Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 vs Mediatek Helio A25

Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761

► remove from comparison Helio A22 MT6761

Der Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 ist ein in 2018 vorgestellter Mittelklasse Quad-Core-Prozessor für Android basierte Smartphones und Tablets. Er integriert 4 ARM Cortex-A53 Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist eine PowerVR GE8300 welche mit 660 MHz (unverifiziert) getaktet wird. Der Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR3-1688 bzw LPDDR4X-3200 (max. 6 GB). Drahtlose Technologien werden LTE Cat-7 DL / Cat-13 UL (Dual SIM) und 802.11a/b/g/n WLAN unterstützt. Der Festspeicher kann mit eMMC 5.1 angeschlossen werden. Die integrierte Videoengine unterstützt Encoding und Wiedergabe von H.264 und die Wiedergabe von H.265/HEVC.

Im Vergleich zum Helio A22 MT6762M bietet der A22 MT6761 eine langsamere Grafikkarte (GE8300 versus GE8320).

Mediatek Helio A25

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio A25

Der MediaTek Helio A25 ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,5 GHz.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz, der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G mit bis zu 150 Mbps Download und 50 Mbps Upload. Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis WiFi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahrens produziert.

show full text
ModelMediatek Helio A22 MT6761Mediatek Helio A25
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series Mediatek Helio 20Mediatek Mediatek Helio 20
Serie: Mediatek Helio 20 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P25 compare2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A251.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T compare2.3 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P25 compare2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A25 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T compare2.3 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757 compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A22 MT67612 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology16 nm12 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200UMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, LPDDR3-933 / LPDDR4-1200 / LPDDR4x-1600 Memory Controller, 1080p30 H.264 Video Encoder, H.264 / H.265 1080p30 Decoder
iGPUPowerVR GE8300PowerVR GE8320 ( - 600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio A25
0.3 pt (24%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -47%
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
0.1709 -45%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 -42%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -42%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -34%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -31%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -24%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -7%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949 -4%
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 2%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 2%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 9%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 9%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 21%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 34%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 43%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 44%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 50%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 322%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11973 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12725     avg: 14468     median: 15004 (12%)     max: 15348 Points
min: 11166     avg: 12236     median: 11236 (9%)     max: 14306 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 780     avg: 862     median: 863 (10%)     max: 940 Points
min: 744     avg: 944     median: 858 (10%)     max: 1160 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 775     avg: 867     median: 873.5 (10%)     max: 954 Points
min: 795     avg: 970     median: 892 (10%)     max: 1165 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
189 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
491 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 134     avg: 146.7     median: 140 (5%)     max: 166 Points
min: 124     avg: 135.5     median: 138.5 (5%)     max: 141 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 439     avg: 489.3     median: 488 (1%)     max: 541 Points
min: 445     avg: 758     median: 860 (2%)     max: 867 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 832     avg: 836     median: 835.5 (8%)     max: 839 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2354     avg: 2395     median: 2395 (2%)     max: 2436 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
831 Points (11%)
825 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2395 Points (6%)
3884 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2280 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
782 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 746     avg: 768     median: 768 (6%)     max: 790 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1779     avg: 1840     median: 1839.5 (17%)     max: 1900 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 3534     avg: 3584     median: 3584 (7%)     max: 3634 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 2001     avg: 2039     median: 2039 (4%)     max: 2077 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 2371     avg: 2414     median: 2414 (6%)     max: 2457 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9310.1     avg: 10624     median: 10447.5 (12%)     max: 12215 ms
min: 12118     avg: 13475     median: 13475 (16%)     max: 14832 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3920     avg: 4513     median: 4538.5 (4%)     max: 5041 Points
min: 3526     avg: 3780     median: 3779.5 (3%)     max: 4033 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
24 Points (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 30     avg: 34     median: 34 (6%)     max: 39 Points
min: 22     avg: 23     median: 23 (4%)     max: 24 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 50324     avg: 51497     median: 51390 (18%)     max: 52847 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 5118     avg: 5808     median: 5580 (17%)     max: 6719 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 18723     avg: 20143     median: 19749 (24%)     max: 22152 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 8580     avg: 8683     median: 8699 (3%)     max: 8774 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 28791     avg: 30002     median: 29990 (18%)     max: 31016 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 63421     avg: 64636     median: 64782 (11%)     max: 65996 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 28605     avg: 29187     median: 29187 (24%)     max: 29769 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 16319     avg: 16528     median: 16528 (13%)     max: 16737 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 6930     avg: 9522     median: 9521.5 (2%)     max: 12113 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 38709     avg: 40307     median: 40306.5 (15%)     max: 41904 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 93758     avg: 95543     median: 95543 (9%)     max: 97328 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
92766 Points (6%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
24526 Points (7%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 62858     avg: 66001     median: 67423 (9%)     max: 67723 Points
99375 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
616 min (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4766     avg: 4827     median: 4827 (20%)     max: 4888 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2232     avg: 2674     median: 2673.5 (14%)     max: 3115 Points
1383 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 3456     avg: 4810     median: 4810 (10%)     max: 6164 Points
3493 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4195     avg: 4831     median: 4868 (32%)     max: 5511 Points
min: 4302     avg: 4871     median: 5027 (33%)     max: 5364 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4229     avg: 6389     median: 6729 (34%)     max: 7216 Points
min: 6032     avg: 6704     median: 6426 (32%)     max: 7655 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
198 Points (8%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio A25 → 101% n=15

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 15:31:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11369 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11933 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732199503s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11369 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 11369 +0.015s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11933 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#10 got single benchmarks 11933 +0.002s ... 0.025s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.031s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.031s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.034s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.049s

#16 return log +0.003s ... 0.051s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)