Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Turion II M540 vs AMD Turion II M500

AMD Turion II M540

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Turion II Ultra M540 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkern Prozessor von AMD. Er basiert auf den Caspian getauften Kern, welcher wahrscheinlich nur teilweise auf die K10 Architektur basiert. Jedoch bietet er im Vergleich zu den Ultra CPUs nur 1MB shared Level 2 Cache. In dem Prozessor integriert ist ein DDR2-800 Speicherkontroller (400 MHz). Verglichen mit Intel CPUs, ist der Turion II Ultra M540 etwas langsamer als Core 2 Duo / Pentium mit 2.4 GHz und der selben Menge an Cache.

AMD Turion II M500

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Turion II Ultra M500 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkern Prozessor von AMD. Er basiert auf den Caspian getauften Kern, welcher wahrscheinlich (teilweise) auf die K10 Architektur basiert. Jedoch bietet er im Vergleich zu den Ultra CPUs nur 1MB shared Level 2 Cache. In dem Prozessor integriert ist ein DDR2 Speicherkontroller (400 MHz).

Die Performance des M500 befindet sich nur auf Höhe eines 2 Ghz Pentium Dual Core T3200 mit ebenfalls 1MB Level 2 Cache.

show full text
ModelAMD Turion II M540AMD Turion II M500
CodenameCaspianCaspian
SeriesAMD Turion IIAMD Turion II
Serie: Turion II Caspian
AMD Turion II M560 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M540 « 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M520 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M5002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M560 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M5402.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M520 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II M500 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2400 MHz2200 MHz
FSB36003600
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-PinSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-Pin
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 M500 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 M500 +
min: 1825     avg: 1856     median: 1864.5 (11%)     max: 1869 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 M500 +
min: 3560     avg: 3592     median: 3591 (3%)     max: 3626 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 M500 +
4370 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 M500 +
2332 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 1124     avg: 1125     median: 1124.5 (13%)     max: 1125 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 34.5     avg: 34.8     median: 34.8 (7%)     max: 35.01 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 M500 +
min: 1748     avg: 1772     median: 1756 (4%)     max: 1829 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 35.6     avg: 36.1     median: 36.3 (8%)     max: 36.33 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 83     avg: 83.1     median: 83.1 (4%)     max: 83.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 M500 +
min: 1920     avg: 1929     median: 1929 (9%)     max: 1938 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 M500 +
15570 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 M500 +
13530 MFLOPS (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 M500 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 M500 +
3493 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Turion II M500 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 15:09:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 958 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 509 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732198182s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 958 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 958 +0.003s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 509 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#10 got single benchmarks 509 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.018s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.02s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)