Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T vs UNISOC T612

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

UNISOC T612

► remove from comparison UNISOC T612

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 ist ein SoC der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 stromsparenden Cortex-A55-Kernen, ebenfalls mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. 

Das T612 kommt mit einem LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz.

Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kern, 16 Shading Units und 614 MHz Taktung. Hier liegt auch der einzige Unterschied zum Unisoc Tiger T610: Die Grafikkarte besitzt beim T612 einen Kern weniger.

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 wird bei TSMC im 12nm-FinFet-Prozess hergestellt.

show full text
ModelMediatek Helio P22T MT8768TUNISOC T612
Series MediatekUNISOC
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock2300 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology16 nm12 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4XARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.unisoc.com
L3 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -51%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -40%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -36%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -31%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -12%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -8%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 0%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 32%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 32%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 37%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 38%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 39%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 40%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 288%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
338%
T612 +
min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (35%)     max: 2990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
806 Points (9%)
364%
T612 +
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
208%
T612 +
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (14%)     max: 347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
141%
T612 +
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
842 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3870 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T612 +
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T612 +
1598 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
12972 ms (15%)
436%
T612 +
2973 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
248%
T612 +
12581 Points (11%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T612 +
46 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
35 Points (7%)
209%
T612 +
73 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (7%)
167%
T612 +
196368 Points (12%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
179%
T612 +
68374 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (12%)
174%
T612 +
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (21%)     max: 15127 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (21%)     max: 5221 Points
147%
T612 +
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (32%)     max: 7776 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4895 Points (32%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T612 +
365 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
59%
1 T612 +
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)
84%
1 T612 +
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T612 → 222% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 10. 03:19:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731205164s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.025s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.025s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.025s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.026s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.031s

#17 return log +0.002s ... 0.033s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)