Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA T1000

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Die Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q (für Laptops, GN20-E5) bezeichnet eine GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU mit Max-Q Technologien. Früher waren die Max-Q-Varianten die Stromsparversionen, mit der RTX 3000 Serie kann jedoch jede TGP-Variante mit Max-Q Technologien ausgestattet werden.

NVIDIA T1000

► remove from comparison

Die Nvidia T1000 Desktop ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für kleine Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf dem selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce GTX1650. Auch die Anzahl der Shadereinheiten ist mit 896 identisch. Mit 8-GB-VRAM bietet die Nvidia T1000 mehr VRAM, welcher weiterhin über ein 128 Bit Speicherbus angebunden ist. Die Leistungsaufnahme der Nvidia T1000 beträgt nur 50 Watt und kommt daher ohne einen zusätzlichen Stromanschluss aus.

Die professionellen Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-QNVIDIA T1000
Quadro Turing Serie
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti compare 10752 @ 1.56 - 1.86 GHz384 Bit @ 21000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 compare 10496 @ 1.4 - 1.7 GHz384 Bit @ 19500 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti compare 10240 @ 1.37 - 1.67 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB compare 8960/ cores @ 1.26 - 1.71 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 compare 8704 @ 1.45 - 1.71 GHz320 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti compare 6144 @ 1.58 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU compare 7424 @ 0.98 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 compare 5888 @ 1.5 - 1.73 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU compare 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti compare 4864 @ 1.41 - 1.67 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU compare 5888 @ 0.92 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU compare 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.29 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 compare 3584 @ 1.32 - 1.78 GHz192 Bit @ 15000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q compare 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 6000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q 5120 @ 1.29 GHz256 Bit
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU compare 3840 @ 0.82 - 1.7 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q compare 3840 @ 1.28 GHz192 Bit
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 compare 2560 @ 1.55 - 1.78 GHz128 Bit Bit @ 1750 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 1.22 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 1.24 - 1.49 GHz96 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU compare 1792 64 Bit
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU compare 2048 @ 1.24 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameGN20-E5 GA104
ArchitekturAmpereTuring
Pipelines5120 - unified896 - unified
Kerntakt1290 (Boost) MHz1065 - 1395 (Boost) MHz
Speicherbandbreite256 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR6GDDR6
Max. Speichergröße8 GB8 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Stromverbrauch80 Watt50 Watt
Herstellungsprozess8 nm12 nm
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum04.01.2021 06.05.2021
TMUs56
ROPs32
Theoretical Performance5000 TFLOPS FP16, 2500 TFLOPS FP32, 0.7812 TFLOPS FP64
Speichertakt10000 effective = 1250 MHz
Memory Bandwidth160 GB/s
Transistors4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
PCIe3.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 1.4a

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T1000
3.8 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1 T1000 +
3534 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
3088 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
398761 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
179865 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 T1000 +
37881 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
50553 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1 T1000 +
8124 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
8450 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
237130 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
100%
1 T1000 +
34584 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
100%
1 T1000 +
41157 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
100%
1 T1000 +
12953 Points (18%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
11793 Points (10%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 T1000 +
46318 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 T1000 +
39668 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T1000 +
78565 Points (86%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark 06
100%
1 T1000 +
58968 Points (77%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
100%
1 T1000 +
42.2 fps (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (59%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
39.3 fps (26%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
18.1 fps (12%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
78.1 fps (38%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
37.3 fps (23%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
44 fps (14%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
13.4 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
62.8 fps (10%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
9.5 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
43.3 fps (21%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
21.9 fps (14%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
27.4 fps (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 T1000 +
6837 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
252.5 fps (83%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
335.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
100%
1 T1000 +
386 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
100%
1 T1000 +
31.9 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
100%
1 T1000 +
38611 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
100%
1 T1000 +
36031 Points (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
1987 Samples/s (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
4129 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 T1000 +
6369 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
101.9 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
156.8 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
100%
1 T1000 +
0.1 fps per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T1000 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
T1000:
98.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
82.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
22  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
19  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
10  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
138.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
90.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
50.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
39.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
44  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
38  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
34.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
28.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
23.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
35.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
30.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
29.5  fps
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
T1000:
108.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
96.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
63.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
69.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
55.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
35.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
27.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
125.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
91.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
49.7  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
51.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
42.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
21.4  fps
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
T1000:
110.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
56.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
47.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
40.3  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
151  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
38.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
28.6  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
195.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
37.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
24.1  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
117  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
102.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
26.1  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
226  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
87.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
59.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
127  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
211  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
145.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
130.1  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
101.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
49.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
36.2  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
246.2  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
217.7  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
150.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
136.5  fps
low 1024x768
T1000:
188.8  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
113.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
63.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
35.2  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T1000:
187.4  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
187.1  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
103.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
50.2  fps
NVIDIA T1000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2498.482.658.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22191510
Total War Pharaoh138.690.850.639.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage444038
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty45.134.228.323.8
Baldur's Gate 34535.230.229.5
F1 23108.396.563.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands69.255.635.327.6
GRID Legends125.491.369.649.7
God of War51.842.533.521.4
Far Cry 6110.456.947.440.3
Borderlands 31516038.228.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms195.96037.324.1
Far Cry New Dawn117625853
Metro Exodus102.345.93326.1
Strange Brigade22687.269.459.9
Far Cry 5127625753
X-Plane 11.11211145.8130.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark101.349.336.2
Dota 2 Reborn246.2217.7150.4136.5
The Witcher 3188.8113.863.935.2
GTA V187.4187.1103.550.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
7
10
1
8
10
3
2
13
5
2
8
8

1






Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 05. 13:31:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10588 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12782 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730809919s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Nov 2024 05:18:20 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.026s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.026s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10588 +0.01s ... 0.036s

#9 got single benchmarks 10588 +0s ... 0.036s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.004s ... 0.04s

#11 got single benchmarks 12782 +0.004s ... 0.044s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.064s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.064s

#15 Got 83 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.069s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.069s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.07s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.076s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.076s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.078s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)