Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T vs UNISOC Tangula T700

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison  Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison UNISOC Tangula T700

Der Unisoc Tangula T700 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1.8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. er bietet ähnliche Spezifikationen wie der Unisoc Tiger T618 bzw T610.

Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Zudem ist die Nutzung von 90-Hz-Bildschirmen möglich. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

ModelMediatek Helio P22T MT8768TUNISOC Tangula T700
Series MediatekUNISOC
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock2300 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology16 nm12 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4XARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
806 Points (9%)
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (14%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
842 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3870 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
12972 ms (15%)
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
10382 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
35 Points (7%)
65 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
186885 Points (18%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (7%)
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
2078 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (12%)
10033 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (21%)     max: 5221 Points
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (36%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4895 Points (32%)
8438 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 199% n=14

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 10. 04:36:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731209760s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#10 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.004s ... 0.046s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.055s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.056s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.056s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.057s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.064s

#17 return log +0.002s ... 0.067s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)