Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Hi6262 vs Intel Core i3-9100F

HiSilicon Hi6262

► remove from comparison

Intel Core i3-9100F

Intel i3-9100F

Der Intel Core i3-9100F ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit vier Kernen auf Basis der Coffee Lake-Architektur, die im Oktober 2018 zusammen mit dem Flaggschiff Intel Core i9-9900K vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor taktet mit 3,6-4,2 GHz und kann insgesamt bis zu 4 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten. Gefertigt wird der Inter Core i3-9100F im verbesserten 14-nm-Prozess (14nm++).

Performance

Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i3-8100 konnte die Leistung etwas gesteigert werden. Leistungszuwächse um 10 bis 15 Prozent können erwartet werden. Beide Prozessoren (alt und neu) bieten weiterhin kein Hyperthreading. Das Leistungsplus summiert sich somit auf kleine Architekturverbesserungen und einem etwas höheren Basis- und Turbotakt. Für den Büroalltag eignet sich diese CPU, welche aufgrund der geringen Abwärme auch keine großen Kühler benötigt.

Grafikeinheit

Beim Intel Core i3-9100F handelt es sich um einen Prozessor ohne integrierte Grafikeinheit. Wer auf eine iGPU Wert legt sollte sich den Intel Core i3-9100 genauer anschauen. Dieser bietet als iGPU eine Intel UHD Graphics 630.

Leistungsaufnahme

Intel beziffert die Thermal Design Power (TDP) auf 65 Watt. Somit Bedarf es keiner großen Kühlsysteme, was auch den Einbau in sehr kompakten Gehäusen ermöglicht.

show full text
ModelHiSilicon Hi6262Intel Core i3-9100F
SeriesHiSilicon Intel Coffee Lake
Serie: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-R
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 «  cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Intel Core i9-9900KS compare4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900K compare3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700K compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9700 compare3 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9600K compare3.7 - 4.6 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9900T compare2.1 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400F compare2.9 - 4.1 GHz6 / 6 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-9100F « 3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
CodenameCoffee Lake-R
Clock3600 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
TDP65 Watt
Technology14 nm
Die Size126 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1151-2
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, Virtualization
Architecturex86
$122 U.S.
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-9100F
27.9 pt (46%)
Intel Core i3-9100F
27.9
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 115%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
414 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1175 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
634 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
171 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.4 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (46%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6509 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
18118 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21908 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8472 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
345.9 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
11.8 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4052 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
17150 MIPS (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4682 MIPS (55%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
44.4 fps (15%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.1 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
687 Seconds (5%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
495.5 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
8742 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
68492 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
68473 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
68727 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6295 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
8958 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4218 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1152 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
4074 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1146 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4060 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5301 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15937 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
866 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
204 Points (37%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
139 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
101.5 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
6.3 Points per Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-9100F → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 11. 03:24:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13241 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12190 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731291861s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13241 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 13241 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12190 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 12190 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.037s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.039s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)