Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 vs Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761

► remove from comparison  Helio A22 MT6761

Der Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 ist ein in 2018 vorgestellter Mittelklasse Quad-Core-Prozessor für Android basierte Smartphones und Tablets. Er integriert 4 ARM Cortex-A53 Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist eine PowerVR GE8300 welche mit 660 MHz (unverifiziert) getaktet wird. Der Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3-1688 bzw LPDDR4X-3200 (max. 6 GB). Drahtlose Technologien werden LTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL (Dual SIM) und 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN unterstützt. Der Festspeicher kann mit eMMC 5.1 angeschlossen werden. Die integrierte Videoengine unterstützt Encoding und Wiedergabe von H.264 und die Wiedergabe von H.265/HEVC.

Im Vergleich zum Helio A22 MT6762M bietet der A22 MT6761 eine langsamere Grafikkarte (GE8300 versus GE8320).

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison  Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

ModelMediatek Helio A22 MT6761Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series Mediatek Helio 20 Mediatek
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P25 compare2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A25 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T compare2.3 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz2300 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology16 nm16 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200PowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X
iGPUPowerVR GE8300PowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11973 Points (10%)
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (8%)     max: 1295 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
189 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
491 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 134     avg: 146.7     median: 140 (5%)     max: 166 Points
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 439     avg: 489.3     median: 488 (1%)     max: 541 Points
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 832     avg: 836     median: 835.5 (8%)     max: 839 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2354     avg: 2395     median: 2395 (2%)     max: 2436 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
831 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2395 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2280 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
782 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 746     avg: 768     median: 768 (6%)     max: 790 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1779     avg: 1840     median: 1839.5 (17%)     max: 1900 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 3534     avg: 3584     median: 3584 (7%)     max: 3634 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 2001     avg: 2039     median: 2039 (4%)     max: 2077 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 2371     avg: 2414     median: 2414 (6%)     max: 2457 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9310.1     avg: 10624     median: 10447.5 (12%)     max: 12215 ms
12972 ms (15%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3920     avg: 4513     median: 4538.5 (4%)     max: 5041 Points
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
24 Points (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 30     avg: 34     median: 34 (6%)     max: 39 Points
35 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 50324     avg: 51497     median: 51390 (18%)     max: 52847 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 5118     avg: 5808     median: 5580 (17%)     max: 6719 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 18723     avg: 20143     median: 19749 (24%)     max: 22152 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 8580     avg: 8683     median: 8699 (3%)     max: 8774 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 28791     avg: 30002     median: 29990 (18%)     max: 31016 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 63421     avg: 64636     median: 64782 (11%)     max: 65996 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
92766 Points (5%)
117837 Points (6%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
24526 Points (6%)
38139 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 62858     avg: 66001     median: 67423 (9%)     max: 67723 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
616 min (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4766     avg: 4827     median: 4827 (18%)     max: 4888 Points
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (19%)     max: 5221 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2232     avg: 2674     median: 2673.5 (14%)     max: 3115 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 3456     avg: 4810     median: 4810 (10%)     max: 6164 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (3%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
198 Points (8%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 113% n=16

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 22. 23:39:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11369 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734907173s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11369 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 11369 +0.017s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#10 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.037s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.038s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.042s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.051s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.052s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.052s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.053s

#19 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.061s

#20 return log +0.015s ... 0.077s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)