Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Cortex-M4 vs Intel Core i5-13500

Intel Core i5-13500

Der Intel Core i5-13500 ist ein schneller und sparsamer Desktop-Prozessor auf Basis der Raptor-Lake-Architektur, die bereits im Oktober 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Der Prozessor bietet einen Basistakt von 2,5 GHz und erreicht bis zu 4,8 GHz im Turbo. Die mit Alder-Lake eingeführte hybride CPU-Architektur kommt auch bei den Raptor-Lake-Prozessoren zum Einsatz. Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i5-12500 bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 mehr Kerne, womit eine höhere Gesamtleistung erzielt werden kann. In Summe kann der Intel Core i5-13500 bis zu 20 Threads parallel verarbeiten. Die Performance-Kerne (P-Cores) bieten hierzu Hyperthreading, was den energieeffizienten Kernen (E-Cores) vorenthalten wird.

Performance

Aufgrund der höheren Anzahl an physikalischen Recheneinheiten bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 spürbar mehr Leistung. Beide Prozessoren verfügen über 6 P-Kerne, wenngleich nur der Intel Core i5-13500 zusätzlich mit 8 E-Kernen bestückt ist.

Grafikeinheit

Wie auch der Intel Core i5-12600K bietet der Intel Core i5-13500 eine integrierte Grafikeinheit. Als Basis dient weiterhin die Intel Iris Xe-Architektur. Rein leistungstechnisch hat sich bei der neuen Intel UHD Graphics 770 aber nicht viel verändert. 

Leistungsaufnahme

Die TDP des Intel Core i5-13500 beläuft sich auf 65 Watt, mit der Option, diese im Turbo auf bis zu 154 Watt zu erhöhen. Gegenüber dem Intel Core i5-12500 steigt der Energiebedarf etwas an.

ModelARM Cortex-M4Intel Core i5-13500
CodenameRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-S
Serie: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K compare3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 « 2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T compare1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache11.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.5 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2154 Watt
Technology10 nm
Die Size215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500
38.3 pt (64%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
107 Points (60%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
822 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
14573 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1780 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
685 Points (76%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5633 Points (14%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2405 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
256 Points (72%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.4 Points (37%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8875 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
49300 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
79625 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14282 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7704 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
55528 MIPS (32%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5887 MIPS (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
134.6 fps (45%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
306 fps (71%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.3 fps (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.3 GB/s (40%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12 GB/s (31%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
399 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
223 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14875 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
69725 Points (54%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18026 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84456 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
83392 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
81778 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17891 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
26263 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9655 Points (41%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2483 Points (63%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
10348 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1805 Points (71%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
10322 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1749 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10213 Points (32%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7379 Points (74%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
39094 Points (39%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
519 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (71%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
266 Points (49%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1549 Points (59%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
98.7 Watt (17%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
121 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
7.9 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
19.9 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 17. 05:41:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17901 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734410498s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Dec 2024 05:18:38 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0s ... 0.001s

#8 got single benchmarks 13222 +0s ... 0.002s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17901 +0.004s ... 0.005s

#10 got single benchmarks 17901 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.033s

#13 return log +0.012s ... 0.046s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)