Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761

► remove from comparison Helio A22 MT6761

Der Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 ist ein in 2018 vorgestellter Mittelklasse Quad-Core-Prozessor für Android basierte Smartphones und Tablets. Er integriert 4 ARM Cortex-A53 Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist eine PowerVR GE8300 welche mit 660 MHz (unverifiziert) getaktet wird. Der Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3-1688 bzw LPDDR4X-3200 (max. 6 GB). Drahtlose Technologien werden LTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL (Dual SIM) und 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN unterstützt. Der Festspeicher kann mit eMMC 5.1 angeschlossen werden. Die integrierte Videoengine unterstützt Encoding und Wiedergabe von H.264 und die Wiedergabe von H.265/HEVC.

Im Vergleich zum Helio A22 MT6762M bietet der A22 MT6761 eine langsamere Grafikkarte (GE8300 versus GE8320).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 439

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 439

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (SD439) ist ein unterer Mittelklasse SoC für (Android basierende) Smartphones und Tablets. Er wird im Gegensatz zum Snapdragon 435 bereits im deutlich moderneren 12nm FinFET Verfahren gefertigt und taktet die 8 ARM Cortex-A53 Kerne mit 2 GHz deutlich höher. Die integrierte Adreno 505 Grafikkarte bleibt gleich und beim LTE Modem gibt es sogar einen Rückschritt (X6 mit nur Cat 4 Download 150 Mbps, Cat 5 Upload 75 Mbps). Drahtlos unterstützt der 439 mit 802.11ac (Wifi 5) WLAN und Bluetooth 5 relativ moderne Standards.

show full text
ModelMediatek Helio A22 MT6761Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series Mediatek Helio 20Qualcomm Snapdragon
Serie: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P25 compare2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A25 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T compare2.3 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology16 nm12 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200Adreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac Wave 2WLAN, Bluetooth 5.0, X6 LTE Cat 4/5 (150 / 75 Mbps),
iGPUPowerVR GE8300Qualcomm Adreno 505
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 439
0.3 pt (23%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -45%
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
0.1709 -42%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 -39%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -39%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -31%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -28%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -21%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 5%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 7%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 14%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 14%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 27%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 40%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 50%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 51%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 341%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11973 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12725     avg: 14468     median: 15004 (12%)     max: 15348 Points
min: 12096     avg: 12492     median: 12492.5 (10%)     max: 12809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 780     avg: 862     median: 863 (8%)     max: 940 Points
min: 1500     avg: 1597     median: 1608 (15%)     max: 1657 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 775     avg: 867     median: 873.5 (10%)     max: 954 Points
min: 1516     avg: 1588     median: 1598 (18%)     max: 1618 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
189 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
491 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 134     avg: 146.7     median: 140 (5%)     max: 166 Points
176 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 439     avg: 489.3     median: 488 (1%)     max: 541 Points
823 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
min: 176     avg: 176.7     median: 177 (1%)     max: 177 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
min: 809     avg: 819     median: 812 (3%)     max: 836 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 832     avg: 836     median: 835.5 (8%)     max: 839 Points
min: 863     avg: 880     median: 877.5 (9%)     max: 903 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2354     avg: 2395     median: 2395 (2%)     max: 2436 Points
min: 2987     avg: 3141     median: 3154 (3%)     max: 3267 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
831 Points (11%)
863 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2395 Points (6%)
3218 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2280 Points (4%)
3636 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
782 Points (12%)
792 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 746     avg: 768     median: 768 (6%)     max: 790 Points
712 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1779     avg: 1840     median: 1839.5 (17%)     max: 1900 Points
1563 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 3534     avg: 3584     median: 3584 (7%)     max: 3634 Points
5986 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 2001     avg: 2039     median: 2039 (4%)     max: 2077 Points
3444 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 2371     avg: 2414     median: 2414 (6%)     max: 2457 Points
3684 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9310.1     avg: 10624     median: 10447.5 (12%)     max: 12215 ms
min: 9768     avg: 9963     median: 9952.5 (12%)     max: 10143 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3920     avg: 4513     median: 4538.5 (4%)     max: 5041 Points
min: 4512     avg: 4731     median: 4755.5 (4%)     max: 4958 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
24 Points (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 30     avg: 34     median: 34 (6%)     max: 39 Points
min: 32     avg: 35.2     median: 35.5 (7%)     max: 38 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 50324     avg: 51497     median: 51390 (18%)     max: 52847 Points
min: 59539     avg: 60585     median: 60585 (21%)     max: 61631 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 5118     avg: 5808     median: 5580 (17%)     max: 6719 Points
min: 4849     avg: 5390     median: 5051 (16%)     max: 6271 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 18723     avg: 20143     median: 19749 (24%)     max: 22152 Points
min: 19841     avg: 21900     median: 22846 (28%)     max: 23014 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 8580     avg: 8683     median: 8699 (3%)     max: 8774 Points
min: 12224     avg: 12439     median: 12514 (4%)     max: 12579 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 28791     avg: 30002     median: 29990 (18%)     max: 31016 Points
min: 37733     avg: 37810     median: 37769 (23%)     max: 37928 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 63421     avg: 64636     median: 64782 (11%)     max: 65996 Points
min: 75175     avg: 77540     median: 77652 (14%)     max: 79792 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 6969     avg: 12860     median: 13894 (12%)     max: 16684 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 27672     avg: 29440     median: 29676.5 (24%)     max: 30734 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 9258     avg: 10049     median: 10067 (2%)     max: 10803 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 40746     avg: 41220     median: 41221.5 (15%)     max: 41690 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 84645     avg: 93569     median: 95218 (9%)     max: 99193 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
92766 Points (5%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
24526 Points (6%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 62858     avg: 66001     median: 67423 (9%)     max: 67723 Points
105520 Points (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
616 min (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4766     avg: 4827     median: 4827 (18%)     max: 4888 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2232     avg: 2674     median: 2673.5 (14%)     max: 3115 Points
min: 2490     avg: 2557     median: 2556.5 (14%)     max: 2623 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 3456     avg: 4810     median: 4810 (10%)     max: 6164 Points
min: 4775     avg: 5213     median: 5212.5 (11%)     max: 5650 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4195     avg: 4831     median: 4868 (32%)     max: 5511 Points
min: 4412     avg: 4632     median: 4643.5 (30%)     max: 4791 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4229     avg: 6389     median: 6729 (34%)     max: 7216 Points
min: 5880     avg: 6095     median: 6115 (31%)     max: 6228 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
198 Points (8%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 → 124% n=30

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 22. 16:07:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11369 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11405 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734880036s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11369 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 11369 +0.016s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11405 +0.002s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 11405 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.028s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.029s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.032s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.052s

#16 return log +0.016s ... 0.068s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)