Notebookcheck Logo

Intel HD Graphics 505 vs Intel HD Graphics 510 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605

Intel HD Graphics 505

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 505

Die Intel HD Graphics 505 ist eine Prozessorgrafikkarte der Mitte 2016 vorgestellten Apollo-Lake-Generation (z.B. Pentium N4200). Zwar glänzt die GPU mit einer sehr niedrigen Leistungsaufnahme, allerdings siedelt sich die Performance nur im Low-End-Segment an und ist für neuere Spiele selten ausreichend. Als maximale Ausbaustufe der Apollo-Lake-GPU verfügt die HD Graphics 505 über 18 Execution Units (EUs), die mit bis zu 750 MHz takten. Technisch basiert die GPU auf der Intel-Gen9-Architektur, die auch bei der teureren Skylake-Serie zum Einsatz kommt.

Mangels eigenem Grafikspeicher oder eDRAM-Cache greift die HD Graphics 505 über das Interface des Prozessors auf den System-RAM zu (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).

Performance

Die theoretische Grafikleistung entspricht in etwa der älteren Core-M-Grafikeinheit HD Graphics 5300. Dadurch sind nur wenige anspruchslose Spiele flüssig spielbar (siehe weiter unten). In unseren Tests erreichte z.B. nur wenige Spiele wie Dirt Rally oder Sims 4 spielbare Frameraten in niedrigsten Detailstufe.

Features

Der überarbeitete Videodecoder decodiert nun auch H.265-/HEVC-Videos vollständig in Hardware und arbeitet dadurch deutlich effizienter als bislang. Die Bildausgabe auf bis zu drei Displays erfolgt über DP/eDP oder HDMI (4K vermutlich nur bei 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des gesamten Chips liegt beim Pentium N4200 standardmäßig bei 6 Watt, sodass die GPU vor allem in (oftmals passiv gekühlten) Netbooks oder schlanken Notebooks zu finden ist. Optional kann die TDP auch auf 4 Watt abgesenkt werden, wodurch allerdings die Performance sinkt.

Intel HD Graphics 510

► remove from comparison Intel HD Graphics 510

Die Intel HD Graphics 510 (GT1) ist eine Prozessorgrafikkarte der im September 2015 vorgestellten Skylake-Generation (z.B. Pentium 4405U). Zwar glänzt die GPU mit einer niedrigen Leistungsaufnahme, allerdings siedelt sich die Performance nur im Low-End-Segment an und ist für neuere Spiele selten ausreichend. Als sogenannte GT1-Ausbaustufe der Skylake-GPU verfügt die HD Graphics 510 über 12 Execution Units (EUs), die je nach Modell mit bis zu 950 MHz takten.

Mangels eigenem Grafikspeicher oder eDRAM-Cache greift die HD Graphics 510 über das Interface des Prozessors auf den System-RAM zu (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866).

Performance

Die exakte Leistung der HD Graphics 510 dürfte sich knapp unterhalb der älteren HD Graphics 4400 ansiedeln, sodass aktuelle Spiele (Stand 2015) nur in wenigen Fällen und in niedrigsten Einstellungen flüssig dargestellt werden.

Features

Der überarbeitete Videodecoder decodiert nun auch H.265-/HEVC-Videos vollständig in Hardware und arbeitet dadurch deutlich effizienter als bislang. Die Bildausgabe erfolgt über DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (max. 3.840 x 2.160 @ 60 Hz), wohingegen HDMI nur in der älteren Version 1.4a angeboten wird. Ein HDMI-2.0-Anschluss kann aber mittels Konverter von DisplayPort ergänzt werden. Maximal lassen sich drei Displays parallel angesteuern.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des gesamten Chips liegt standardmäßig bei 15 Watt, sodass die GPU vor allem in Ultrabooks oder oder schlanken Notebooks zu finden ist. Teils kann die TDP auch auf 10 Watt abgesenkt werden, wodurch allerdings die Performance sinkt.

Intel UHD Graphics 605

► remove from comparison Intel UHD Graphics 605

Die Intel UHD Graphics 605 ist eine Prozessorgrafikkarte der Ende 2017 vorgestellten Gemini-Lake-Generation (z.B. Pentium Silver N5000). Zwar glänzt die GPU mit einer sehr niedrigen Leistungsaufnahme, allerdings siedelt sich die Performance nur im Low-End-Segment an und ist für neuere Spiele nicht ausreichend. Als maximale Ausbaustufe der Gemini-Lake-GPU verfügt die UHD Graphics 605 über 18 Execution Units (EUs), die mit bis zu 750 MHz takten. Technisch basiert die GPU auf der Intel-Gen9-Architektur, die auch bei der teureren Skylake-Serie zum Einsatz kommt. Im Vergleich zur alten Intel HD Graphics 505 in Apollo Lake, wurden nur die Displayausgänge verbessert (Gen. 10). Performance und Architektur blieben unangetastet. 

Mangels eigenem Grafikspeicher oder eDRAM-Cache greift die UHD Graphics 605 über das Interface des Prozessors auf den System-RAM zu (2x 64 Bit DDR3L/LPDDR4-2400).

Performance

Die theoretische Grafikleistung entspricht in etwa der älteren Core-M-Grafikeinheit HD Graphics 5300. Dadurch sind nur wenige anspruchslose Spiele flüssig spielbar (siehe auch die Spielebenchmarks der Intel HD Graphics 505). In unseren Tests erreichte z.B. nur wenige Spiele wie Dirt Rally oder Sims 4 spielbare Frameraten in niedrigsten Detailstufe.

Features

Der überarbeitete Videodecoder decodiert und encodiert H.265-/HEVC-Videos (8b und 10b) sowie VP9 vollständig in Hardware und arbeitet dadurch deutlich effizienter als bislang. Bei der Bildausgabe unterstützt der SoC dank Gen.10 nun auch HDMI 2.0a mit HDCP 2.2 un DisplayPort 1.2a nativ.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des gesamten Chips liegt beim Pentium N5000 standardmäßig bei 6 Watt, sodass die GPU vor allem in (oftmals passiv gekühlten) Netbooks oder schlanken Notebooks zu finden ist. Optional kann die TDP auch auf 4,8 Watt abgesenkt werden, wodurch allerdings die Performance sinkt.

Intel HD Graphics 505Intel HD Graphics 510Intel UHD Graphics 605
Gen. 9 Serie
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 72 @ 0.35 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 24 @ 0.35 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 12 @ 0.3 - 0.95 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 0.3 - 0.75 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 12 @ 0.3 - 0.7 GHz64/128 Bit
CodenameApollo LakeSkylake GT1Gemini Lake
ArchitekturGen. 9 Apollo LakeGen. 9 SkylakeGen. 9 Apollo Lake
Pipelines18 - unified12 - unified18 - unified
Kerntakt300 - 750 (Boost) MHz300 - 950 (Boost) MHz300 - 750 (Boost) MHz
Speicherbandbreite64/128 Bit64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Shared Memoryjajaja
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4
Herstellungsprozess14 nm14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSyncQuickSync
Erscheinungsdatum01.09.2016 01.09.2015 11.12.2017
SpeichertypDDR3/DDR4DDR4 / LPDDR4
Herstellerseiteark.intel.com
CPU in HD Graphics 505GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium N42004 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz750 MHz
Intel Atom x7-E39504 x 1600 MHz, 12 W500 MHz650 MHz
min. - max.200 - 500 MHz650 - 750 MHz
CPU in HD Graphics 510GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-6198DU2 x 2300 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1000 MHz
Intel Pentium 4405U2 x 2100 MHz, 15 W300 MHz950 MHz
min. - max.200 - 500 MHz650 - 1000 MHz
CPU in UHD Graphics 605GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Pentium Silver J50404 x 2000 MHz, 10 W250 MHz800 MHz
Intel Pentium Silver N50304 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz750 MHz
Intel Pentium Silver N50004 x 1100 MHz, 6 W200 MHz750 MHz
min. - max.200 - 500 MHz650 - 1000 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 505
0.2 pt (1%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 510
0.3 pt (1%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - UHD Graphics 605
0.2 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 87     avg: 115.8     median: 107.5 (0%)     max: 161 Points
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 76     avg: 101.5     median: 94 (0%)     max: 142 Points
113 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 27199     avg: 32979     median: 32480.5 (3%)     max: 41454 Points
43274 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 8531     avg: 19014     median: 18860 (2%)     max: 28843 Points
26846 Points (3%)
min: 13350     avg: 16118     median: 16553.5 (2%)     max: 18016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 2411     avg: 2877     median: 2837.5 (3%)     max: 3558 Points
4721 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2844     avg: 3609     median: 3413.5 (1%)     max: 4738 Points
5664 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 324     avg: 417.3     median: 383 (1%)     max: 565 Points
570 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 344     avg: 448.6     median: 408 (0%)     max: 606 Points
621 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 26964     avg: 33899     median: 36228 (4%)     max: 39766 Points
62653 Points (7%)
min: 20859     avg: 25930     median: 26031 (3%)     max: 30797 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
2870 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
2805 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1628 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1450 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
2642 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
2628 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
20337 Points (100%)
1789 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
2025 Points (7%)
1636 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
882 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
281 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 1614     avg: 1751     median: 1619 (2%)     max: 2019 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 1849     avg: 2059     median: 1893 (1%)     max: 2434 Points
985 Points (1%)
847 Points (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 505
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 1957     avg: 2351     median: 2350.5 (1%)     max: 2744 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 510
3798 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel UHD Graphics 605
2162 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 505
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 1656     avg: 2073     median: 2072.5 (1%)     max: 2489 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 510
3125 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel UHD Graphics 605
1785 Points (1%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
8388 Points (4%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
5802 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 505
3DMark 06
min: 3721     avg: 4303     median: 4302.5 (6%)     max: 4884 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 510
7253 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 2882     avg: 4208     median: 4171 (5%)     max: 5570 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
1.7 fps (1%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
9.3 fps (3%)
6.5 fps (2%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
10.8 fps (5%)
7.2 fps (3%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
8.9 fps (2%)
13.5 fps (3%)
9 fps (2%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + Intel HD Graphics 505
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
0.9 fps (1%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + Intel HD Graphics 505
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
1.2 fps (1%)
specvp11 sw-02 + Intel HD Graphics 505
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
6.6 fps (5%)
specvp11 proe-05 + Intel HD Graphics 505
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
0.8 fps (1%)
specvp11 maya-03 + Intel HD Graphics 505
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
5.6 fps (4%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + Intel HD Graphics 505
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
8.7 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + Intel HD Graphics 505
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
1.3 fps (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 505
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 510
7348 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 3505     avg: 3812     median: 3773 (3%)     max: 4366 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 9.78     avg: 12.1     median: 12.5 (4%)     max: 13.53 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 510
17.2 fps (6%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 15.24     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (6%)     max: 20.5 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 510
28 fps (2%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
4.8 fps (1%)
min: 5.9     avg: 6.4     median: 6.4 (1%)     max: 6.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
12 fps (1%)
min: 9.9     avg: 12.8     median: 12.8 (1%)     max: 15.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 10     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (1%)     max: 10.3 fps
35.9 fps (4%)
min: 7.1     avg: 11     median: 11.3 (1%)     max: 14.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
14.1 fps (0%)
51.7 fps (1%)
min: 13     avg: 17.6     median: 16.5 (0%)     max: 23.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
18.9 fps (1%)
64.6 fps (3%)
min: 16     avg: 23.8     median: 22.1 (1%)     max: 33.4 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 505
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
47.2 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 510
121.9 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 32     avg: 43.1     median: 45.5 (0%)     max: 51.9 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
23.3 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
2 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 62     avg: 87     median: 87 (0%)     max: 112 Samples/s
167 Samples/s (1%)
min: 67     avg: 93.5     median: 93.5 (0%)     max: 120 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 93     avg: 141.5     median: 141.5 (0%)     max: 190 Samples/s
302 Samples/s (1%)
min: 96     avg: 142     median: 142 (0%)     max: 188 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
382 Points (0%)
500 Points (1%)
min: 432     avg: 490.5     median: 490.5 (1%)     max: 549 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19 Watt (3%)
min: 10.3     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 11.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
11.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.1 fps per Watt (9%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
515 MHz (20%)

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 505 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 510 → 191% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 107% n=23

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

low 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
31.1  fps
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
7 8.2 ~ 8 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
49.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
39  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
26.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
24.9  fps
QHD 2560x1440
UHD Graphics 605:
23.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
UHD Graphics 605:
15  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
6.5 10.9 ~ 9 fps
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
5.8  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
1  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
11.7 (!) 17.6 ~ 15 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
1  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
7.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
4.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
1  fps
400%
UHD Graphics 605:
4  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
2  fps
200%
UHD Graphics 605:
4  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
8.5  fps
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
12  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
3.7  fps
124%
UHD Graphics 605:
4.6  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
8.8  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
3  fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
3  fps
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
53  fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
8.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
5.5  fps
127%
UHD Graphics 605:
5 6.4 7.2 8.6 9.1 ~ 7 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
3.5 5.9 6 6.1 ~ 5 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
3.1 5.3 5.5 5.5 ~ 5 fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
3.4 4.2 4.4 5.2 7.5 ~ 5 fps
med. 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
3.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
2.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
2  fps
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
4.6  fps
113%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.2  fps
low 1280x720
UHD Graphics 605:
7  fps
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
13  fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
13  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
28  fps
143%
UHD Graphics 605:
38 41.4 ~ 40 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
25.2  fps
143%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.5 36.5 ~ 36 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
17 18.4 ~ 18 fps
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
14.7  fps
128%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
21.4 26.6 ~ 24 fps
108%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.6 26.8 27.8 ~ 26 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 505:
15.3  fps
65%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.9 10 ~ 10 fps
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
5.4  fps
102%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
5.9  fps
54%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.2  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
12.1  fps
74%
UHD Graphics 605:
9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
14.4  fps
127%
HD Graphics 510:
18.3  fps
55%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.9  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
2.3  fps
865%
HD Graphics 510:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
15.4  fps
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 510:
70.6  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
41.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
9.7  fps
253%
HD Graphics 510:
24.5  fps
131%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.7  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 510:
9.4  fps
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
5.1  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
7.1  fps
161%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4  fps
med. 1366x768
UHD Graphics 605:
8.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
5.2  fps
258%
HD Graphics 510:
13.4  fps
83%
UHD Graphics 605:
4.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
3.1  fps
248%
HD Graphics 510:
7.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
5.6 6.1 6.2 8.8 ~ 7 fps
159%
HD Graphics 510:
11.1  fps
99%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
4 4 4.1 4.5 ~ 4 fps
175%
HD Graphics 510:
7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
15  fps
167%
HD Graphics 510:
25  fps
82%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
8.9  fps
179%
HD Graphics 510:
15.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
6.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
4.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
10.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
6.3  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
11.8  fps
169%
HD Graphics 510:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
6.5  fps
169%
HD Graphics 510:
11  fps
low 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
25.2  fps
193%
HD Graphics 510:
48.7  fps
95%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7 24.7 ~ 24 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
16.4  fps
178%
HD Graphics 510:
29.2  fps
87%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
20.7  fps
188%
HD Graphics 510:
38.9  fps
104%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
13.8  fps
183%
HD Graphics 510:
25.2  fps
114%
UHD Graphics 605:
15.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
32  fps
207%
HD Graphics 510:
66.2  fps
116%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.5 33.7 35 35.9 36.5 49.5 ~ 37 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
22  fps
190%
HD Graphics 510:
41.8  fps
68%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.5 14 14.3 14.3 15.1 18.6 ~ 15 fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
5.9 6.7 7.4 7.8 10.6 ~ 8 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
5.9 6.7 10 ~ 8 fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
1.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
36.5  fps
302%
HD Graphics 510:
110.4  fps
115%
UHD Graphics 605:
42  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
12.7  fps
152%
HD Graphics 510:
19.3  fps
98%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
9.5  fps
325%
HD Graphics 510:
30.9  fps
116%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5 11.6 11.7 ~ 11 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
4.3  fps
623%
HD Graphics 510:
26.8  fps
216%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.3  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
7.3  fps
432%
HD Graphics 510:
31.5  fps
149%
UHD Graphics 605:
10.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
6.9  fps
322%
HD Graphics 510:
22.2  fps
138%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
4  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
10.6  fps
74%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
7.5  fps
83%
UHD Graphics 605:
6.2  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
28  fps
257%
HD Graphics 510:
72  fps
111%
UHD Graphics 605:
31  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
14  fps
336%
HD Graphics 510:
47  fps
143%
UHD Graphics 605:
20  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
13  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
18.3  fps
96%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
14.1  fps
93%
UHD Graphics 605:
13.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
12.4  fps
116%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.4  fps
med. 1344x756
100%
HD Graphics 505:
7.7  fps
121%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.3  fps
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
75.2  fps
231%
HD Graphics 510:
173.7  fps
129%
UHD Graphics 605:
96.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
18.4  fps
175%
HD Graphics 510:
32.2  fps
118%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.8  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
10.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
14.2  fps
101%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
9.3  fps
102%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
51.5  fps
263%
HD Graphics 510:
135.5  fps
114%
UHD Graphics 605:
58.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
19  fps
173%
HD Graphics 510:
32.8  fps
87%
UHD Graphics 605:
16.5  fps
high 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
6.5 7.8 ~ 7 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
4.2 5.1 ~ 5 fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
3.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
17.1 20.9 ~ 19 fps
176%
HD Graphics 510:
33.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
13.5 15.2 ~ 14 fps
161%
HD Graphics 510:
22.5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
8.3 9.5 ~ 9 fps
177%
HD Graphics 510:
15.9  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
36.8  fps
94%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
19.4  fps
88%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
12.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
19.4 21 21.2 21.3 22.2 22.9 23.7 23.9 24.6 24.9 25.4 25.5 30.3 30.6 32.3 ~ 25 fps
156%
HD Graphics 510:
39  fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.8 20.1 23.5 24.4 25.3 26.4 26.9 27.4 33.2 ~ 25 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
8.3 10.2 10.7 10.8 12.2 12.9 13.3 13.6 14 14.2 14.4 17.3 17.5 18.6 ~ 13 fps
155%
HD Graphics 510:
20.1  fps
108%
UHD Graphics 605:
10.8 11.1 13.2 13.5 13.7 14.7 16.6 17.2 ~ 14 fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
9.2 9.4 10.9 10.9 11 11.3 11.5 11.5 12 15.1 16.2 ~ 12 fps
148%
HD Graphics 510:
17.7  fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.4 9.5 10.4 11.6 11.6 12.2 12.9 15.2 ~ 12 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
HD Graphics 505:
2.5 3.1 ~ 3 fps
133%
UHD Graphics 605:
2.8 3.3 4.2 4.3 ~ 4 fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
31.2 42.9 ~ 37 fps
142%
HD Graphics 510:
52.7  fps
85%
UHD Graphics 605:
31.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
17.4 21.6 ~ 20 fps
120%
HD Graphics 510:
23.9  fps
93%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
11.2  fps
145%
HD Graphics 510:
16.2  fps
112%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
34.6  fps
93%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
16.9  fps
101%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
13.5  fps
104%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
35 36.7 ~ 36 fps
128%
UHD Graphics 605:
44.4 48.4 ~ 46 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
30.9 31 ~ 31 fps
87%
UHD Graphics 605:
26.4 27.5 ~ 27 fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
21.2  fps
80%
UHD Graphics 605:
16.4 17.1 ~ 17 fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
30.1  fps
96%
UHD Graphics 605:
28.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
19.6  fps
108%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
17  fps
109%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
31.1  fps
113%
UHD Graphics 605:
35  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
14.8  fps
122%
UHD Graphics 605:
18  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
9.3  fps
123%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4  fps
low 1280x720
100%
HD Graphics 505:
21.1  fps
94%
UHD Graphics 605:
19.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
11.6  fps
106%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
7.1  fps
106%
UHD Graphics 605:
7.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
31.3  fps
88%
UHD Graphics 605:
27.4  fps
high 1366x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
18.9  fps
112%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
6.7  fps
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
100%
HD Graphics 505:
47.2  fps
118%
UHD Graphics 605:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
25.2  fps
90%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7  fps
high 1360x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
15.7  fps
97%
UHD Graphics 605:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
69.7  fps
113%
UHD Graphics 605:
78.7  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
15.9  fps
109%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.4  fps
high 1360x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
9.7  fps
103%
UHD Graphics 605:
10  fps
ultra 1920x1080
UHD Graphics 605:
3.9  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100%
HD Graphics 505:
62.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
HD Graphics 505:
25.2  fps

Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 505 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 510 → 234%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 224%

Average Gaming Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 111%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 114%

Intel UHD Graphics 605lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Hearthstone31.1
F1 20198
League of Legends49.83926.624.923.615
Total War: Three Kingdoms9
Anno 18005.8
The Division 21
Dirt Rally 2.015
Far Cry New Dawn1
Apex Legends7.2
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey4
Forza Horizon 44
Shadow of the Tomb Raider4
Strange Brigade8.5
F1 201812
Monster Hunter World4.6
The Crew 28.8
Far Cry 53
World of Tanks enCore538.9
X-Plane 11.11755
Kingdom Come: Deliverance5.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark53.27
ELEX5.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of War7
F1 201713
Team Fortress 2403618
Dirt 418.8
Rocket League2610
Prey5.5
Ghost Recon Wildlands3.2
For Honor9
Resident Evil 77.9
Civilization VI12.75.5
Overwatch11.48.3
The Division4.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider6.9
Rainbow Six Siege12.3
World of Warships2414.3
Metal Gear Solid V21.615.8
Dota 2 Reborn371588
The Witcher 31.2
Dirt Rally4212.5
GTA V119.29
Battlefield Hardline10.99.54
Dragon Age: Inquisition7.86.2
F1 2014312013
Alien: Isolation17.513.1
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor14.49.3
Sims 496.921.810.5
Risen 3: Titan Lords14.39.5
GRID: Autosport58.516.512.5
GRID 234.717.1
BioShock Infinite2514124
Tomb Raider31.618.512.5
Dead Space 332.317.114.1
Counter-Strike: GO462717
Diablo III28.821.118.612.5
Anno 2070351811.4
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim19.912.37.5
Deus Ex Human Revolution27.421.26.7
Dirt 355.622.715.212.5
StarCraft 278.717.4103.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
44
14
2
29
2

18


8


1


1


Intel HD Graphics 505lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Just Cause 44.8
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider2
Monster Hunter World3.7
Far Cry 53
X-Plane 11.115.5
Star Wars Battlefront 22.8
Need for Speed Payback2
Assassin´s Creed Origins2
ELEX4.6
F1 201713
Team Fortress 22825.2
Dirt 414.7
Rocket League2415.3
Prey5.4
Ghost Recon Wildlands5.9
For Honor12.1
Resident Evil 714.4
Titanfall 22.3
Civilization VI9.7
Deus Ex Mankind Divided5.1
Overwatch7.1
The Division5.23.1
Far Cry Primal3
Rise of the Tomb Raider74
Rainbow Six Siege158.9
Just Cause 36.64.1
Star Wars Battlefront10.96.3
Anno 220511.86.5
World of Warships25.216.4
Metal Gear Solid V20.713.8
Dota 2 Reborn3222
Dirt Rally36.512.7
GTA V9.54.3
Battlefield Hardline7.36.9
Dragon Age: Inquisition10.67.5
F1 20142814
Alien: Isolation18.314.1
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor12.47.7
Sims 475.218.4
Risen 3: Titan Lords14.29.3
GRID: Autosport51.519
Thief753.5
Battlefield 419149
GRID 236.819.412.5
BioShock Infinite2513123
Tomb Raider372011.2
Dead Space 334.616.913.5
Counter-Strike: GO363121.2
Diablo III30.119.617
Anno 207031.114.89.3
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim21.111.67.1
Deus Ex Human Revolution31.318.9
Dirt 347.225.215.7
StarCraft 269.715.99.7
World of Warcraft62.325.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
42
11
3
33
1

13


1








Intel HD Graphics 510lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Resident Evil 718.3
Titanfall 219.915.4
Farming Simulator 1770.641.3
Civilization VI24.59.4
The Division13.47.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider11.17
Rainbow Six Siege2515.9
Anno 220519.911
World of Warships48.729.2
Metal Gear Solid V38.925.2
Dota 2 Reborn66.241.8
Dirt Rally110.419.3
GTA V30.926.8
Battlefield Hardline31.522.2
F1 20147247
Sims 4173.732.2
GRID: Autosport135.532.8
Battlefield 433.422.515.9
BioShock Infinite3920.117.7
Tomb Raider52.723.916.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
7
7
4
2
14
5

3











Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.28
log 27. 19:57:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7542 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6475 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 8270 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735325871s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Dec 2024 05:19:07 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7542 +0.021s ... 0.04s

#10 got single benchmarks 7542 +0.018s ... 0.059s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 6475 +0.004s ... 0.062s

#12 got single benchmarks 6475 +0.005s ... 0.067s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 8270 +0.003s ... 0.07s

#14 got single benchmarks 8270 +0.013s ... 0.084s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.134s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.134s

#18 Got 389 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.153s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.153s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.157s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.18s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.18s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.181s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)