NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q (für Laptops, GN20-E5) bezeichnet eine GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU mit Max-Q Technologien. Früher waren die Max-Q-Varianten die Stromsparversionen, mit der RTX 3000 Serie kann jedoch jede TGP-Variante mit Max-Q Technologien ausgestattet werden.
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia T550 Mobile (oder auch Quadro T550 Mobile) für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und mobile Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf den selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce MX550 und bietet ebenso 1024 Shader und einen 64 Bit Speicherbus. Der Boost-Takt ist jedoch anscheinend etwas höher. Die T550 bietet 4 GB GDDR6 und in Verbindung mit dem 64 Bit Speicherbus ergibt dies eine maximale Bandbreite von 112 GB/s.
Bietet keine eigenen Displayoutputs und muss daher gemeinsam mit einer iGPU betrieben werden und nutzt deren Ausgabe über Optimus.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000 ) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für große und schwere Notebooks. Sie positioniert sich mit ihren 2560 Shadern zwischen der Consumer RTX 2070 (2304) und RTX 2080 (2944) und dürfte daher den TU104 Chip nutzen.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Features
Der TU104-Chip wird in 12nm gefertigt und bietet eine Reihe neuer Features, wie DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) und Real Time Ray Tracing. Dadurch lassen sich vor allem Beleuchtungseffekte sehr viel realistischer darstellen. Weiterhin gibt es Support für DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) sowie H.265 Video De- und Encoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
Die Performance sollte sich zwischen der RTX 5000 / GTX 2080 und RTX 3000 / GTX 2070 einpendeln. Bei professionellen Anwendungen können die Quadro-Treiber zu einer höheren Performance führen und Nvidia bewirbt die Quadro-Linie auch mit den höheren VRAM Ausstattungen, die sich bei manchen Workflows deutlich auswirken können.
Mit einem TDP von 110 Watt eignet sich die Quadro RTX 4000 nur für große und schwere Notebooks.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) Quadro Turing Serie Codename GN20-E5 GA104 TU117 N19E-Q3 Architektur Ampere Turing Turing Pipelines 5120 - unified 1024 - unified 2560 - unified Kerntakt 1290 (Boost) MHz 1065 - 1665 (Boost) MHz 1110 - 1560 (Boost) MHz Speicherbandbreite 256 Bit 64 Bit 256 Bit Speichertyp GDDR6 GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR6 Max. Speichergröße 8 GB 4 GB 8 GB Shared Memory nein nein nein API DirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Stromverbrauch 80 Watt 25 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP) 110 Watt Herstellungsprozess 8 nm 12 nm 12 nm Notebookgröße groß (17" z.B.) mittel (15.4" z.B.) groß (17" z.B.) Erscheinungsdatum 04.01.2021 27.05.2022 27.05.2019 Theoretical Performance 7.2 TFLOPS FP16, 3.7 TFLOPS FP32 Speichertakt 12000 effective = 1500 MHz 14000 MHz Memory Bandwidth 112 GB/s Informationen Optimus only Herstellerseite nvdam.widen.net Transistors 10.8 Billion Features DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2031 avg: 2187 median: 2066 (6%) max: 2465 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
min: 6823 avg: 7362 median: 7362 (21%) max: 7901 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 86% 26% 31% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1882 avg: 2021 median: 1928 (5%) max: 2252 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 85% 100%
min: 6851 avg: 7284 median: 7284 (19%) max: 7717 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 89% 25% 29% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
445161 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 17399 avg: 17614 median: 17614 (17%) max: 17829 Points
38830 Points (37%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 45%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 32743 avg: 33219 median: 33218.5 (8%) max: 33694 Points
119052 Points (29%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 28%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4559 avg: 4786 median: 4581 (8%) max: 5218 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 88% 100%
min: 15912 avg: 16903 median: 16903 (28%) max: 17894 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 89% 26% 29% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4816 avg: 5100 median: 4890 (6%) max: 5593 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 87% 100%
min: 17619 avg: 18849 median: 18849 (21%) max: 20079 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 88% 24% 28% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3530 avg: 3590 median: 3589.5 (4%) max: 3649 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7405 avg: 8160 median: 8160 (11%) max: 8915 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
min: 19880 avg: 21595 median: 21595 (28%) max: 23310 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 85% 32% 38% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7432 avg: 8067 median: 8066.5 (7%) max: 8701 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 85% 100%
min: 23739 avg: 25371 median: 25370.5 (22%) max: 27002 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 88% 28% 32% 100%
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
25155 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
56250 Points (16%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 45%
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24697 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
62557 Points (34%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 39%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
31003 Points (41%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
89.9 fps (27%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 278 avg: 282 median: 283 (42%) max: 285 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 102%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 256 avg: 263.3 median: 265 (99%) max: 269 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 650%
SPECviewperf 12 specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
149.1 fps (37%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
186 fps (27%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
98 fps (21%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
62.4 fps (16%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
144.1 fps (39%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
13.9 fps (12%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
140.7 fps (56%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
161.9 fps (27%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 95 avg: 98.8 median: 95.8 (26%) max: 105.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 125.4 avg: 152.2 median: 152.2 (41%) max: 178.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 70% 53% 59% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 95.8 avg: 101.7 median: 99.7 (11%) max: 109.67 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 271.1 avg: 314.1 median: 314.1 (35%) max: 357.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 76% 27% 31% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 24.8 avg: 26.1 median: 25.3 (6%) max: 28.06 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 94 avg: 97.2 median: 97.2 (21%) max: 100.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 94% 25% 28% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 34.5 avg: 37.2 median: 36.2 (8%) max: 40.74 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 87% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 73.2 avg: 87.9 median: 87.9 (18%) max: 102.5 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 71% 34% 40% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 77.5 avg: 82 median: 80.9 (9%) max: 87.57 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 207.9 avg: 247 median: 247 (28%) max: 286.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 73% 28% 31% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 11.7 avg: 12.4 median: 12 (4%) max: 13.37 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 89% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 36.03 avg: 40.5 median: 40.5 (13%) max: 45.02 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 80% 26% 30% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 82.4 avg: 86.2 median: 85.5 (13%) max: 90.66 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 93% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 208 avg: 239 median: 239 (35%) max: 269.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 77% 31% 34% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 104 avg: 110.4 median: 109 (12%) max: 118.22 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 212.6 avg: 245 median: 245 (27%) max: 277.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 77% 38% 43% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 61.6 avg: 63.7 median: 63 (11%) max: 66.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 94% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 173 avg: 178.7 median: 178.7 (31%) max: 184.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 94% 34% 36% 100%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 46.3 avg: 54 median: 54.3 (11%) max: 61.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 82% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 84 avg: 99.4 median: 99.3 (16%) max: 114.82 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 13.5 avg: 15.6 median: 15.4 (10%) max: 17.87 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 81% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 86.9 avg: 98.2 median: 98.1 (11%) max: 109.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 84% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 10.6 avg: 12.1 median: 12 (8%) max: 13.56 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 83% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 44.5 avg: 46.2 median: 45.7 (23%) max: 48.5 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 98%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 22.4 avg: 25.6 median: 24.9 (15%) max: 29.58 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 80% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 28.3 avg: 30 median: 29.6 (9%) max: 32.03 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 90% 100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6824 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
127.6 fps (42%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 184.9 avg: 193 median: 189.2 (11%) max: 205 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 91% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 197 avg: 215.5 median: 215.5 (13%) max: 234 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 84% 80% 88% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 99.6 avg: 99.8 median: 99.8 (100%) max: 100 %
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
19 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
43.5 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
118.3 fps (13%)
305.3 fps (34%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 39%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
172.6 fps (4%)
440.5 fps (9%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 39%
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
229.9 fps (13%)
490.4 fps (29%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
449.9 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
1213 fps (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 37%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
2840 Samples/s (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
5927 Samples/s (10%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5190 Points (6%)
13576 Points (15%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W 100% 38%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.2 avg: 34.7 median: 34.7 (5%) max: 35.1 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.2 avg: 41.3 median: 41.3 (6%) max: 41.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 42.9 avg: 44.1 median: 44.1 (10%) max: 45.3 Watt
min: 137 avg: 159.5 median: 159.5 (35%) max: 182 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 110 W 116% 151% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4393 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (40%) max: 0.4569 fps per Watt
min: 0.4341 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (43%) max: 0.511 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 110 W 100% 88% 85%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4734 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (40%) max: 0.483 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 38.2 avg: 40.4 median: 40.5 (65%) max: 42.5 dB(A)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 93% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 39.6 avg: 40.8 median: 40.8 (65%) max: 41.9 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 110 W 99% 93% 100% 93%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 0% n=0 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) → 0% n=0
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
283 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
207 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
171 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
121 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
89 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
50 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
98 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
77.5 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
42.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
37.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
22.4 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
180 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
122 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
96 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
70 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
47 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
25 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
267 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
180.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
151 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
85.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
63.3 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
118 124 ~ 121 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
102 104 ~ 103 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
99 103 ~ 101 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
88 94 ~ 91 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
72 82 ~ 77 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
39 46 ~ 43 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
150 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
125 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
93 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
86 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
60 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
33 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
143.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
119.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
105.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
69.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
34.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
116.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
100.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
86.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
81 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
65.5 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
41.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
95.4 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
93.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
85.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
81.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
72.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
39.4 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
99 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
87 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
75 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
54 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
41 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
28 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
138.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
105.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
81.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
85 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
57.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
29.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
241 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
180 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
142 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
95 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
76 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
48 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
129 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
106 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
100 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
96 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
69 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
36 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
119 122 ~ 121 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
107 110 ~ 109 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
88 90.2 ~ 89 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
76.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
139.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
98 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
90.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
52.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
35 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
289 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
148 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
141 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
109 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
45.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
199.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
127.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
104.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
45.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
146 152 ~ 149 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
135 140 ~ 138 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
130 133 ~ 132 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
124 129 ~ 127 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
100 111 ~ 106 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
303 345 ~ 324 fps
T550 Laptop GPU:
73 75 78 ~ 75 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
215 254 ~ 235 fps
T550 Laptop GPU:
39 40 43 ~ 41 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
132 153 ~ 143 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
70 79 ~ 75 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
46 56 ~ 51 fps
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 69 62 43 31 F1 2021 153 74 59 37 Strange Brigade 131 52 42 36 Far Cry 5 75 41 38 35 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 57 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 62 31 22 Dota 2 Reborn 117 105 95 88 The Witcher 3 128 75 41 21 GTA V 116 114 62 29 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 6 3 3 6 1 6 2 2 4 1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 2020 283 207 171 121 89 50 Anno 1800 98 77.5 42.6 37.7 22.4 The Division 2 180 122 96 70 47 25 Dirt Rally 2.0 267 180.7 151 85.6 63.3 Far Cry New Dawn 121 103 101 91 77 43 Just Cause 4 150 125 93 86 60 33 Darksiders III 143.8 119.2 105.2 69.1 34.2 Battlefield V 116.7 100.6 86.6 81 65.5 41.8 Hitman 2 95.4 93.6 85.8 81.1 72.9 39.4 Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 99 87 75 54 41 28 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 138.6 105.2 81.6 85 57.1 29.7 F1 2018 241 180 142 95 76 48 Far Cry 5 129 106 100 96 69 36 X-Plane 11.11 121 109 89 76.6 Ghost Recon Wildlands 139.9 98 90.8 52.9 35 For Honor 289 148 141 109 45.7 Rise of the Tomb Raider 199.6 127.8 104.9 45.1 Dota 2 Reborn 149 138 132 127 106 The Witcher 3 324 235 143 75 51 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 13 9 10 12 7 3 13 2 4 9 4 12 2
v1.28
log 10. 05:11:36
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10588 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11429 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 9856 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731211896s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10588 +0.029s ... 0.033s
#10 got single benchmarks 10588 +0s ... 0.034s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11429 +0s ... 0.034s
#12 got single benchmarks 11429 +0.007s ... 0.041s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9856 +0s ... 0.041s
#14 got single benchmarks 9856 +0.005s ... 0.046s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.083s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.083s
#18 Got 216 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.093s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.093s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.094s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.102s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.102s
#23 return log +0s ... 0.102s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)