Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos W920 vs Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz vs Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

Samsung Exynos W920

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos W920

Der Samsung Exynos W920 ist ein Dual-Core ARM SoC für IoT (Internet of Things) Devices aus 2021. Er integriert zwei ARM Cortex-A55 Kerne mit 1,18 GHz und wird im modernen 5nm Prozess gefertigt. Er integriert eine ARM Mali-G68 MP2 GPU, ein LTE Cat.4 150Mbps Download / Cat.5 75 Mbps Upload Modem und Unterstützung für eMMC 16GB und LPDDR4 12 GB. Videos können mit Full HD und 30fps aufgenommen werden und in HEVC (H.265), H.264 und VP8 en- und dekodiert werden.

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

► remove from comparison TCC8803 1GHz

ARM Mali 2D/3D graphics accelerator, DDR / DDR2 / LP-DDR2 / LP-DDR2 memory interface, LVDS Transmitter, HDMI 1.4, Composite TV-Out (NTSC / PAL), USB 2.0 HS OTG, USB 2.0 host, USB 1.1 HOST, EHI (External Host Interface), UART, NAND Flash Interface

Telechips' TCC88xx application processor will redefine the mobile device of tomorrow with new' innovative user experience by PC-like web browsing, 1080p full HD video record & playback, intuitive user interfaces, location based services and next generation social networking applications. TCC88xx supports development of planned features for the Tablet PC and HMP of tomorrow with tremendous performance and programmability to support new applications yet to be imagined. TCC88xx is equipped with hardwired VPU/GPU/ISP to maximize multimedia experience at its peak level.

 

show full text
ModelSamsung Exynos W920Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHzTelechips TCC8803 1GHz
SeriesSamsung
CodenameARM Cortex-A55
Serie:
Rockchip RK3566 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos W9301.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Samsung Exynos W920 « 1.18 GHz2 / 2 cores ARM Cortex-A55
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Clock1180 MHz1200 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 11 / 1
Technology5 nm55 nm65 nm
FeaturesMali-G68MP2, qHD 960x540 Display Support, LTE Cat.4 150Mbps DL / Cat.5 75Mbps UL, GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo), LPDDR4 (12Gb), FHD 30fps videoVivante GC800, DDR1-3 memory controller, hardware video en- and decoder
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP2Vivante GC800
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
14.3 MFLOPS (1%)
13.4 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 18706.2     avg: 19377     median: 19376.6 (23%)     max: 20047 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 2730     avg: 2861     median: 2804 (31%)     max: 3048.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1990     avg: 2060     median: 2023 (2%)     max: 2166 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1249 points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W920 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Telechips TCC8803 1GHz → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 06. 00:31:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13823 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3317 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3327 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728167513s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2024 05:16:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.053s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13823 +0.001s ... 0.054s

#9 got single benchmarks 13823 +0.004s ... 0.058s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3317 +0.001s ... 0.058s

#11 got single benchmarks 3317 +0.003s ... 0.061s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3327 +0.001s ... 0.061s

#13 got single benchmarks 3327 +0.003s ... 0.064s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.067s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.067s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)