Notebookcheck Logo

DK3.5+ST vs Intel Celeron J4105 vs unknown

Intel Celeron J4105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4105

Der Intel Celeron J4105 ist ein Ende 2017 vorgestellter Quad-Core-SoC für Desktops, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Mini-PCs verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 1,5 bis 2,5 GHz (Einzelkern Burst) und gehört der Gemini-Lake-Plattform an. Die Fertigung erfolgt wie beim Vorgänger Apollo Lake in einem 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs. Neben den vier CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit sowie einen DDR4/LPDDR4-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.400 MHz). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben.

ModelDK3.5+STIntel Celeron J4105unknown
SeriesHuawei Intel Gemini Lake
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST « cores
unknown cores
Intel Celeron J4105 « 1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown «  cores
Cores / Threads24 / 4
Announced
CodenameGemini Lake
Clock1500 - 2500 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
TDP10 Watt
Technology14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
270 Points (2%)
384%
1 unknown +
min: 1029     avg: 1038     median: 1038 (7%)     max: 1047 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
73 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 unknown +
37732 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 unknown +
8923 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 unknown +
5039 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
5637 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 unknown +
1950 Points (52%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 unknown +
4741 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
423 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
2563 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6498 Points (65%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
15112 Points (17%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
min: 14670     avg: 14812     median: 14811.5 (17%)     max: 14953 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 unknown +
min: 2672     avg: 2740     median: 2753 (2%)     max: 2794 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
103 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
55.8 MB/s (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
250 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
25 MB/s (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1592 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28089 Points (45%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
13948 Points (64%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 unknown +
1081 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
6.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 unknown +
0.6 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4105 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks unknown → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 19. 00:26:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12765 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9928 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1729290386s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 05:17:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9928 +0s ... 0.007s

#11 got single benchmarks 9928 +0s ... 0.007s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0s ... 0.007s

#13 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.117s ... 0.124s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.124s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.127s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.128s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.128s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.129s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.129s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.132s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.132s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.133s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.133s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.133s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.134s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.134s

#27 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.135s

#28 return log +0s ... 0.135s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)