Intel HD Graphics 500 vs Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) vs Intel UHD Graphics 605
Intel HD Graphics 500 ► remove from comparison
Die Intel HD Graphics 500 ist eine Prozessorgrafikkarte der Mitte 2016 vorgestellten Apollo-Lake-Generation (z.B. Celeron N3450 und Celeron N3350 ). Zwar glänzt die GPU mit einer sehr niedrigen Leistungsaufnahme, allerdings siedelt sich die Performance nur im untersten Low-End-Segment an und ist für neuere Spiele zumeist nicht ausreichend. Als teildeaktivierte Variante der Apollo-Lake-GPU verfügt die HD Graphics 500 nur über 12 Execution Units (HD Graphics 505: 18 EUs), die je nach Modell mit bis zu 650 oder 700 MHz takten. Technisch basiert die GPU auf der Intel-Gen9-Architektur, die auch bei der teureren Skylake-Serie zum Einsatz kommt.
Mangels eigenem Grafikspeicher oder eDRAM-Cache greift die HD Graphics 500 über das Interface des Prozessors auf den System-RAM zu (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).
Performance
Die HD Graphics 500 dürfte sich noch knapp unterhalb der älteren Broadwell-Grafikeinheit HD Graphics (Broadwell) ansiedeln, sodass aktuelle Spiele (Stand 2016) nur in den seltensten Fällen und in sehr niedrigen Einstellungen flüssig dargestellt werden.
Features
Der überarbeitete Videodecoder decodiert nun auch H.265-/HEVC-Videos vollständig in Hardware und arbeitet dadurch deutlich effizienter als bislang. Die Bildausgabe auf bis zu drei Displays erfolgt über DP/eDP oder HDMI (4K vermutlich nur bei 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).
Leistungsaufnahme
Die TDP des gesamten SoCs liegt bei standardmäßig bei 6 Watt, sodass die GPU vor allem in (oftmals passiv gekühlten) Netbooks oder schlanken Notebooks zu finden ist. Optional kann die TDP auch auf 4 Watt abgesenkt werden, wodurch allerdings die Performance sinkt.
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) ► remove from comparison
Die Intel HD Graphics ist eine in den Haswell Prozessoren integrierte Grafikkarte. Sie kommt in den mobilen Celeron- und Pentium-Modellen zu Einsatz. Je nach Prozessormodell kann die HD Graphics (auch GT1 genannt) unterschiedlich getaktet sein (typischerweise 200 MHz Basis- und 1.000 MHz Turbo-Takt). Dies sowie die Geschwindigkeit des angebundenen Arbeitsspeichers beeinflusst die Performance entscheidend.
Der Grafikkern wurde im Vergleich zum Intel HD Graphics 4000 der Ivy-Bridge-Generation in verschiedenen Punkten weiterentwickelt. So unterstützt die GPU nun mit DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 und OpenGL 4.0 alle wichtigen aktuellen Standards. Auch ein verbesserter Decoder für 4K-Videos sowie ein überarbeiteter Quick-Sync-Encoder (bei vielen Einstiegsmodellen deaktiviert) sind mit an Bord.
Die Performance der HD Graphics (Haswell) liegt durch die Beschneidung auf nur noch 10 EUs deutlich unter der HD Graphics 4400 /4600 und etwa auf dem Level der älteren HD Graphics 3000 oder AMDs Radeon HD 8250 . Nur die wenigsten aktuellen Spiele des Jahres 2013, beispielsweise das sehr anspruchslose Dota 2, können mit niedrigsten Details flüssig dargestellt werden.
Der Stromverbrauch ist dank des 22-Nanometer-Prozesses mit Tri-Gate-Transistoren relativ gering und wird dynamisch vom TDP-Budget des gesamten Chips abgezweigt. Die HD Graphics (Haswell) wird in Dual-Core-Prozessoren der ULV- und regulären 37-Watt-Klasse eingesetzt.
Weitere Details zur Grafikkartenarchitektur der Haswell Generation finden Sie in unserem Artikel zur Haswell-Architektur sowie dem Testbericht der HD Graphics 4600 .
Intel UHD Graphics 605 ► remove from comparison
Die Intel UHD Graphics 605 ist eine Prozessorgrafikkarte der Ende 2017 vorgestellten Gemini-Lake-Generation (z.B. Pentium Silver N5000). Zwar glänzt die GPU mit einer sehr niedrigen Leistungsaufnahme, allerdings siedelt sich die Performance nur im Low-End-Segment an und ist für neuere Spiele nicht ausreichend. Als maximale Ausbaustufe der Gemini-Lake-GPU verfügt die UHD Graphics 605 über 18 Execution Units (EUs), die mit bis zu 750 MHz takten. Technisch basiert die GPU auf der Intel-Gen9-Architektur, die auch bei der teureren Skylake-Serie zum Einsatz kommt. Im Vergleich zur alten Intel HD Graphics 505 in Apollo Lake , wurden nur die Displayausgänge verbessert (Gen. 10). Performance und Architektur blieben unangetastet.
Mangels eigenem Grafikspeicher oder eDRAM-Cache greift die UHD Graphics 605 über das Interface des Prozessors auf den System-RAM zu (2x 64 Bit DDR3L/LPDDR4-2400).
Performance
Die theoretische Grafikleistung entspricht in etwa der älteren Core-M-Grafikeinheit HD Graphics 5300 . Dadurch sind nur wenige anspruchslose Spiele flüssig spielbar (siehe auch die Spielebenchmarks der Intel HD Graphics 505 ). In unseren Tests erreichte z.B. nur wenige Spiele wie Dirt Rally oder Sims 4 spielbare Frameraten in niedrigsten Detailstufe.
Features
Der überarbeitete Videodecoder decodiert und encodiert H.265-/HEVC-Videos (8b und 10b) sowie VP9 vollständig in Hardware und arbeitet dadurch deutlich effizienter als bislang. Bei der Bildausgabe unterstützt der SoC dank Gen.10 nun auch HDMI 2.0a mit HDCP 2.2 un DisplayPort 1.2a nativ.
Leistungsaufnahme
Die TDP des gesamten Chips liegt beim Pentium N5000 standardmäßig bei 6 Watt, sodass die GPU vor allem in (oftmals passiv gekühlten) Netbooks oder schlanken Notebooks zu finden ist. Optional kann die TDP auch auf 4,8 Watt abgesenkt werden, wodurch allerdings die Performance sinkt.
Intel HD Graphics 500 Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) Intel UHD Graphics 605 Gen. 9 Serie Codename Apollo Lake Haswell GT1 Gemini Lake Architektur Gen. 9 Apollo Lake Gen. 7.5 Haswell Gen. 9 Apollo Lake Pipelines 12 - unified 10 - unified 18 - unified Kerntakt 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz 200 - 1000 (Boost) MHz 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz Speicherbandbreite 64/128 Bit 64/128 Bit 64/128 Bit Shared Memory ja ja ja API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 Herstellungsprozess 14 nm 22 nm 14 nm Features QuickSync QuickSync Erscheinungsdatum 01.09.2016 01.10.2012 11.12.2017 Speichertyp DDR4 / LPDDR4 Herstellerseite ark.intel.com
CPU in HD Graphics 500 GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo Intel Celeron J3455 4 x 1500 MHz, 10 W 250 MHz 750 MHz Intel Celeron N3450 4 x 1100 MHz, 6 W 200 MHz 700 MHz Intel Celeron J3355 2 x 2000 MHz, 10 W 250 MHz 700 MHz Intel Celeron N3350 2 x 1100 MHz, 6 W 200 MHz 650 MHz min. - max. 200 - 250 MHz 650 - 750 MHz
CPU in HD Graphics (Haswell) GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo Intel Pentium 3560M 2 x 2400 MHz, 37 W 400 MHz 1100 MHz Intel Pentium 3550M 2 x 2300 MHz, 37 W 400 MHz 1100 MHz Intel Celeron 2970M 2 x 2200 MHz, 37 W 400 MHz 1100 MHz » show 10 more Intel Celeron 2950M 2 x 2000 MHz, 37 W 400 MHz 1100 MHz Intel Pentium 3558U 2 x 1700 MHz, 15 W 200 MHz 1000 MHz Intel Pentium 3556U 2 x 1700 MHz, 15 W 200 MHz 1000 MHz Intel Celeron 2981U 2 x 1600 MHz, 15 W 200 MHz 1000 MHz Intel Celeron 2980U 2 x 1600 MHz, 15 W 200 MHz 1000 MHz Intel Celeron 2957U 2 x 1400 MHz, 15 W 200 MHz 1000 MHz Intel Celeron 2955U 2 x 1400 MHz, 15 W 200 MHz 1000 MHz Intel Pentium 3561Y 2 x 1200 MHz, 11.5 W 200 MHz 850 MHz Intel Pentium 3560Y 2 x 1200 MHz, 11.5 W 200 MHz 850 MHz Intel Celeron 2961Y 2 x 1100 MHz, 11.5 W 200 MHz 850 MHz min. - max. 200 - 400 MHz 650 - 1100 MHz
CPU in UHD Graphics 605 GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo Intel Pentium Silver J5040 4 x 2000 MHz, 10 W 250 MHz 800 MHz Intel Pentium Silver N5030 4 x 1100 MHz, 6 W 200 MHz 750 MHz Intel Pentium Silver N5000 4 x 1100 MHz, 6 W 200 MHz 750 MHz min. - max. 200 - 400 MHz 650 - 1100 MHz
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 500
0.2 pt (0%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics (Haswell)
0.2 pt (0%)
...
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - UHD Graphics 605
0.2 pt (1%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
113 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 19294 avg: 24491 median: 24609 (2%) max: 29579 Points
43493 Points (4%)
min: 32770 avg: 43574 median: 45008 (5%) max: 55453 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 12299 avg: 15195 median: 15085 (2%) max: 18200 Points
min: 13350 avg: 16118 median: 16553.5 (2%) max: 18016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1932 avg: 2140 median: 2116 (2%) max: 2306 Points
min: 2141 avg: 2403 median: 2335.5 (2%) max: 3011 Points
min: 2670 avg: 3247 median: 3154 (3%) max: 4294 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2578 avg: 3030 median: 3007 (1%) max: 3693 Points
min: 3111 avg: 3415 median: 3278 (1%) max: 4199 Points
min: 2874 avg: 3518 median: 3359.5 (1%) max: 4485 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 271 avg: 321.5 median: 307 (1%) max: 401 Points
min: 300 avg: 323.8 median: 314 (1%) max: 383 Points
min: 376 avg: 450.1 median: 419 (1%) max: 620 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 293 avg: 355.9 median: 362.5 (0%) max: 444 Points
min: 340 avg: 370.8 median: 362.5 (0%) max: 433 Points
min: 411 avg: 473.4 median: 454 (1%) max: 576 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 20140 avg: 26074 median: 23761 (3%) max: 34320 Points
min: 29291 avg: 34138 median: 34675 (4%) max: 40515 Points
min: 20859 avg: 25930 median: 26031 (3%) max: 30797 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
2870 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
2805 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1628 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1450 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
2013 Points (18%)
2642 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
2516 Points (15%)
2628 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
2208 Points (11%)
1789 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
2731 Points (9%)
1636 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
882 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
281 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
min: 1614 avg: 1751 median: 1619 (2%) max: 2019 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
min: 1849 avg: 2059 median: 1893 (1%) max: 2434 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 414 avg: 533 median: 530 (1%) max: 655 Points
min: 435 avg: 543 median: 544 (1%) max: 688 Points
min: 655 avg: 795 median: 748 (1%) max: 1009 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 368 avg: 478.6 median: 482 (0%) max: 584 Points
min: 384 avg: 479.6 median: 484 (0%) max: 602 Points
min: 588 avg: 701 median: 648 (1%) max: 902 Points
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 2146 avg: 2163 median: 2163 (1%) max: 2180 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel UHD Graphics 605
2162 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 1848 avg: 1859 median: 1859 (1%) max: 1870 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel UHD Graphics 605
1785 Points (1%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
8388 Points (4%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
5802 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 3393 avg: 3551 median: 3506 (5%) max: 3753 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
min: 2917 avg: 3274 median: 3357.5 (4%) max: 3463 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 2882 avg: 4208 median: 4171 (5%) max: 5570 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
1.7 fps (1%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
6.5 fps (2%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
7.2 fps (3%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
9 fps (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.3 Points (80%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
4.7 Points (59%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 500 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2791 avg: 2888 median: 2894 (2%) max: 3031 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
min: 3867 avg: 4235 median: 4215.5 (3%) max: 4642 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 3505 avg: 3812 median: 3773 (3%) max: 4366 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.05 avg: 8.2 median: 8.1 (3%) max: 9.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
min: 9.38 avg: 11.4 median: 11.6 (4%) max: 12.78 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 15.24 avg: 17.9 median: 17.9 (6%) max: 20.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 10.15 avg: 12.9 median: 13 (1%) max: 15.74 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
min: 10.28 avg: 13.2 median: 13.9 (1%) max: 14.59 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
min: 13.37 avg: 18.2 median: 18.1 (1%) max: 25.6 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.7 avg: 97.8 median: 97.8 (98%) max: 98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
98 % (98%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel UHD Graphics 605
97.8 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3.6 fps (1%)
min: 5.9 avg: 6.4 median: 6.4 (1%) max: 6.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
9.7 fps (1%)
min: 9.9 avg: 12.8 median: 12.8 (1%) max: 15.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
8.4 fps (1%)
11.6 fps (1%)
min: 7.1 avg: 11 median: 11.3 (1%) max: 14.6 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
15 fps (0%)
20.1 fps (0%)
min: 13 avg: 17.6 median: 16.5 (0%) max: 23.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
20 fps (1%)
28.7 fps (2%)
min: 16 avg: 23.8 median: 22.1 (1%) max: 33.4 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 500 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
42 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) 53.5 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel UHD Graphics 605 min: 32 avg: 43.1 median: 45.5 (0%) max: 51.9 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
16.3 fps (0%)
23.3 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
2 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
49 Samples/s (0%)
min: 77 avg: 93 median: 93 (0%) max: 109 Samples/s
min: 67 avg: 93.5 median: 93.5 (0%) max: 120 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
79 Samples/s (0%)
min: 115 avg: 140 median: 140 (0%) max: 165 Samples/s
min: 96 avg: 142 median: 142 (0%) max: 188 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 296 avg: 320 median: 324 (0%) max: 336 Points
min: 355 avg: 370 median: 370 (0%) max: 385 Points
min: 432 avg: 490.5 median: 490.5 (1%) max: 549 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.9 Watt (1%)
43.7 Watt (6%)
min: 10.3 avg: 11 median: 11 (2%) max: 11.6 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
30.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
11.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.1 fps per Watt (9%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
450 MHz (18%)
515 MHz (20%)
Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 500 → 100% n=20 Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) → 128% n=20 Average Benchmarks Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 139% n=20
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
23.9 fps
130%
UHD Graphics 605:
31.1 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
26 fps, max:
58 fps
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
24 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.2 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
7 8.2 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
6 fps, max:
11 fps
~ 8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
28.2 fps
177%
UHD Graphics 605:
49.8 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
41 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
20.2 fps
193%
UHD Graphics 605:
39 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
24 fps, max:
50 fps
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.9 fps
191%
UHD Graphics 605:
26.6 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
18 fps, max:
34 fps
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.6 fps
198%
UHD Graphics 605:
24.9 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
17 fps, max:
32 fps
fps
UHD Graphics 605:
23.6 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
11 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
UHD Graphics 605:
15 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
8 fps, max:
22 fps
fps
UHD Graphics 605:
11.7 (!) [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
Problem during benchmarking occured: too slowmin:
9 fps, max:
15 fps
17.6 ~ 15 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
0 (!) [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Problem during benchmarking occured: Spiel startete nicht fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
4.9 (!) [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Problem during benchmarking occured: Leichte grafische Probleme min:
1 fps, max:
7 fps
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
2 fps
200%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3 fps
133%
UHD Graphics 605:
4 fps
HD Graphics 500:
0 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: Spiel startete nicht fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.5 fps
160%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
1 fps
300%
UHD Graphics 605:
3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
34.4 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: error at the endmax:
93 fps
fps
154%
UHD Graphics 605:
53 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.6 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: error at the endmax:
9 fps
fps
193%
UHD Graphics 605:
8.9 fps
238%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
14.3 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
fps
117%
UHD Graphics 605:
5 6.4 7.2 8.6 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
9.1 ~ 7 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3.9 4.7 ~ 4 fps
200%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
8 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
fps
125%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.5 5.9 6 6.1 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
~ 5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3.6 4.3 ~ 4 fps
125%
UHD Graphics 605:
3.1 5.3 5.5 5.5 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
~ 5 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
3.4 4.2 4.4 5.2 7.5 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN 1.3
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
~ 5 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
3.3 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN 1.3
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
70%
UHD Graphics 605:
7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
5.9 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
5 fps, max:
7 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
13 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
7 fps, max:
13 fps
fps
310%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
62 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
54 fps
fps
200%
UHD Graphics 605:
38 41.4 ~ 40 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
17.2 fps
166%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
28.6 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
19 fps
fps
209%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.5 36.5 ~ 36 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
17 18.4 ~ 18 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
164%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
16.4 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
14 fps, max:
19 fps
fps
188%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
18.1 fps
249%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
45.1 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
37 fps, max:
54 fps
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
6.2 fps
256%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
15.9 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
13 fps, max:
19 fps
fps
161%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.9 10 ~ 10 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.9 fps
112%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.5 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
0 (!) [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Problem during benchmarking occured: Spiel startete nicht fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
8.7 fps
103%
UHD Graphics 605:
9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
17.8 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
15 fps, max:
21 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
38.6 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
35 fps, max:
52 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
21.6 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
19 fps, max:
28 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
6.3 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
5 fps, max:
8 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
14.1 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
12 fps, max:
15 fps
fps
UHD Graphics 605:
12.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
12.4 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
11 fps, max:
14 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
7.1 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
6 fps, max:
8 fps
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.9 fps
164%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
26.1 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
19 fps, max:
33 fps
fps
72%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
16.3 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
12 fps, max:
21 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
0 (!) [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Problem during benchmarking occured: Spiel startete nicht fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
6 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
3 fps, max:
9 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
8.5 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
6 fps, max:
11 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
9 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
8 fps, max:
11 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
9.4 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
8 fps, max:
11 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
5.3 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
2.5 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
1.8 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.5 fps
88%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
13.7 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
5 fps, max:
75 fps
fps
79%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
8.9 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
4 fps, max:
65 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.7 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
10 fps, max:
14 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
0 (!) [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Problem during benchmarking occured: Spiel startete nicht Black screen: dual core fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1 fps
217%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
41.4 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
21 fps, max:
51 fps
fps
126%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7 24.7 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
11 fps, max:
35 fps
~ 24 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
24.1 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
11 fps, max:
35 fps
fps
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.4 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
5 fps, max:
18 fps
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16.4 fps
132%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.7 fps
163%
UHD Graphics 605:
15.8 fps
168%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.5 33.7 35 35.9 36.5 49.5 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
42.8 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 37 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
11.5 14 14.3 14.3 15.1 18.6 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
13.1 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 15 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6 fps
143%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.9 6.7 7.4 7.8 10.6 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
8.7 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.1 fps
157%
UHD Graphics 605:
5.9 6.7 10 [X] Intel NUC7PJYHN Intel Pentium Silver J5040 2GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
8.2 fps, max:
-1 fps
~ 8 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
8.9 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
5 fps, max:
12 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
5.2 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
min:
3 fps, max:
8 fps
5.8 ~ 6 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
3.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
28.5 fps
184%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
52.4 fps
147%
UHD Graphics 605:
42 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.5 fps
102%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
12.8 fps
100%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5 11.6 11.7 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
0.501 fps, P1:
5.85 fps, max:
33.2 fps
~ 11 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
9.3 [X] Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000 1.1GHz
UHD Graphics 605
min:
0.3784 fps, P1:
4.59 fps, max:
34.4 fps
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
15.9 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
10.9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.2 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
7.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
5.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
9.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
8.4 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
10.9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
7 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
22 fps
141%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
31 fps
141%
UHD Graphics 605:
31 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16 fps
125%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
20 fps
125%
UHD Graphics 605:
20 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
5.8 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
21.6 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
17.5 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
12.9 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
13.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
17.7 fps
76%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
13.5 fps
81%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.4 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
8.3 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
16.4 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
71.6 fps
173%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
123.6 fps
135%
UHD Graphics 605:
96.9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.7 fps
191%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
26.2 fps
159%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.8 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
10.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
133%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
13.3 fps
143%
UHD Graphics 605:
14.3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
6.3 fps
154%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
9.7 fps
151%
UHD Graphics 605:
9.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
43.8 fps
133%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
58.2 fps
134%
UHD Graphics 605:
58.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1 fps
103%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
19.6 fps
86%
UHD Graphics 605:
16.5 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
2.2 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
19.9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
14 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
35.2 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
13.6 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
23.1 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
13.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
10.1 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
5.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
22.1 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
13 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.1 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
12.8 27.8 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
~ 20 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
10 18.2 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
~ 14 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.8 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
3.9 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
21 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
12 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
27 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
18 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
14 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
57.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
37 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
22.4 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
16.9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
14 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
7.8 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
15.9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
8.9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
14.2 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.5 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
36.9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
24.2 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
7.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
29.3 fps
130%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
38 38.5 ~ 38 fps
118%
UHD Graphics 605:
34.7 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.4 fps
132%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
18.6 19.6 ~ 19 fps
119%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
13.2 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.2 fps
140%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
23 32.8 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
~ 28 fps
120%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
10.3 14.2 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
~ 12 fps
132%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.9 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
2.7 fps
137%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
3.7 [X] MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD Intel Celeron 2970M 2.2GHz
HD Graphics (Haswell)
fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
96.5 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
28.3 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
15 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
59.6 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
21.5 fps
147%
UHD Graphics 605:
31.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.3 fps
199%
UHD Graphics 605:
18.5 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
12.2 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
7.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.3 fps
201%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
38.7 fps
167%
UHD Graphics 605:
32.3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.1 fps
195%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
17.7 fps
188%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.1 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
13.1 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
14.1 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
18.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.4 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
12.3 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
9.9 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
25.6 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
17.6 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
22.3 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
16.8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14 16.6 ~ 15 fps
308%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
46.2 fps
307%
UHD Graphics 605:
44.4 48.4 ~ 46 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14 fps
248%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
34.7 fps
193%
UHD Graphics 605:
26.4 27.5 ~ 27 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
22.5 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
31 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
18.8 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.7 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.7 22 ~ 17 fps
217%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
36.9 fps
169%
UHD Graphics 605:
28.8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.6 fps
169%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
23 fps
155%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.1 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
19.5 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
18.6 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
12.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
27.8 fps
129%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
36 fps
126%
UHD Graphics 605:
35 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.2 fps
131%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
16 fps
148%
UHD Graphics 605:
18 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
9.8 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
11.4 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.2 fps
196%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
21.7 22.2 ~ 22 fps
178%
UHD Graphics 605:
19.9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
7.6 fps
145%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
11.2 11.3 ~ 11 fps
162%
UHD Graphics 605:
12.3 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
6.8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
22.9 fps
161%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
36.8 fps
120%
UHD Graphics 605:
27.4 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.1 fps
150%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
16.7 fps
191%
UHD Graphics 605:
21.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
40.1 fps
129%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
51.9 fps
139%
UHD Graphics 605:
55.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.7 fps
186%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
27.4 fps
154%
UHD Graphics 605:
22.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
14.8 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
15.2 fps
UHD Graphics 605:
12.5 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
49.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
54.5 fps
144%
UHD Graphics 605:
78.7 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.1 fps
123%
UHD Graphics 605:
17.4 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
28 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
21.2 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
42.6 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
17.8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
119 fps
95%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
113 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
27.2 fps
166%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
45.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
46 fps
204%
HD Graphics (Haswell):
93.7 fps
HD Graphics (Haswell):
39.2 fps
Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 500 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) → 167% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 195%
Average Gaming Intel UHD Graphics 605 → 150% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 166%
v1.28
log 01. 11:29:40
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7543 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 4622 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 8270 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730456980s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Nov 2024 05:17:25 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.007s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7543 +0.025s ... 0.031s
#10 got single benchmarks 7543 +0.028s ... 0.059s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 4622 +0.003s ... 0.062s
#12 got single benchmarks 4622 +0.013s ... 0.075s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 8270 +0.001s ... 0.076s
#14 got single benchmarks 8270 +0.002s ... 0.078s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.127s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.128s
#18 Got 466 rows for game benchmarks. +0.035s ... 0.163s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.163s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.168s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.035s ... 0.203s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.203s
#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.204s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)