Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

HiSilicon Kirin 710A

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 710A

Der HiSilicon Kirin 710A von Huawei ist ein ARM-Basierter Octa-Core-SoC der Mittelklasse, der im Sommer 2020 vorgestellt wurde. Er basiert auf den Kirin 710, jedoch wird er bei SMIC in China in 14nm FinFET (statt 12nm bei TSMC) gefertigt. Wie der Kirin 960 und 970 integriert er vier ARM Cortex-A73 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 2 GHz und vier Cortex-A53 Kerne mit bis zu 1,7 GHz (wahrscheinlich) im big.LITTLE Verbund. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist jedoch deutlich schwächer und nur eine ARM Mali-G51 MP4. Der integrierte LPDDR4 Dual-Channel Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal 6 GB. Weiters integriert der Kirin 710A auch ein LTE-Modem mit 600 Mbps Download und 150 Mbps Upload, 802.11 a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz WLAN, 1080p H.264 En- und Dekodierung, Bluetooth 4.2 und GPS / Glonass / Beidou.

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison  Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 710AMediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
SeriesHiSilicon Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz2300 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Transistors5500 Million
Technology14 nm16 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.7 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 600 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 150 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 4.2, WiFi a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X
iGPUARM Mali-G51 MP4PowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 710A
0.5 pt (36%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12601     avg: 12741     median: 12740.5 (11%)     max: 12880 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2365     avg: 2444     median: 2455 (29%)     max: 2501 Points
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2441     avg: 2464     median: 2441 (28%)     max: 2511 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
323 Points (9%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
1172 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 296     avg: 299     median: 298 (12%)     max: 304 Points
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1256     avg: 1315     median: 1322 (2%)     max: 1359 Points
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1422     avg: 1440     median: 1440 (14%)     max: 1458 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5211     avg: 5232     median: 5231.5 (5%)     max: 5252 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3221 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3498 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10491 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4894 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6201 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3675.3     avg: 4069     median: 4122 (5%)     max: 4411 ms
12972 ms (15%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8911     avg: 9642     median: 9996 (9%)     max: 10018 Points
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
39 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
55 Points (11%)
35 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
37557 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
35829 Points (29%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
26575 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
69743 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
169704 Points (16%)
105754 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
182567 Points (11%)
117837 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
62687 Points (17%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
63.8 MB/s (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
114.3 MB/s (3%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
34.5 MB/s (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
460 MB/s (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 7061     avg: 11985     median: 11985 (19%)     max: 16909 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 6622     avg: 6862     median: 6862 (28%)     max: 7102 Points
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (21%)     max: 5221 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3345 Points (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
6401 Points (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6287     avg: 7038     median: 7038 (46%)     max: 7789 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7991     avg: 8101     median: 8101 (41%)     max: 8211 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
337 Points (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.65     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (2%)     max: 6.81 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.846     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (3%)     max: 2.97 Watt

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710A → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 46% n=19

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 08:22:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12945 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730445722s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Nov 2024 05:17:03 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.032s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12945 +0.004s ... 0.036s

#8 got single benchmarks 12945 +0.007s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.003s ... 0.046s

#10 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.005s ... 0.051s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.017s ... 0.068s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.069s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.07s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.084s

#17 return log +0.003s ... 0.086s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)