Huawei Kirin A1 vs Loongson 2F 900MHz vs UNISOC Tiger T310

Huawei Kirin A1

► remove from comparison

Loongson 2F 900MHz

► remove from comparison

UNISOC Tiger T310

► remove from comparison

Der Unisoc Tiger T310 ist ein Prozessor der Einstiegsklasse mit einem schnellen ARM Cortex-A75-Kern und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate. Die zusätzlichen 3 Cortex-A55-Stromsparkerne takten mit bis zu 1,8 GHz.

Das SoC integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und unterstützt maximal zwei Kameras mit 16 und 8 Megapixel, sowie die Full-HD-Videoaufzeichnung mit maximal 30 fps.

Der Speicherkontroller kann mit LPDDR4x zusammenarbeiten, liefert dabei allerdings maximal eine Taktrate von 1333 MHz. Als Massenspeicher wird eMMC 5.1 unterstützt.

Die integrierte PowerVR GE8300 Grafikkarte bietet eine Taktrate von maximal 800 MHz und steuert den Bildschirm mit bis zu 1.600 x 720 Pixel Auflösung an.

Das SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt.

Model

Huawei Kirin A1

Loongson 2F 900MHz

UNISOC Tiger T310

Series

Huawei

UNISOC

Codename

ARM Cortex-M7

Clock

200 MHz

900 MHz

1800 - 2000 MHz

Cores / Threads

1 / 1

1 / 1

4 / 4

Architecture

ARM

MIPS

ARM

Announced

Serie:

Google Tensor G4	1.95 GHz	8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W	1.53 - 2.49 GHz	12 / 12
Samsung Exynos W1000	1.5 GHz	5 / 5
UNISOC Tiger T310	1.8 - 2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288	1.8 GHz	4 / 4
Apple S5		2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620	1.2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168	1.2 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz	1 GHz	1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz «	0.9 GHz	1 / 1
CSR8670	0.08 GHz	2
ARM Cortex-M4
HiSilicon Hi6262
DK3.5+ST		2
unknown

Google Tensor G4	1.95 GHz	8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W	1.53 - 2.49 GHz	12 / 12
Samsung Exynos W1000	1.5 GHz	5 / 5
UNISOC Tiger T310 «	1.8 - 2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288	1.8 GHz	4 / 4
Apple S5		2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620	1.2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168	1.2 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz	1 GHz	1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz	0.9 GHz	1 / 1
CSR8670	0.08 GHz	2
ARM Cortex-M4
HiSilicon Hi6262
DK3.5+ST		2
unknown

L2 Cache

512 KB

TDP

4 Watt

Technology

12 nm

Features

LTE Cat.7, BT 5.0, WiFi ac, GNSS, eMMC 5.1, LPDDR3 933, LPDDR4x 1333 MHz

iGPU

PowerVR GE8300 ( - 800 MHz)

Manufacturer

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics

100%

1588 Points (19%)

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics

100%

1590 Points (18%)

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

376 Points (15%)

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

756 Points (1%)

Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

1687 Points (17%)

Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

2969 Points (3%)

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

2987 Points (5%)

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

1656 Points (25%)

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *

100%

3239 ms (4%)

Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score

100%

11986 Points (10%)

WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score

100%

45 Points (13%)

WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score

100%

63 Points (13%)

Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score

100%

162595 Points (10%)

Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU

100%

57138 Points (16%)

PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests

100%

1653 Points (0%)

PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score

100%

9900 Points (16%)

PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0

100%

6866 Points (29%)

Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *

100%

3.7 Watt (2%)

Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *

100%

1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tiger T310 → 0% ⁿ⁼⁰

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte

- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
¹ This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28

log 09. 03:03:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12639 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 480 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14530 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731117824s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12639 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#9 got single benchmarks 12639 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 480 +0.001s ... 0.034s

#11 got single benchmarks 480 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14530 +0.001s ... 0.037s

#13 got single benchmarks 14530 +0.003s ... 0.04s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.048s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.048s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!

> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head

Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)