Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 430

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (SD430) ist ein unterer Mittelklasse SoC für (Android basierende) Smartphones und Tablets. Er wird im Gegensatz zum Snapdragon 630 noch in 28 nm gefertigt und bietet ebenfalls einen ARM Cortex-A53 Octa-Core Prozessorteil. Dieser ist jedoch nur mit bis zu 1,4 GHz (laut Wikipedia sogar nur 1,2 GHz) getaktet. Das Integrierte X6 LTE Modem unterstützt Cat. 4 und dadurch maximal 150 Mbps Download und 75 Mbps Upload. Weiters ist eine Adreno 505 Grafikkarte integriert mit Support für Vulkan und OpenGL ES 3.1. WLAN wir 802.11ac unterstützt und Bluetooth in der Version 4.1. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 mit 800 MHz (daher wahrscheinlich Dual-Channel DDRL-1600). 

show full text
ModelMediatek Helio P22T MT8768TQualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)
Series MediatekQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Serie: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2300 MHz1400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology16 nm28 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4XAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 4, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 505
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -51%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -40%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -36%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -31%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -12%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -8%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 0%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 32%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 32%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 37%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 38%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 39%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 40%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 288%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 430 +
min: 8253     avg: 9093     median: 9045 (8%)     max: 10364 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
137%
430 +
min: 1064     avg: 1195     median: 1193.5 (14%)     max: 1338 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
806 Points (9%)
149%
430 +
min: 1072     avg: 1195     median: 1200.5 (14%)     max: 1333 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
842 Points (8%)
78%
430 +
min: 619     avg: 657     median: 658.5 (7%)     max: 685 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3870 Points (4%)
66%
430 +
min: 2222     avg: 2553     median: 2552.5 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
77%
430 +
min: 613     avg: 629     median: 628.5 (9%)     max: 644 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
50%
430 +
min: 1706     avg: 1896     median: 1895.5 (5%)     max: 2085 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
12972 ms (15%)
98%
430 +
min: 10396     avg: 12677     median: 13194 (15%)     max: 14709 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
65%
430 +
min: 2604     avg: 3194     median: 3293.5 (3%)     max: 3438 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
35 Points (6%)
83%
430 +
min: 24     avg: 41.7     median: 29 (5%)     max: 72 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 430 +
min: 42798     avg: 45027     median: 44963.5 (15%)     max: 47066 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 430 +
min: 3999     avg: 4992     median: 4792 (15%)     max: 6830 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 430 +
min: 14313     avg: 16454     median: 16194 (20%)     max: 17949 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 430 +
min: 8556     avg: 9082     median: 9083 (3%)     max: 9583 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 430 +
min: 14989     avg: 26579     median: 27811 (17%)     max: 28218 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 430 +
min: 44992     avg: 56835     median: 58282 (10%)     max: 59990 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (21%)     max: 5221 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4895 Points (32%)
74%
430 +
min: 3408     avg: 3668     median: 3636 (24%)     max: 3892 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
100%
1 430 +
917 min (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 430 +
1783 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 430 +
3256 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 430 +
min: 3347     avg: 4577     median: 4689 (23%)     max: 5290 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) → 88% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 21:52:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8169 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731531146s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8169 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 8169 +0.017s ... 0.032s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.046s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.047s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.047s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.047s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.053s

#17 return log +0.002s ... 0.055s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)