Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8766B vs Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

Mediatek MT8766B

► remove from comparison Helio MT8766B

Der MediaTek MT8766B Helio A20 ist eine ARM-SoC für günstige Android-Smartphones und -tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das SoC besitzt 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz Takt und ähnelt daher dem Helios A20 (1.8 GHz).

Als Grafikchip kommt ein PowerVR GE8300 zum Einsatz (max. 1600x720 Pixel), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3/LPDDR4X.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G mit bis zu 150 Mbps Download (Cat-4) und 75 Mbps Upload (Cat-5). Bluetooth 5.0 (?) und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der A20 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahrens produziert.

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

show full text
ModelMediatek MT8766BMediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
Series Mediatek MT8 Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8768 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz2300 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology12 nm16 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8300, Dual-Channel LPDDR3 / LPDDR4X, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth, LTE Cat-4 DL / Cat-5 UL, H.264 Encode, H.265 DecodePowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X
iGPUPowerVR GE8300PowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8766B
0.2 pt (13%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
0.1709 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 9%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 24%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 31%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 43%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 75%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 81%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 89%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 697%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -40%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -36%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -31%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -12%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 -8%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 -6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 -6%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 0%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 32%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 32%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 37%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 38%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 39%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 40%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 288%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13779 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
853 Points (10%)
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
860 Points (10%)
806 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
133 Points (5%)
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
455 Points (1%)
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
783 Points (8%)
842 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2217 Points (2%)
3870 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
741 Points (10%)
813 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2043 Points (5%)
3775 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2112 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
722 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
725 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1727 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3305 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1865 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2227 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
11505 ms (13%)
12972 ms (15%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1609 ms (18%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
3920 Points (3%)
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
27 Points (5%)
35 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
15424 Points (13%)
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
24878 Points (20%)
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
4722 Points (1%)
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
30304 Points (11%)
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
75328 Points (7%)
105754 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2761 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
6844 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4808 Points (31%)
4895 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
6431 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (21%)     max: 5221 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8766B → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 100% n=17

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 14. 08:09:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13125 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731568179s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13125 +0.003s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 13125 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 13527 +0s ... 0.013s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.013s ... 0.026s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.027s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.027s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.028s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.032s

#17 return log +0.002s ... 0.034s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)