Huawei Kirin A1 vs HiSilicon Hi6262 vs Loongson 2F 900MHz

Huawei Kirin A1

► remove from comparison

HiSilicon Hi6262

► remove from comparison

Loongson 2F 900MHz

► remove from comparison

show full text

Model

Huawei Kirin A1

HiSilicon Hi6262

Loongson 2F 900MHz

Series

Huawei

HiSilicon

Codename

ARM Cortex-M7

Clock

200 MHz

900 MHz

Cores / Threads

1 / 1

Architecture

ARM

MIPS

Announced

Serie:

Google Tensor G4	1.95 GHz	8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W	1.53 - 2.49 GHz	12 / 12
Samsung Exynos W1000	1.5 GHz	5 / 5
UNISOC Tiger T310	1.8 - 2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288	1.8 GHz	4 / 4
Apple S5		2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620	1.2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168	1.2 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz	1 GHz	1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz	0.9 GHz	1 / 1
CSR8670	0.08 GHz	2
ARM Cortex-M4
HiSilicon Hi6262 «
DK3.5+ST		2
unknown

Google Tensor G4	1.95 GHz	8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W	1.53 - 2.49 GHz	12 / 12
Samsung Exynos W1000	1.5 GHz	5 / 5
UNISOC Tiger T310	1.8 - 2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288	1.8 GHz	4 / 4
Apple S5		2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620	1.2 GHz	4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX	1.5 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168	1.2 GHz	2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz	1.2 GHz	1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz	1 GHz	1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz «	0.9 GHz	1 / 1
CSR8670	0.08 GHz	2
ARM Cortex-M4
HiSilicon Hi6262
DK3.5+ST		2
unknown

L2 Cache

512 KB

TDP

4 Watt

Benchmarks

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte

- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
¹ This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28

log 09. 03:37:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12639 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13241 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 480 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731119832s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12639 +0s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 12639 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13241 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#11 got single benchmarks 13241 +0.003s ... 0.006s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 480 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#13 got single benchmarks 480 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.01s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.01s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!

> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head

Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)