Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 435

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (SD435) ist ein unterer Mittelklasse SoC für (Android basierende) Smartphones und Tablets. Er wird im Gegensatz zum Snapdragon 630 noch in 28 nm gefertigt und bietet ebenfalls einen ARM Cortex-A53 Octa-Core Prozessorteil. Dieser ist jedoch nur mit bis zu 1,4 GHz getaktet. Das Integrierte X9 LTE Modem unterstützt Cat. 7 und dadurch maximal 300 Mbps Download und 100 Mbps Upload. Weiters ist eine Adreno 505 Grafikkarte integriert mit Support für Vulkan und OpenGL ES 3.1. WLAN wir 802.11ac unterstützt und Bluetooth in der Version 4.1. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 mit 800 MHz (daher wahrscheinlich Dual-Channel DDRL-1600). 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 450

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 450

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (SD450) ist ein unterer Mittelklasse SoC für (Android basierende) Smartphones und Tablets. Er bietet acht ARM Cortex-A53 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und wird bereits im modernen und stromsparenden 14nm Prozess gefertigt. Das Integrierte X9 LTE Modem unterstützt Cat. 7 und dadurch maximal 300 Mbps Download und 150 Mbps Upload. Weiters ist eine Adreno 506 Grafikkarte integriert mit Support für Vulkan und OpenGL ES 3.1. WLAN wir 802.11ac unterstützt (1x1 MU-MIMO max. 364 Mbps) und Bluetooth in der Version 4.1. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 (single channel). Die Videoengine unterstützt 1080p H.264 Encode und Decode und HEVC Decode.

show full text
ModelMediatek Helio P22T MT8768TQualcomm Snapdragon 435Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series MediatekQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
Serie: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT67952.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT67651.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT67552 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87521.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67521.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67531.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67501.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87321.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT81651.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67391.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67321.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67351.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87351.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67371.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6302.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6262.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6252 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4392 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4501.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4292 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM89521.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v21.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM89391.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM89361.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM89291.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM89161.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ80161.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6302.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6262.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6252 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4392 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4292 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM89521.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v21.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM89391.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM89361.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4351.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM89291.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM89161.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ80161.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2300 MHz1400 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology16 nm28 nm14 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4XAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerAdreno 506 GPU, X9 LTE Modem (300 / 150 Mbps)
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 505Qualcomm Adreno 506
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -51%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -40%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -36%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -31%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -12%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -8%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 0%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 32%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 32%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 37%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 38%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 39%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 40%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 288%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 450
0.2 pt (14%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -9%
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
0.1709 -4%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 14%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 20%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 30%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 60%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 65%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 73%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 76%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 77%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 628%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 435 +
7935 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 435 +
7745 Points (6%)
152%
1 SD 450 +
11735 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 435 +
min: 7095     avg: 8887     median: 9015.5 (7%)     max: 9345 Points
156%
1 SD 450 +
min: 13596     avg: 14216     median: 14036.5 (12%)     max: 15273 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
134%
435 +
min: 1028     avg: 1199     median: 1167.5 (14%)     max: 1352 Points
min: 1529     avg: 1773     median: 1789.5 (21%)     max: 1826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
806 Points (9%)
143%
435 +
min: 1002     avg: 1182     median: 1152 (13%)     max: 1382 Points
min: 1580     avg: 1760     median: 1777.5 (20%)     max: 1816 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
79%
1 SD 450 +
min: 131     avg: 140.3     median: 131 (5%)     max: 159 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
53%
1 SD 450 +
min: 493     avg: 631     median: 498 (1%)     max: 902 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
842 Points (8%)
79%
435 +
min: 637     avg: 663     median: 666 (7%)     max: 691 Points
min: 741     avg: 761     median: 758 (8%)     max: 787 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3870 Points (4%)
67%
435 +
min: 2210     avg: 2610     median: 2582 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
min: 3272     avg: 3862     median: 3907 (4%)     max: 4022 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
71%
435 +
577 Points (8%)
min: 709     avg: 733     median: 732.5 (10%)     max: 756 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
61%
435 +
2308 Points (6%)
min: 3625     avg: 3691     median: 3690.5 (9%)     max: 3756 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 3963     avg: 3981     median: 3980.5 (6%)     max: 3998 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 450 +
707 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 737     avg: 747     median: 746.5 (6%)     max: 756 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 1708     avg: 2113     median: 2112.5 (19%)     max: 2517 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 5993     avg: 6011     median: 6010.5 (12%)     max: 6028 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 3340     avg: 3381     median: 3381 (7%)     max: 3422 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 3683     avg: 3784     median: 3783.5 (10%)     max: 3884 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
12972 ms (15%)
102%
435 +
min: 11007     avg: 12667     median: 12750 (15%)     max: 13586 ms
min: 11012     avg: 11506     median: 11492.5 (13%)     max: 11863 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 435 +
1979 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
63%
435 +
min: 2689     avg: 3112     median: 3209 (3%)     max: 3314 Points
min: 3470     avg: 3981     median: 3997 (3%)     max: 4115 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
35 Points (6%)
77%
435 +
27 Points (5%)
min: 28     avg: 31.3     median: 31.5 (6%)     max: 34 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 42643     avg: 44884     median: 45572 (16%)     max: 46814 Points
127%
1 SD 450 +
min: 54731     avg: 57703     median: 57827.5 (20%)     max: 60077 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 435 +
min: 4213     avg: 4532     median: 4581.5 (14%)     max: 4750 Points
113%
1 SD 450 +
min: 4090     avg: 5355     median: 5158 (16%)     max: 7614 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 435 +
min: 14261     avg: 15880     median: 16055.5 (20%)     max: 17146 Points
123%
1 SD 450 +
min: 17204     avg: 19521     median: 19734 (24%)     max: 20891 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 9541     avg: 9568     median: 9563 (3%)     max: 9605 Points
127%
1 SD 450 +
min: 11937     avg: 12110     median: 12147 (4%)     max: 12208 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 435 +
min: 27075     avg: 27665     median: 27740 (17%)     max: 28105 Points
122%
1 SD 450 +
min: 33473     avg: 34106     median: 33975 (21%)     max: 35092 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 56672     avg: 57644     median: 57289 (10%)     max: 59326 Points
124%
1 SD 450 +
min: 56497     avg: 69869     median: 71167 (13%)     max: 73468 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 26309     avg: 28038     median: 28107 (24%)     max: 29697 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 13168     avg: 16031     median: 15671 (13%)     max: 19253 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 9371     avg: 9408     median: 9408 (2%)     max: 9444 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 28376     avg: 35468     median: 38797 (14%)     max: 39230 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
85%
1 SD 450 +
min: 89022     avg: 92277     median: 90185 (9%)     max: 97624 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
0 Iter./s (0%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
0 Iter./s (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
1582%
435 +
81667 Points (11%)
1974%
SD 450 +
101906 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (21%)     max: 5221 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4895 Points (32%)
76%
435 +
min: 3538     avg: 3737     median: 3710 (24%)     max: 3928 Points
min: 4171     avg: 4502     median: 4525.5 (30%)     max: 4759 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 435 +
min: 1646     avg: 1876     median: 1875.5 (10%)     max: 2105 Points
115%
1 SD 450 +
min: 2140     avg: 2239     median: 2157 (11%)     max: 2583 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 435 +
min: 4303     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (15%)     max: 9462 Points
64%
1 SD 450 +
min: 3145     avg: 5094     median: 4391 (9%)     max: 7635 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 435 +
min: 4316     avg: 4876     median: 4814.5 (24%)     max: 5438 Points
111%
1 SD 450 +
min: 4836     avg: 5364     median: 5357 (27%)     max: 6062 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
100%
1 SD 450 +
652 min (12%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 → 223% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 → 287% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 24. 05:08:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8506 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9946 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732421309s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:17:24 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8506 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#11 got single benchmarks 8506 +0.014s ... 0.029s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9946 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#13 got single benchmarks 9946 +0.016s ... 0.048s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.026s ... 0.074s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.077s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.082s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.082s

#21 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.093s

#22 return log +0s ... 0.093s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)