742.5 (8%)     max: 4376 Points
429%
T610 +
16046 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2467     avg: 3206     median: 3142.5 (21%)     max: 5377 Points
233%
T610 +
7337 Points (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 3742     avg: 4323     median: 4298 (22%)     max: 5136 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T610 +
min: 7645     avg: 8075     median: 8074.5 (34%)     max: 8504 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T610 +
356 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T610 +
8.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T610 +
2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6739 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T610 → 395% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 02:30:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9972 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14014 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731461413s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9972 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 9972 +0.018s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14014 +0.002s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 14014 +0s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.034s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.038s

#14 return log +0.002s ... 0.04s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)