Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Die Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q (für Laptops, GN20-E5) bezeichnet eine GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU mit Max-Q Technologien. Früher waren die Max-Q-Varianten die Stromsparversionen, mit der RTX 3000 Serie kann jedoch jede TGP-Variante mit Max-Q Technologien ausgestattet werden.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M1 8-Core GPU

Die Apple M1 GPU ist eine selbst designte Grafikkarte im Apple M1 SoC und laut Apple mit sieben oder acht Kernen (im Einstiegs-MacBook Air sind nur 7 aktiviert). Die 8-Kern-Variante bietet 128 Ausführungseinheiten und eine theoretische Maximalleistung von 2,6 Teraflops. Laut Apple soll die GPU schneller sein als z.b. die iGPU in Tiger Lake.

Sie unterstützt Apple's Metal 2 Schnittstelle und dürfte eine ähnliche Architektur wie die älteren PowerVR Grafikeinheiten (z.B. im Apple A10) aufweisen.

Da der SoC im 5nm Prozess bei TSMC hergestellt wird, sollte die Energieeffizienz hervorragend sein. Die GPU nutzt laut internen Tools unter Last in etwa 10 Watt (11,5 Watt Package inkl. RAM).

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-QApple M1 8-Core GPU
Apple M1 Serie
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti compare 10752 @ 1.56 - 1.86 GHz384 Bit @ 21000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 compare 10496 @ 1.4 - 1.7 GHz384 Bit @ 19500 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti compare 10240 @ 1.37 - 1.67 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB compare 8960/ cores @ 1.26 - 1.71 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 compare 8704 @ 1.45 - 1.71 GHz320 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti compare 6144 @ 1.58 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU compare 7424 @ 0.98 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 compare 5888 @ 1.5 - 1.73 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU compare 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti compare 4864 @ 1.41 - 1.67 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU compare 5888 @ 0.92 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU compare 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.29 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 compare 3584 @ 1.32 - 1.78 GHz192 Bit @ 15000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q compare 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 6000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q 5120 @ 1.29 GHz256 Bit
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU compare 3840 @ 0.82 - 1.7 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q compare 3840 @ 1.28 GHz192 Bit
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 compare 2560 @ 1.55 - 1.78 GHz128 Bit Bit @ 1750 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 1.22 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 1.24 - 1.49 GHz96 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU compare 1792 64 Bit
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU compare 2048 @ 1.24 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
M1 Max 32-Core GPU compare 32 @ 1.3 GHz512 Bit
M1 Max 24-Core GPU compare 24 @ 1.3 GHz
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU compare 16 @ 1.3 GHz
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU compare 14 @ 1.3 GHz
M1 8-Core GPU 8 @ 1.28 GHz
M1 7-Core GPU compare 7 @ 1.28 GHz
CodenameGN20-E5 GA104
ArchitekturAmpere
Pipelines5120 - unified8 - unified
Kerntakt1290 (Boost) MHz1278 MHz
Speicherbandbreite256 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR6LPDDR4X-4266
Max. Speichergröße8 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6
Stromverbrauch80 Watt10 Watt
Herstellungsprozess8 nm5 nm
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum04.01.2021 10.11.2020
Theoretical Performance2.6 TFLOPS FP32
CPU in M1 8-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M18 x 2064 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
280200 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7588     avg: 10635     median: 10635 (46%)     max: 13682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 35978     avg: 39365     median: 39364.5 (87%)     max: 42751 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8911     avg: 9606     median: 9605.5 (48%)     max: 10300 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
25707 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4144     avg: 4696     median: 4821 (6%)     max: 4997 Points
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 88.1     avg: 89.1     median: 89.4 (5%)     max: 89.8 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 60.9     avg: 74.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 81.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 149     avg: 196.9     median: 206 (15%)     max: 216.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 150     avg: 167.4     median: 165.1 (19%)     max: 197 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 216     avg: 248.2     median: 248.7 (5%)     max: 275 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 317     avg: 358.5     median: 345 (20%)     max: 408 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M1 8-Core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 557     avg: 610     median: 588 (5%)     max: 670 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 549301     avg: 598951     median: 598951 (75%)     max: 648601 Points
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 19.6     avg: 39.4     median: 39.4 (9%)     max: 59.2 Watt
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 16     avg: 16.4     median: 16.5 (6%)     max: 16.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 8-Core GPU → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
M1 8-Core GPU:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
high
M1 8-Core GPU:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
M1 8-Core GPU:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
M1 8-Core GPU:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
M1 8-Core GPU:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
low 1280x720
M1 8-Core GPU:
30.4 52.5 54 56.7 ~ 48 fps
med. 1920x1080
M1 8-Core GPU:
20.3 30.7 32.5 33 ~ 29 fps
high 1920x1080
M1 8-Core GPU:
19 20 20.5 ~ 20 fps
low 1280x720
M1 8-Core GPU:
93.4 100 100 100.1 ~ 98 fps
med. 1920x1080
M1 8-Core GPU:
32.2 33 33 42.3 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
M1 8-Core GPU:
20 20.3 20.6 25.5 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
M1 8-Core GPU:
15 15 ~ 15 fps
low 1280x720
M1 8-Core GPU:
64 66 78 ~ 69 fps
med. 1920x1080
M1 8-Core GPU:
25 27 45 ~ 32 fps
high 1920x1080
M1 8-Core GPU:
23 25 43 ~ 30 fps
ultra 1920x1080
M1 8-Core GPU:
38  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
M1 8-Core GPU:
39  fps
high
M1 8-Core GPU:
39 39.9 40 ~ 40 fps
ultra
M1 8-Core GPU:
39 44 ~ 42 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
M1 8-Core GPU:
59  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M1 8-Core GPU:
39.6  fps
Apple M1 8-Core GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Call of Duty Mobile6060
Genshin Impact60
Armajet60
Borderlands 3482920
Total War: Three Kingdoms98352215
Shadow of the Tomb Raider69323038
PUBG Mobile394042
World of Tanks Blitz59
Rise of the Tomb Raider39.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
2
1
2

2
3
2
1
3
3






Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 10. 02:38:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10588 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10552 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731202734s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.028s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10588 +0.02s ... 0.048s

#9 got single benchmarks 10588 +0s ... 0.048s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10552 +0s ... 0.048s

#11 got single benchmarks 10552 +0.007s ... 0.055s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.058s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.058s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.064s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.064s

#17 Got 53 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.069s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.069s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.069s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.073s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.073s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.075s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)