Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA T600
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU ► remove from comparison
Die Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU ist eine von Apple selbst designte Grafikkarte im Apple M2 Max SoC und laut Apple mit allen 38 Kernen. Die GPU hat keinen dedizierten Grafikspeicher aber kann auf den schnellen gemeinsamen LPDDR5-6400? Speicher (unified Memory, 32 bis 96 GB, 400 GBit Bandbreite) zugreifen.
Neu ist beim M2 Pro und Max der Support für HDMI 2.1 (8K Displays).
Die iGPU unterstützt Apple's Metal 2 Schnittstelle und dürfte eine ähnliche Architektur wie die älteren PowerVR Grafikeinheiten (z.B. im Apple A10 ) aufweisen.
Da der SoC im 5nm Prozess bei TSMC hergestellt wird, sollte die Energieeffizienz hervorragend sein. Laut powermetrics braucht die GPU bis zu 53,6 Watt (Chip inkl. CPU gesamt 89 Watt).
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für große und schwere Notebooks. Sie positioniert sich mit ihren 2560 Shadern zwischen der Consumer RTX 2070 (2304) und RTX 2080 (2944) und dürfte daher den TU104 Chip nutzen.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Features
Der TU104-Chip wird in 12nm gefertigt und bietet eine Reihe neuer Features, wie DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) und Real Time Ray Tracing. Dadurch lassen sich vor allem Beleuchtungseffekte sehr viel realistischer darstellen. Weiterhin gibt es Support für DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) sowie H.265 Video De- und Encoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
Die Performance sollte sich zwischen der RTX 5000 / GTX 2080 und RTX 3000 / GTX 2070 einpendeln. Bei professionellen Anwendungen können die Quadro-Treiber zu einer höheren Performance führen und Nvidia bewirbt die Quadro-Linie auch mit den höheren VRAM Ausstattungen, die sich bei manchen Workflows deutlich auswirken können.
Mit einem TDP von 110 Watt eignet sich die Quadro RTX 4000 nur für große und schwere Notebooks.
NVIDIA T600 ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia T600 Desktop ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für kleine Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf dem selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce GTX1650 . Jedoch kommt der TU 117 nur mit 640 Shadern und einem 128 Bit Speicherbus daher. Beim verbauten Speicher muss man sich mit den 4-GB-GDDR6 arrangieren Die TDP ist 40 Watt spezifiziert.
Die professionellen Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000 ) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) NVIDIA T600 Quadro Turing Serie Pipelines 38 - unified 2560 - unified 640 - unified Speichertyp LPDDR5-6400 GDDR6 GDDR6 Shared Memory nein nein nein Stromverbrauch 53 Watt 110 Watt 40 Watt Herstellungsprozess 5 nm 12 nm 12 nm Notebookgröße mittel (15.4" z.B.) groß (17" z.B.) Erscheinungsdatum 17.01.2023 27.05.2019 12.04.2021 Codename N19E-Q3 Architektur Turing Turing Kerntakt 1110 - 1560 (Boost) MHz 735 - 1335 (Boost) MHz Speichertakt 14000 MHz 10000 effective = 1250 MHz Speicherbandbreite 256 Bit 128 Bit Max. Speichergröße 8 GB 4 GB API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.6, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3 Transistors 10.8 Billion 4.7 Billion Features DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor TMUs 40 ROPs 32 Memory Bandwidth 160 GB/s Die Size 200 mm² PCIe 3.0 x16 Displays 4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
CPU in M2 Max 38-Core GPU GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo Apple M2 Max 12 x 2424 MHz, 79 W ? MHz ? MHz
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T600
2.9 pt (9%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 6823 avg: 7362 median: 7362 (21%) max: 7901 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 86% 100%
2496 Points (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 59% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 6851 avg: 7284 median: 7284 (19%) max: 7717 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 89% 100%
2195 Points (6%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 59% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
445161 Points (45%)
304731 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
152912 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
38830 Points (37%)
31922 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
119052 Points (29%)
40917 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 15912 avg: 16903 median: 16903 (28%) max: 17894 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 89% 100%
6284 Points (11%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 62% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 17619 avg: 18849 median: 18849 (21%) max: 20079 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 88% 100%
6552 Points (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 60% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
182459 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
25103 Points (29%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 19880 avg: 21595 median: 21595 (28%) max: 23310 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 85% 100%
9497 Points (12%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 63% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 23739 avg: 25371 median: 25370.5 (22%) max: 27002 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 88% 100%
8694 Points (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 60% 100%
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
56250 Points (16%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T600 344838 Points (100%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
62557 Points (34%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T600
30400 Points (17%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
46380 Points (51%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T600
43997 Points (57%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
89.9 fps (27%)
32.7 fps (10%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
51.2 Seconds (5%)
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
149.1 fps (37%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA T600
115 fps (29%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
186 fps (27%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA T600
68.6 fps (10%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
98 fps (21%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA T600
35.3 fps (8%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
62.4 fps (16%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA T600
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
144.1 fps (39%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA T600
67.4 fps (18%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
13.9 fps (12%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA T600
5 fps (4%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
140.7 fps (56%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA T600
78.5 fps (31%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
161.9 fps (27%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA T600
76.9 fps (13%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
80 fps (14%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 125.4 avg: 152.2 median: 152.2 (41%) max: 178.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 70% 100%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T600
114 fps (31%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 67% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 271.1 avg: 314.1 median: 314.1 (35%) max: 357.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 76% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T600
122 fps (14%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 55% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 94 avg: 97.2 median: 97.2 (21%) max: 100.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 94% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T600
34.9 fps (8%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 64% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 73.2 avg: 87.9 median: 87.9 (18%) max: 102.5 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 71% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T600
35.7 fps (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 53% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 207.9 avg: 247 median: 247 (28%) max: 286.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 73% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T600
99.8 fps (11%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 54% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 36.03 avg: 40.5 median: 40.5 (13%) max: 45.02 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 80% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T600
12.6 fps (4%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 54% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 208 avg: 239 median: 239 (35%) max: 269.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 77% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T600
98 fps (14%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 57% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 212.6 avg: 245 median: 245 (27%) max: 277.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 77% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 173 avg: 178.7 median: 178.7 (31%) max: 184.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 94% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T600
79.9 fps (14%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 69% 100%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
16.9 fps (5%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
75.6 fps (8%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
4.5 fps (4%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
46.1 fps (8%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
32.3 fps (15%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
13.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T600 SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
19.4 fps (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6824 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T600
6830 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
127.6 fps (42%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
104.1 fps (34%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
147.5 fps (9%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 197 avg: 215.5 median: 215.5 (13%) max: 234 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W TDP 110 W 84% 63% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
227.1 fps (13%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W TDP 110 W 91% 63% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 99.6 avg: 99.8 median: 99.8 (100%) max: 100 %
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
179.9 fps (73%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
397.6 fps (72%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
950 fps (70%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
585 fps (66%)
305.3 fps (34%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W 52% 100%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
1294 fps (27%)
440.5 fps (9%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W 34% 100%
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1708 fps (100%)
490.4 fps (29%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W 29% 100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
3185 fps (25%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
1213 fps (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W 38% 100%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2840 Samples/s (10%)
1121 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
5927 Samples/s (10%)
2049 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
13576 Points (15%)
4825 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
76.7 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
80.7 Watt (11%)
83.5 Watt (12%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W 100% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
92 Watt (20%)
min: 137 avg: 159.5 median: 159.5 (35%) max: 182 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W TDP 110 W 116% 133% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4341 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (43%) max: 0.511 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 110 W 100% 85%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.9 fps per Watt (78%)
0.3 fps per Watt (27%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W 35% 100%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
35.1 dB(A) (56%)
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 39.6 avg: 40.8 median: 40.8 (65%) max: 41.9 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 64 W TDP 110 W 100% 84% 95%
Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU → 100% n=2 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) → 123% n=2 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T600 → 127% n=2
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
283 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
207 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
171 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
121 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
89 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
50 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
72 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
60.2 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
48.6 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
330 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
147 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
96 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
71 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
47 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
98 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
77.5 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
42.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
37.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
22.4 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
180 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
122 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
96 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
70 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
47 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
25 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
267 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
180.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
151 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
85.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
63.3 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
118 124 ~ 121 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
102 104 ~ 103 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
99 103 ~ 101 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
88 94 ~ 91 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
72 82 ~ 77 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
39 46 ~ 43 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
150 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
125 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
93 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
86 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
60 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
33 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
143.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
119.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
105.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
69.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
34.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
116.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
100.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
86.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
81 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
65.5 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
41.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
95.4 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
93.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
85.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
81.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
72.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
39.4 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
99 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
87 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
75 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
54 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
41 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
28 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
182 fps
76%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
138.6 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
131 fps
80%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
105.2 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
122 fps
67%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
81.6 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
109 fps
78%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
85 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
78 fps
73%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
57.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
29.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
241 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
180 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
142 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
95 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
76 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
48 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
129 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
106 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
100 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
96 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
69 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
36 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
119 122 ~ 121 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
107 110 ~ 109 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
88 90.2 ~ 89 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
76.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
139.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
98 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
90.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
52.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
35 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
289 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
148 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
141 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
109 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
45.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
199.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
127.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
104.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
45.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
146 152 ~ 149 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
135 140 ~ 138 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
130 133 ~ 132 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
124 129 ~ 127 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
100 111 ~ 106 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
303 345 ~ 324 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
215 254 ~ 235 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
83 fps
172%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
132 153 ~ 143 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
76 fps
99%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
70 79 ~ 75 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
46 56 ~ 51 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
84 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
81 fps
100%
M2 Max 38-Core GPU:
57 fps
Average Gaming Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) → 92% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 73%
Average Gaming NVIDIA T600 → 101% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 58%
NVIDIA T600 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Far Cry 6 93.5 44.6 21.3 6.33 F1 2021 171.9 78.8 63.7 40.2 29.1 15.7 F1 2020 150.4 73.1 55.5 38.6 27 14.5 Borderlands 3 107.6 42 26.7 19.9 13.4 5.54 Metro Exodus 74.6 34 24 19.4 14.8 8.47 Strange Brigade 174.4 64.9 51.4 44.8 31.9 17.9 Far Cry 5 95 46 42 39 26 12 X-Plane 11.11 132.8 107 95.9 40.8 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 70.7 34.9 25.1 17.8 9.98 Dota 2 Reborn 162.8 148.6 120.7 110.5 39.6 The Witcher 3 139.1 82.8 47.5 27.2 16.1 GTA V 181.5 175.6 80.3 38.2 26.6 25 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 5 7 5 5 2 4 4 3 1 4 5 1 7 1 9 2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 2020 283 207 171 121 89 50 Anno 1800 98 77.5 42.6 37.7 22.4 The Division 2 180 122 96 70 47 25 Dirt Rally 2.0 267 180.7 151 85.6 63.3 Far Cry New Dawn 121 103 101 91 77 43 Just Cause 4 150 125 93 86 60 33 Darksiders III 143.8 119.2 105.2 69.1 34.2 Battlefield V 116.7 100.6 86.6 81 65.5 41.8 Hitman 2 95.4 93.6 85.8 81.1 72.9 39.4 Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 99 87 75 54 41 28 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 138.6 105.2 81.6 85 57.1 29.7 F1 2018 241 180 142 95 76 48 Far Cry 5 129 106 100 96 69 36 X-Plane 11.11 121 109 89 76.6 Ghost Recon Wildlands 139.9 98 90.8 52.9 35 For Honor 289 148 141 109 45.7 Rise of the Tomb Raider 199.6 127.8 104.9 45.1 Dota 2 Reborn 149 138 132 127 106 The Witcher 3 324 235 143 75 51 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 13 9 10 12 7 3 13 2 4 9 4 12 2
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K Borderlands 3 72 60.2 48.6 Total War: Three Kingdoms 330 147 96 71 47 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 182 131 122 109 78 The Witcher 3 83 76 GTA V 84 81 57 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 1
v1.28
log 10. 04:36:30
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11574 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9856 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 11373 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731209790s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11574 +0.012s ... 0.016s
#10 got single benchmarks 11574 +0s ... 0.016s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9856 +0s ... 0.017s
#12 got single benchmarks 9856 +0.001s ... 0.017s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11373 +0.004s ... 0.021s
#14 got single benchmarks 11373 +0.005s ... 0.026s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.064s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.064s
#18 Got 223 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.075s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.075s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.077s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.085s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.085s
#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.085s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)