Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T vs UNISOC T616

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison  Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

UNISOC T616

► remove from comparison UNISOC T616

Der Unisoc T616 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate und 6 kleinen Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Dual-Core-ISP (24, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x mit 1866 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

ModelMediatek Helio P22T MT8768TUNISOC T616
Series MediatekUNISOC
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock2300 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology16 nm12 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4XARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP1 (750 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com
L3 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
344%
T616 +
min: 2798     avg: 2956     median: 2990 (35%)     max: 3036 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
806 Points (9%)
372%
T616 +
min: 2798     avg: 2954     median: 3002 (34%)     max: 3063 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
min: 427     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (11%)     max: 440 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
min: 1474     avg: 1556     median: 1572 (6%)     max: 1606 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
217%
T616 +
min: 298     avg: 350.9     median: 360 (14%)     max: 380 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
156%
T616 +
min: 1184     avg: 1410     median: 1464 (3%)     max: 1502 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
842 Points (8%)
206%
T616 +
min: 1663     avg: 1734     median: 1734 (17%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3870 Points (4%)
139%
T616 +
min: 5131     avg: 5378     median: 5377.5 (5%)     max: 5624 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
5574 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
1737 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
12972 ms (15%)
489%
T616 +
min: 2530.7     avg: 2711     median: 2650.4 (3%)     max: 3013.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
286%
T616 +
min: 12141     avg: 14092     median: 14522 (12%)     max: 15304 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T616 +
min: 45     avg: 55     median: 57.5 (16%)     max: 60 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
35 Points (6%)
229%
T616 +
min: 68     avg: 78     median: 80 (15%)     max: 86 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
189%
T616 +
200006 Points (19%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (7%)
195%
T616 +
min: 228124     avg: 230591     median: 229582 (14%)     max: 235075 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
181%
T616 +
min: 67445     avg: 69296     median: 69214 (19%)     max: 71312 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
min: 3040     avg: 3123     median: 3122.5 (0%)     max: 3205 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (12%)
172%
T616 +
min: 11341     avg: 17154     median: 13300 (21%)     max: 24988 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (21%)     max: 5221 Points
155%
T616 +
min: 7936     avg: 8004     median: 8011 (33%)     max: 8066 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4895 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T616 +
min: 52.5     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (39%)     max: 54.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T616 +
min: 192.9     avg: 197     median: 197 (6%)     max: 201 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T616 +
min: 17.7     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (23%)     max: 20.4 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T616 +
min: 199.3     avg: 213.7     median: 213.7 (6%)     max: 228 MB/s
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T616 +
min: 382     avg: 388     median: 388 (15%)     max: 394 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
53%
1 T616 +
min: 3.47     avg: 5.9     median: 5.8 (3%)     max: 8.44 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)
126%
1 T616 +
min: 0.91     avg: 1.2     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 1.398 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T616 → 226% n=15

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 02:37:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14016 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731461822s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14016 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 14016 +0.009s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.036s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.036s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.037s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.037s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.047s

#17 return log +0.002s ... 0.049s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)