Notebookcheck Logo

Huawei Kirin A1 vs HiSilicon Hi6262 vs DK3.5+ST

Huawei Kirin A1

► remove from comparison

HiSilicon Hi6262

► remove from comparison

DK3.5+ST

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelHuawei Kirin A1HiSilicon Hi6262DK3.5+ST
SeriesHuawei HiSilicon Huawei
CodenameARM Cortex-M7
Clock200 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 12
ArchitectureARM
Announced
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 «  cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST « 2 cores
unknown cores

Benchmarks

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 09. 03:34:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12639 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13241 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12765 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731119671s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12639 +0s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 12639 +0s ... 0.002s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13241 +0s ... 0.002s

#11 got single benchmarks 13241 +0.003s ... 0.005s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#13 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.009s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.009s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.009s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)