Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960s

Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765

► remove from comparison  Helio P35 MT6765

Der Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 ist ein in Ende 2018 vorgestellter Mittelklasse Octacore für Android basierte Smartphones und Tablets. Er integriert 8 ARM Cortex-A53 Kerne in zwei Clustern. Die vier Kerne im Performance Cluster takten mit bis zu 2,3 GHz, die im Effizienz-Cluster mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Die Die Cores können dank Heterogeneous Multi-Processing bzw. big.LITTLE auch alle gemeinsam genutzt werden. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist eine PowerVR GE8320 welche mit 680 MHz getaktet wird. Der Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3-1688 bzw LPDDR4X-3200 (max. 6 GB). Drahtlose Technologien werden LTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL (Dual SIM) und 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN unterstützt. Der Festspeicher kann mit eMMC 5.1 angeschlossen werden. Die integrierte Videoengine unterstützt Encoding und Wiedergabe von H.264 und die Wiedergabe von H.265/HEVC.

HiSilicon Kirin 960s

► remove from comparison

Der HiSilicon Kirin 960s ist ein ARM-basierter Octa-Core-SoC der Mittelklasse für Smartphones und Tablets. Er wurde mit dem Huawei MediaPad M5 Anfang 2018 eingeführt und bietet zusätzlich zum ähnlichen HiSilicon Kirin 960 eine NPU zur AI-Beschleunigung aus dem Kirin 970. Anscheinend etwas niedriger getaktet als der normale Kirin 960.

Neben den 8 CPU-Kernen (4x Cortex-A73, 4x Cortex-A53) integriert der Chip auch eine moderne Mali-G71 MP8 Grafikeinheit, einen Dual-Channel LPDDR4-Speichercontroller sowie ein LTE Cat. 12/13 Modem. Ende 2016 zählt der Chip zu den schnellsten ARM-SoCs auf dem Markt.

Der Kirin 960 wird in einem modernen 16-Nanometer-Prozess von TSMC gefertigt.

ModelMediatek Helio P35 MT6765HiSilicon Kirin 960s
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A73/-A53
Serie: Cortex-A73/-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 « 1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Clock1800 - 2300 MHz2100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology16 nm16 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320 680MHz, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200ARM Mali-G71 MP8 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.4 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 ( - 680 MHz)ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ( - 900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P35 MT6765
0.3 pt (26%)
14698 Points (12%)
2323 Points (27%)
2101 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 150     avg: 166.7     median: 168.5 (7%)     max: 173 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 539     avg: 886     median: 934.5 (2%)     max: 1022 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 165     avg: 171.3     median: 173 (1%)     max: 176 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 915     avg: 983     median: 1002 (3%)     max: 1031 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 776     avg: 851     median: 855 (9%)     max: 921 Points
1634 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3834     avg: 4013     median: 3973 (4%)     max: 4232 Points
5809 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
790 Points (11%)
1706 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3542 Points (9%)
5609 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3904 Points (6%)
5734 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
841 Points (13%)
1756 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
888 Points (7%)
2165 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2700 Points (24%)
3780 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
6455 Points (13%)
10498 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3586 Points (7%)
5303 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4143 Points (11%)
6502 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9756     avg: 10649     median: 10849 (13%)     max: 11323 ms
5947 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4347     avg: 4747     median: 4643 (4%)     max: 5543 Points
6802 Points (6%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 29     avg: 32     median: 31.5 (7%)     max: 36 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
62996 Points (21%)
147305 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
7343 Points (23%)
8364 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
24869 Points (31%)
28103 Points (34%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
12838 Points (4%)
33870 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
40692 Points (25%)
43350 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
85742 Points (15%)
113687 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 17134     avg: 23682     median: 24259.5 (20%)     max: 29075 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 19601     avg: 26565     median: 26896 (22%)     max: 32868 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 5938     avg: 10313     median: 10175.5 (2%)     max: 14962 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 42692     avg: 45071     median: 45483 (16%)     max: 46624 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 101535     avg: 105631     median: 105734 (10%)     max: 109518 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117053 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
37871 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
603 min (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
5059 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2238     avg: 3957     median: 3956.5 (21%)     max: 5675 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 1780     avg: 4353     median: 4353 (9%)     max: 6926 Points
5114 Points (33%)
5040 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.3 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.1 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 960s → 160% n=24

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 08:20:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11371 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9952 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730445635s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Nov 2024 05:17:03 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11371 +0.005s ... 0.036s

#8 got single benchmarks 11371 +0.016s ... 0.052s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9952 +0.001s ... 0.053s

#10 got single benchmarks 9952 +0.003s ... 0.056s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.023s ... 0.078s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.082s

#14 return log +0.002s ... 0.085s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)