Notebookcheck Logo

Renesas MP5232 vs Google Tensor G4 vs unknown

Renesas MP5232

► remove from comparison  MP5232

Der Renesas MP5232 ist ein günstiger Dual-Core ARM SoC mit LTE Unterstützung. Er zielt hauptsächlich auf Einstiegs-LTE-Smartphones mit Android im Bereich von 150 - 300 Euro ab. Als Prozessorpart sind zwei ARM Cortex-A9 mit bis zu 1.5 GHz integriert. Im Samsung Galaxy Core LTE SM-G386F werden diese jedoch z.B. nur mit maximal 1.2 GHz betrieben. Weiters findet man eine PowerVR SGX544 Grafikkarte und die oben erwähnten LTE Cat. 4 und 3G (DC-HSPA+, Edge) Einheiten im SoC. Auch ein integrierter 1080p Video De- und Encoder, 20 MP ISP und Audio Subsystem sind im MP5232 verbaut.

Quellen: Test Samsung Galaxy Core LTE SM-G386F, Renesas

Google Tensor G4

► remove from comparison

The Google Tensor G4 is the processor powering Pixel 9 series phones that debuted in August 2024. It certainly is well-connected, with both 5G and Wi-Fi 7 onboard. According to reports, the chip is built using one of Samsung's 4 nm processes making for decent power efficiency, as of late 2024.

The CPU part of the SoC is made up of 8 cores. The Cortex-X4 reportedly runs at 3.1 GHz and is the fastest of the bunch. Then there are also 3 Cortex-A720 cores (2.6 GHz) and 4 very frugal Cortex-A520 cores (1.95 GHz). This setup is only just enough for middling benchmark scores that are a far cry from what the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, not to mention the A18 Pro deliver.

The G715 MP7 reportedly serves as the graphics adapter.

ModelRenesas MP5232Google Tensor G4unknown
Series Google
CodenameCortex-A9
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Google Tensor G4 « 1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown «  cores
Clock1500 MHz1950 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 28 / 8
1 x ARM Cortex-A520
3 x ARM Cortex-A720
4 x ARM Cortex-X4
ArchitectureARMARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.renesas.com
Technology4 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G715 MP7

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MP5232 +
4163 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 MP5232 +
4147 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1950 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4741 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MP5232 +
654 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MP5232 +
373 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 MP5232 +
70.2 MFLOPS (2%)
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 MP5232 +
11.7 MFLOPS (1%)
109%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MP5232 +
21760 ms (25%)
147%
1 unknown +
min: 14670     avg: 14812     median: 14811.5 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MP5232 +
1525 ms (17%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MP5232 +
1480 ms (14%)
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 MP5232 +
1547 Points (1%)
178%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 2740     median: 2753 (2%)     max: 2794 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MP5232 +
3959 points (9%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 MP5232 +
12246 Points (28%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MP5232 +
209 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MP5232 +
4260 Iter./s (14%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MP5232 +
4557 Points (1%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1081 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
6.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
0.6 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Renesas MP5232 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 09. 14:23:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5844 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18012 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728476586s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5844 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 5844 +0s ... 0.004s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18012 +0s ... 0.004s

#11 got single benchmarks 18012 +0s ... 0.004s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0s ... 0.004s

#13 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.091s ... 0.096s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.098s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.098s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.104s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.105s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.105s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.105s

#21 return log +0s ... 0.105s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)