Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M

► remove from comparison Helio A22 MT6762M

Der Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M ist ein in 2018 vorgestellter Mittelklasse Quad-Core-Prozessor für Android basierte Smartphones und Tablets. Er integriert 4 ARM Cortex-A53 Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist eine PowerVR GE8320 welche mit 650 MHz getaktet wird. Der Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3-1688 bzw LPDDR4X-3200 (max. 6 GB). Drahtlose Technologien werden LTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL (Dual SIM) und 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN unterstützt. Der Festspeicher kann mit eMMC 5.1 angeschlossen werden. Die integrierte Videoengine unterstützt Encoding und Wiedergabe von H.264 und die Wiedergabe von H.265/HEVC.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 435

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (SD435) ist ein unterer Mittelklasse SoC für (Android basierende) Smartphones und Tablets. Er wird im Gegensatz zum Snapdragon 630 noch in 28 nm gefertigt und bietet ebenfalls einen ARM Cortex-A53 Octa-Core Prozessorteil. Dieser ist jedoch nur mit bis zu 1,4 GHz getaktet. Das Integrierte X9 LTE Modem unterstützt Cat. 7 und dadurch maximal 300 Mbps Download und 100 Mbps Upload. Weiters ist eine Adreno 505 Grafikkarte integriert mit Support für Vulkan und OpenGL ES 3.1. WLAN wir 802.11ac unterstützt und Bluetooth in der Version 4.1. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 mit 800 MHz (daher wahrscheinlich Dual-Channel DDRL-1600). 

show full text
ModelMediatek Helio A22 MT6762MQualcomm Snapdragon 435
Series Mediatek Helio 20Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Serie: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P25 compare2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A25 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T compare2.3 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 « 1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz1400 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology16 nm28 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200Adreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR GE8320Qualcomm Adreno 505
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 435 +
7935 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 435 +
7745 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 14128     avg: 14475     median: 14475 (12%)     max: 14822 Points
62%
435 +
min: 7095     avg: 8887     median: 9015.5 (7%)     max: 9345 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 763     avg: 851     median: 851 (10%)     max: 939 Points
137%
435 +
min: 1028     avg: 1199     median: 1167.5 (14%)     max: 1352 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 807     avg: 875     median: 875 (10%)     max: 943 Points
132%
435 +
min: 1002     avg: 1182     median: 1152 (13%)     max: 1382 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
161 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
538 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
825 Points (8%)
81%
435 +
min: 637     avg: 663     median: 666 (7%)     max: 691 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2471 Points (2%)
104%
435 +
min: 2210     avg: 2610     median: 2582 (3%)     max: 2889 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 435 +
577 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 435 +
2308 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 10740     avg: 10817     median: 10817 (13%)     max: 10894 ms
85%
435 +
min: 11007     avg: 12667     median: 12750 (15%)     max: 13586 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 435 +
1979 ms (22%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4332     avg: 4355     median: 4355 (4%)     max: 4378 Points
74%
435 +
min: 2689     avg: 3112     median: 3209 (3%)     max: 3314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 30     avg: 32     median: 32 (6%)     max: 34 Points
84%
435 +
27 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
51633 Points (18%)
88%
435 +
min: 42643     avg: 44884     median: 45572 (16%)     max: 46814 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
5659 Points (17%)
81%
435 +
min: 4213     avg: 4532     median: 4581.5 (14%)     max: 4750 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
18552 Points (23%)
87%
435 +
min: 14261     avg: 15880     median: 16055.5 (20%)     max: 17146 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
7993 Points (2%)
120%
435 +
min: 9541     avg: 9568     median: 9563 (3%)     max: 9605 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
29549 Points (18%)
94%
435 +
min: 27075     avg: 27665     median: 27740 (17%)     max: 28105 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
61753 Points (11%)
93%
435 +
min: 56672     avg: 57644     median: 57289 (10%)     max: 59326 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
15291 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
25641 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
4118 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
34075 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
79125 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
66909 Points (9%)
122%
435 +
81667 Points (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2975 Points (16%)
63%
435 +
min: 1646     avg: 1876     median: 1875.5 (10%)     max: 2105 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
5646 Points (12%)
122%
435 +
min: 4303     avg: 6883     median: 6882.5 (15%)     max: 9462 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4946 Points (32%)
75%
435 +
min: 3538     avg: 3737     median: 3710 (24%)     max: 3928 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6194     avg: 6607     median: 6606.5 (33%)     max: 7019 Points
73%
435 +
min: 4316     avg: 4876     median: 4814.5 (24%)     max: 5438 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 → 93% n=19

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 16. 19:55:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10951 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8506 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731783326s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10951 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 10951 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8506 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 8506 +0.012s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.042s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.044s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)