Notebookcheck Logo

Renesas MP5232 vs Apple A18 Pro

Renesas MP5232

MP5232

Der Renesas MP5232 ist ein günstiger Dual-Core ARM SoC mit LTE Unterstützung. Er zielt hauptsächlich auf Einstiegs-LTE-Smartphones mit Android im Bereich von 150 - 300 Euro ab. Als Prozessorpart sind zwei ARM Cortex-A9 mit bis zu 1.5 GHz integriert. Im Samsung Galaxy Core LTE SM-G386F werden diese jedoch z.B. nur mit maximal 1.2 GHz betrieben. Weiters findet man eine PowerVR SGX544 Grafikkarte und die oben erwähnten LTE Cat. 4 und 3G (DC-HSPA+, Edge) Einheiten im SoC. Auch ein integrierter 1080p Video De- und Encoder, 20 MP ISP und Audio Subsystem sind im MP5232 verbaut.

Quellen: Test Samsung Galaxy Core LTE SM-G386F, Renesas

Apple A18 Pro

► remove from comparison Apple A18 Pro

the A18 scores 8085, while the A18 Pro earns a score of 8408

show full text
ModelRenesas MP5232Apple A18 Pro
Series Apple
CodenameCortex-A9
Serie:
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Apple A18 compare - 3.8 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 Pro « - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Clock1500 MHz <=4000 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 26 / 6
2 x 4.0 GHz Apple A18 P-Core
4 x Apple A18 E-Core
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.renesas.com
TDP Turbo PL210 Watt
Technology3 nm
Features16-core Neural Engine, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MP5232 +
4163 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 MP5232 +
4147 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MP5232 +
654 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MP5232 +
373 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 MP5232 +
70.2 MFLOPS (2%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 MP5232 +
11.7 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MP5232 +
21760 ms (25%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MP5232 +
1525 ms (17%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MP5232 +
1480 ms (14%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 MP5232 +
1547 Points (1%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MP5232 +
3959 points (9%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 MP5232 +
12246 Points (28%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MP5232 +
209 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MP5232 +
4260 Iter./s (14%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MP5232 +
4557 Points (1%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 A18 Pro +
5.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 A18 Pro +
0.6 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Renesas MP5232 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 28. 05:19:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5844 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18006 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1727493555s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Sep 2024 05:16:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5844 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 5844 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18006 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 18006 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.019s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.021s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)