Notebookcheck Logo

Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G vs Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G

 KX-6000G

Der Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G ist ein in China produzierte x86 kompatibler Quad-Core Prozessor mit 15 Watt TDP basierend auf die Architektur von Centaur / VIA. Er integriert vier Kerne die von 2 - 3,3 GHz takten. Die CPU nutzt die Luijiazui Architektur laut Wikipedia und wir in China in 16nm produziert. Die integrierte Genfly GT-10C0 Grafikkarte unterstützt anscheinend DX12, OpenCL 1.2 und OpenGL 4.6.

Mehr Details sind derzeit nicht bekannt, nur das er ev. in einem Lenovo Kaitian X1 eingesetzt wird und in Geekbench Benchmarks selbst von einem Intel N50 knapp geschlagen wird (Multi-Threaded).

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison
ModelZhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000GRockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz
Clock2000 - 3300 MHz1200 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 41 / 1
TDP15 Watt
Technology16 nm55 nm
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
FeaturesVivante GC800, DDR1-3 memory controller, hardware video en- and decoder
iGPUVivante GC800

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
380 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
1012 Points (4%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
14.3 MFLOPS (1%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1249 points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 10:15:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18564 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3317 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732180537s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18564 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 18564 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3317 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 3317 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.01s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.011s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.012s

#15 return log +0.003s ... 0.014s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)