Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T7800

► remove from comparison Intel T7800

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Extreme X7800 jedoch mit geringerem TDP und ohne offenem Multiplikator. Der T7800 basiert noch auf den Merom Kern mit 4 MB Level 2 Cache welcher später vom schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst wurde (mit max 6 MB Level 2 Cache).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo L7100Intel Core 2 Duo T7800Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 « 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1200 MHz2600 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt34 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478
$515 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Voltage1.075V-1.175V V
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1290 Points (8%)
2663 Points (16%)
min: 1875     avg: 2092     median: 2088.5 (13%)     max: 2316 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2294 Points (2%)
5014 Points (4%)
min: 3480     avg: 3854.5     median: 3809.5 (3%)     max: 4319 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1355     avg: 1915.5     median: 1915.5 (91%)     max: 2103.1 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 42.47     avg: 60     median: 60 (95%)     max: 63.4 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
995 Points (2%)
2258 Points (5%)
min: 1560     avg: 1606     median: 1628 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 41     avg: 41     median: 41 (124%)     max: 33.155 s
19 s (57%)
min: 26.78     avg: 27.4     median: 27 (81%)     max: 28.27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 90     avg: 90     median: 90 (115%)     max: 78 s
47 s (60%)
min: 61.8     avg: 63.9     median: 63.9 (82%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2181     avg: 2181     median: 2181 (113%)     max: 1931 s
1203 s (62%)
1492 s (77%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
10503 MIPS (5%)
23563 MIPS (11%)
16620 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
7645 MFLOPS (6%)
16641 MFLOPS (13%)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3871 Points (8%)
6634 Points (14%)
min: 3903     avg: 3925.5     median: 3925.5 (8%)     max: 3948 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
4.9 Points (63%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4393 Points (3%)
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2476>2103.1 for benchmark 50, setting:204 +0s ... 0.018s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 77.6>63.4 for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.02s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 41>33.155 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.023s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 90>78 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.027s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2181>1931 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.03s

log 22. 05:17:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 386 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732249056s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:17:24 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 386 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 386 +0s ... 0.003s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#11 got single benchmarks 339 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#13 got single benchmarks 442 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.011s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.013s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.014s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.015s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.016s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.017s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.018s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.02s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.021s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.022s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.022s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.023s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.025s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.026s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.027s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.027s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.029s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.03s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.031s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.032s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.032s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.033s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.034s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.034s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.035s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.036s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.036s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.037s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.038s

#46 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.038s

#47 return log +0s ... 0.038s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)