Notebookcheck Logo

Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G vs unknown

Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G

 KX-6000G

Der Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G ist ein in China produzierte x86 kompatibler Quad-Core Prozessor mit 15 Watt TDP basierend auf die Architektur von Centaur / VIA. Er integriert vier Kerne die von 2 - 3,3 GHz takten. Die CPU nutzt die Luijiazui Architektur laut Wikipedia und wir in China in 16nm produziert. Die integrierte Genfly GT-10C0 Grafikkarte unterstützt anscheinend DX12, OpenCL 1.2 und OpenGL 4.6.

Mehr Details sind derzeit nicht bekannt, nur das er ev. in einem Lenovo Kaitian X1 eingesetzt wird und in Geekbench Benchmarks selbst von einem Intel N50 knapp geschlagen wird (Multi-Threaded).

ModelZhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000Gunknown
Clock2000 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
TDP15 Watt
Technology16 nm
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
380 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
1012 Points (4%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
min: 14670     avg: 14812     median: 14811.5 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 2740     median: 2753 (2%)     max: 2794 Points

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 09:58:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18564 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732179492s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18564 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 18564 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.106s ... 0.113s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.113s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.115s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.115s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.117s

#15 return log +0.002s ... 0.119s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)