Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 8-Core GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA T1000

Apple M2 8-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 8-Core GPU

Die Apple M2 8-Kern-GPU ist eine selbst designte Grafikkarte im Apple M2 SoC und laut Apple mit acht der zehn Kerne. Die 8-Kern-Variante bietet wahrscheinlich 128 Ausführungseinheiten und eine theoretische Maximalleistung von 2,9 Teraflops (geschätzt). Damit ist sie um 0,3 Teraflop schneller als die alte 8-Kern-GPU im Apple M1 und soll auch größere Caches bieten. Im Vergleich zur 10-Kern-GPU ist die Taktung mit maximal 1398 MHz identisch, wodurch die stärkere Grafik etwa 25% schneller sein sollte.

Die M2-GPU unterstützt Apple's Metal 2 Schnittstelle und dürfte eine ähnliche Architektur wie die älteren PowerVR Grafikeinheiten (z.B. im Apple A10) aufweisen.

Da der SoC im (second generation) 5nm Prozess bei TSMC hergestellt wird (wahrscheinlich N5P), sollte die Energieeffizienz sehr sein. Nach unseren Messungen ist der Stromverbrauch der GPU alleine (laut internen Tools) bei etwa 10 Watt.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison

Die Nvidia Quadro T2000 für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und mobile Workstations der Mittelklasse. Sie basiert auf den selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) mit 1024 Shadern und vergleichbaren Taktraten. Weiters stehen 64 Texture Mapping Units und 32 ROPs zur Verfügung. Die bis zu 4 GB GDDR5 Grafikspeicher werden mit 2000 MHz getaktet und per 128 Bit Grafikbus angebunden. Bei den maximalen 60 Watt TGP taktet die GPU mit 1575 (Base) bis 1785 MHz (Boost).

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.

Apple M2 8-Core GPUNVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)NVIDIA T1000
Quadro Turing Serie
M2 Max 38-Core GPU 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU 16
M2 10-Core GPU 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU 8 @ 1.4 GHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000
T1200 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Pipelines8 - unified1024 - unified
Kerntakt1398 (Boost) MHz1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz
SpeichertypLPDDR5-6400GDDR5
Shared Memoryneinneinnein
Stromverbrauch10 Watt60 Watt
Herstellungsprozess5 nm12 nm
Erscheinungsdatum06.06.2022 27.05.2019
PredecessorM1 8-Core GPU
CodenameN19P-Q3
ArchitekturTuring
Speichertakt8000 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit
Max. Speichergröße4 GB
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Transistors4.7 Billion
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T1000
3.7 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1 T1000 +
3534 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
3088 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
398761 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
179865 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 T1000 +
37881 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
50553 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1 T1000 +
8124 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
8450 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
237130 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
21009 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
5689 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
100%
1 T1000 +
34584 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
100%
1 T1000 +
41157 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13150     avg: 13271     median: 13271 (18%)     max: 13392 Points
98%
1 T1000 +
12953 Points (18%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13370     avg: 13524     median: 13523.5 (12%)     max: 13677 Points
87%
1 T1000 +
11793 Points (10%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 T1000 +
46318 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 T1000 +
39668 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T1000 +
78565 Points (86%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark 06
100%
1 T1000 +
58968 Points (77%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
100%
1 T1000 +
42.2 fps (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (59%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
106 fps (26%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
91.1 fps (13%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
43.9 fps (10%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
47.2 fps (13%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
101 fps (40%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
101 fps (17%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
111 fps (19%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
111 fps (30%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
167 fps (19%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
42.7 fps (9%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
125 fps (14%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
120 fps (18%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
164 fps (18%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
111 fps (19%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
39.3 fps (28%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
18.1 fps (12%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
78.1 fps (38%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
37.3 fps (23%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
44 fps (14%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
13.4 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
62.8 fps (10%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
9.5 fps (2%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
43.3 fps (21%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
21.9 fps (14%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
27.4 fps (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 T1000 +
6837 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
252.5 fps (83%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 8-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
128.6 fps (8%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
203 fps (12%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
335.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 8-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
100%
1 T1000 +
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
39.8 fps (16%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
91 fps (17%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
247 fps (18%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
199.9 fps (23%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
306.9 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
483.7 fps (28%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 8-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
839 fps (7%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
100%
1 T1000 +
386 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
100%
1 T1000 +
31.9 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
100%
1 T1000 +
38611 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
100%
1 T1000 +
36031 Points (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
1987 Samples/s (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
4129 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 T1000 +
6369 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
101.9 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
27.4 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
156.8 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
100%
1 T1000 +
min: 0.07462     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (18%)     max: 0.4205 fps per Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 8-Core GPU → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → 158% n=1

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T1000 → 261% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
T1000:
98.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
82.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
22  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
19  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
10  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
138.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
90.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
50.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
39.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
44  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
38  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
34.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
28.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
23.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
35.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
30.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
29.5  fps
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
T1000:
108.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
96.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
63.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
69.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
55.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
35.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
27.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
125.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
91.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
49.7  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
51.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
42.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
21.4  fps
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
T1000:
110.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
56.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
47.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
40.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
43  fps
351%
T1000:
151  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
29.7  fps
202%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
16.6  fps
230%
T1000:
38.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
13.4  fps
213%
T1000:
28.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
77  fps
254%
T1000:
195.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
39  fps
154%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
18  fps
207%
T1000:
37.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
14  fps
172%
T1000:
24.1  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
117  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
102.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
26.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
62  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
28  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
24  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M2 8-Core GPU:
20  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
226  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
87.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
59.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
127  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
211  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
145.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
130.1  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
101.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
49.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
36.2  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
246.2  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
217.7  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
150.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
136.5  fps
low 1024x768
T1000:
188.8  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
113.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
63.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
35.2  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T1000:
187.4  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
187.1  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
103.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
50.2  fps

Average Gaming Apple M2 8-Core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA T1000 → 223%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 198%

NVIDIA T1000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2498.482.658.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22191510
Total War Pharaoh138.690.850.639.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage444038
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty45.134.228.323.8
Baldur's Gate 34535.230.229.5
F1 23108.396.563.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands69.255.635.327.6
GRID Legends125.491.369.649.7
God of War51.842.533.521.4
Far Cry 6110.456.947.440.3
Borderlands 31516038.228.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms195.96037.324.1
Far Cry New Dawn117625853
Metro Exodus102.345.93326.1
Strange Brigade22687.269.459.9
Far Cry 5127625753
X-Plane 11.11211145.8130.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark101.349.336.2
Dota 2 Reborn246.2217.7150.4136.5
The Witcher 3188.8113.863.935.2
GTA V187.4187.1103.550.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
7
10
1
8
10
3
2
13
5
2
8
8

1






Apple M2 8-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Borderlands 34329.716.613.4
Total War: Three Kingdoms77391814
Shadow of the Tomb Raider62282420
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
2
1

3


3








Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.28
log 19. 19:13:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11375 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9858 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12782 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726766001s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.027s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11375 +0.026s ... 0.054s

#10 got single benchmarks 11375 +0.003s ... 0.057s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9858 +0s ... 0.057s

#12 got single benchmarks 9858 +0.004s ... 0.061s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.005s ... 0.067s

#14 got single benchmarks 12782 +0.004s ... 0.07s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.1s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.1s

#18 Got 107 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.105s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.105s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.106s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.113s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.113s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.113s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)