Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Mediatek MT8735

HiSilicon Kirin 710

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 710

Der HiSilicon Kirin 710 von Huawei ist ein ARM-Basierter Octa-Core-SoC der Mittelklasse, der im Sommer 2018 vorgestellt wurde. Wie der Kirin 960 und 970 integriert er vier ARM Cortex-A73 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 2,2 GHz und vier Cortex-A53 Kerne mit bis zu 1,7 GHz im big.LITTLE Verbund. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist jedoch deutlich schwächer und nur eine ARM Mali-G51 MP4. Der Kirin 710 wird im modernen 12nm Verfahren bei TSMC gefertig (im Vergleich zum 16nm Prozess des Kirin 960). Der integrierte LPDDR4 Dual-Channel Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal 6 GB. Weiters integriert der Kirin 710 auch ein LTE-Modem mit 600 Mbps Download und 150 Mbps Upload, 802.11 a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz WLAN, 1080p H.264 En- und Dekodierung, Bluetooth 4.2 und GPS / Glonass / Beidou.

Der Kirin 710F bietet die selben Spezifikationen, wird jedoch in einem anderen Package geliefert (FCCSP - Flip Chip Chip Scale Package). Die Leistung sollte jedoch vergleichbar sein (siehe Huawei P Smart Z Benchmarks).

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison MT8735

Der Mediatek MT8735 ist ein 2015 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Mittelklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er wird in 28 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,3 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine ARM Mali-T720MP2 zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem inkl. CDMA2000 und 5GHz Dual-Band 802.11bgn WiFi. 

Die Leistung liegt im Bereich der älteren MT6735 (jedoch mit bis zu 1.5 GHz getaktet) SoCs im Einstiegsbereich.

show full text
ModelHiSilicon Kirin 710Mediatek MT8735
SeriesHiSilicon Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2200 MHz1300 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Transistors5500 Million
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.7 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 600 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 150 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 4.2, WiFi a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G51 MP4ARM Mali-T720
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 710
0.5 pt (37%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -3%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -3%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -2%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 -1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 -1%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 -1%
UNISOC T618
0.475 -1%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 8%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 11%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
0.552 15%
Mediatek Helio G90T
0.571 19%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 171%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 11158     avg: 16572     median: 17232.5 (14%)     max: 22668 Points
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (9%)     max: 11114 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1851     avg: 2350     median: 2478 (29%)     max: 2789 Points
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (10%)     max: 864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1656     avg: 2358     median: 2459 (28%)     max: 2723 Points
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (10%)     max: 931 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 330     avg: 330.5     median: 330.5 (13%)     max: 331 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1320     avg: 1338     median: 1338 (2%)     max: 1356 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 319     avg: 327     median: 327 (1%)     max: 335 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1266     avg: 1339     median: 1339 (4%)     max: 1412 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1523     avg: 1560     median: 1550 (15%)     max: 1614 Points
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (6%)     max: 647 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5266     avg: 5454     median: 5430 (5%)     max: 5615 Points
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1612     avg: 1623     median: 1623 (22%)     max: 1634 Points
597 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5377     avg: 5447     median: 5447 (13%)     max: 5517 Points
1651 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5456 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1517 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1356     avg: 1702     median: 1701.5 (14%)     max: 2047 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 2488     avg: 3017     median: 3017 (27%)     max: 3546 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 9096     avg: 9764     median: 9763.5 (19%)     max: 10431 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 4429     avg: 4767     median: 4766.5 (10%)     max: 5104 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 5366     avg: 5857     median: 5856.5 (15%)     max: 6347 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3999     avg: 4223     median: 4205 (5%)     max: 4853 ms
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199 (15%)     max: 13705 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9041     avg: 9659     median: 9695 (8%)     max: 10544 Points
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 52     avg: 61.7     median: 62 (13%)     max: 69 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 104012     avg: 108955     median: 110126 (38%)     max: 112870 Points
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 9898     avg: 13356     median: 11364.5 (35%)     max: 32585 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 34146     avg: 38196     median: 36606 (45%)     max: 54562 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 22245     avg: 25701     median: 27005.5 (8%)     max: 28462 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 54673     avg: 61958     median: 60404 (37%)     max: 73966 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 124870     avg: 139210     median: 135942 (24%)     max: 183420 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 55985     avg: 58317     median: 58317 (49%)     max: 60649 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 35479     avg: 36250     median: 36250 (29%)     max: 37021 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 28697     avg: 28859     median: 28858.5 (5%)     max: 29020 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 60900     avg: 66675     median: 66674.5 (24%)     max: 72449 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 185725     avg: 190100     median: 190100 (18%)     max: 194475 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 181152     avg: 184162     median: 184162 (24%)     max: 187172 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3783     avg: 4945     median: 5171.5 (27%)     max: 5286 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 10592     avg: 11047     median: 11046.5 (24%)     max: 11501 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5803     avg: 6497     median: 6685 (44%)     max: 7141 Points
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7004     avg: 8380     median: 8525 (43%)     max: 9854 Points
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 26% n=17

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 04:34:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10172 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730432069s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 05:16:23 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10172 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#8 got single benchmarks 10172 +0.013s ... 0.046s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.001s ... 0.047s

#10 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.005s ... 0.052s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.061s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.067s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.069s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.07s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.075s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.078s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)