Notebookcheck Logo

Huawei Kirin A1 vs Rockchip RK3288 vs HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

Huawei Kirin A1

► remove from comparison

Rockchip RK3288

► remove from comparison RK3288

Der Rockchip RK3288 ist ein Mittelklasse ARM-SoC für Android und Chrome OS basierte Systeme. Er integriert vier 32 Bit ARM Cortex-A12 Kerne (welche jedoch von ARM Cortex-A17 genannt werden, durch die vergleichbare Performance). Die CPU Kerne takten mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Weiters integriert der SoC (System on a CHip) eine ARM Mali-T760 MP4 (auch Mali-T764 genannte) Grafikkarte mit 600 MHz Taktfrequenz und einen Dual-Channel DDR3, DDR3L, LPDDR2, LPDDR3 Speicherkontroller.

Die ARM Cortex-A12 Kerne (ARMv7-A Architektur) sind die direkten Nachfolger der Cortex-A9 Cores und dank eines komplexeren Out-of-Order-Designs erreichen sie eine höhere Rechenleistung/MHz (3 statt 2,5 DMIPS/MHz). 

Die integrierte Video Engine unterstützt das Encoding von 1080p Videos in H.264, VP8 und MVC. Dekodieren kann der Chip 4K H.264 und 10 Bit H.265 Videos.

Der Rockchip 3288 wird im aktuellen 28 nm HKMG Prozess gefertigt.

HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

► remove from comparison

Coretex A9 Quad-Core - max 1.5 GHz, im Huawei Mediapad 10 FHD mit 1.2 GHz

show full text
ModelHuawei Kirin A1Rockchip RK3288HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620
SeriesHuawei
CodenameARM Cortex-M7
Clock200 MHz1800 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 14 / 44 / 4
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Technology28 nm40 nm
FeaturesARM MAli-T624 at 600 MHz, dedicated 2D processor, 1080P H.264, VP8, MVC encoding, 4K H.264 and 10 Bits H.265 decoding, 1080p multi video decode, Dual-channel DDR3(L) memory controller, HDMI 2.0ARMv7
iGPUARM Mali-T760 MP4 (600 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.rk3288.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 3209     avg: 4477     median: 4894 (4%)     max: 5167 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 5354     avg: 5357     median: 5357 (4%)     max: 5360 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3288 +
15496 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 1909     avg: 2183     median: 2182.5 (4%)     max: 2456 Points
1094 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 698     avg: 779     median: 778.5 (15%)     max: 859 Points
327 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 439     avg: 489.9     median: 500 (4%)     max: 547 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 940     avg: 1187     median: 1218 (11%)     max: 1290 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1793     avg: 2360     median: 2351 (5%)     max: 2731 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1000     avg: 1317     median: 1275 (3%)     max: 1591 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1209     avg: 1573     median: 1557 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 92.3     avg: 133.3     median: 138.1 (5%)     max: 151.8 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 37.8     avg: 44.2     median: 46.6 (5%)     max: 48.71 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 4753     avg: 5809     median: 5790 (7%)     max: 6884 ms
26477 ms (31%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 745     avg: 746     median: 745.5 (8%)     max: 746 ms
min: 856     avg: 2197     median: 1610 (18%)     max: 4026 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1522     avg: 1643     median: 1540 (15%)     max: 2080 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 5967     avg: 6798     median: 7107 (6%)     max: 7319 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4404     avg: 4736     median: 4736 (11%)     max: 5068 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4820     avg: 5667     median: 5662 (37%)     max: 6713 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
14434 Points (34%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
47100 Points (16%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 92     avg: 191     median: 191 (6%)     max: 290 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 8740     avg: 8897     median: 8897 (29%)     max: 9054 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 8223     avg: 8737     median: 8678 (1%)     max: 9118 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
3888 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3288 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 09. 03:22:21

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12639 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6984 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3613 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731118941s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.053s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12639 +0.001s ... 0.054s

#9 got single benchmarks 12639 +0.004s ... 0.058s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6984 +0.001s ... 0.058s

#11 got single benchmarks 6984 +0.005s ... 0.063s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3613 +0.001s ... 0.063s

#13 got single benchmarks 3613 +0.006s ... 0.069s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.081s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.081s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)