Notebookcheck Logo

DK3.5+ST vs MediaTek MTK 8113L vs unknown

DK3.5+ST

► remove from comparison

MediaTek MTK 8113L

► remove from comparison

Der MediaTek MTK 8113L ist ein sehr einfaches SoC für E-Ink-Tablets und E-Reader. Er arbeitet sehr stromsparend, unterstützt aber weder Mobilfunk noch Kamerafunktionen.

Das SoC besitzt einen  ARM-Cortex-A53-Kern mit bis zu 1 GHz Takt.

Als Arbeitsspeicher wird LPDDR4 unterstützt. WiFi 5 und Bluetooth 5.0 sind ebenfalls an Bord. 

Das SoC wird im 12-nm-Verfahren gefertigt.

unknown

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelDK3.5+STMediaTek MTK 8113Lunknown
SeriesHuawei Mediatek
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST « 2 cores
unknown cores
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113T2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113L « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A53
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown «  cores
Cores / Threads21 / 1
1 x 1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Announced
CodenameCortex-A53
Clock1000 MHz
Technology12 nm
ArchitectureARMx86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
5778 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1343 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4370 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1006 Points (39%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
3951 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
27101 ms (32%)
185%
1 unknown +
min: 836.4     avg: 10153     median: 14670 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
763 Points (1%)
363%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 13727     median: 2773.5 (2%)     max: 46687 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 unknown +
160 Points (45%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 unknown +
200 Points (37%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
714538 Points (43%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 unknown +
197906 Points (54%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 unknown +
13858 Points (58%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 unknown +
1028 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
9.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
5.5 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MTK 8113L → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 15. 00:05:21

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12765 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18027 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731625521s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 12765 +0s ... 0.002s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18027 +0s ... 0.002s

#11 got single benchmarks 18027 +0.003s ... 0.005s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#13 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.112s ... 0.118s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.127s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.128s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.128s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)